@zhangye4132882 depending on the indian you speak to
1) vehicle for victimhood politics
2) just another sect within the larger Hindu fold
3) arch nemesis of the Hindu religion
Hinduism always was a unified whole as correctly identified by Anglos. as for boodism, it did take off in India and was peer reviewed out of the subcontinent slowly and methodically over centuries by the following hindu philosophers among many
This is also why Buddhism never really took off in India. It was simply seen as yet another spiritual system out of thousands of preexisting ones, and it only flourished in China because the emperors took a liking to it.
>Linguists knowing Dravidian languages have said the origin of viṣṇu is in the verb, viḷ- which forms the nouns, viṇṇu/viṇḍu/viṭṭu. It is viṇṇu > viṣṇu.
peak Dravidian scholarship. is there even one eg of tamil ṇṇ morphing into skt ṣṇ or the other way round?
For bricks, iṭu- verb from Dravidian gives rise to iṭṭi > iṣṭi.
https://t.co/kfoqW8sFzj
There is another important example from Rgveda itself. Vedicists like Jan Gonda and others have explained that viṣṇu means solar deity, the sun's rays being talked about:
https://t.co/XoEohQOiNd
Trivikrama avatara in Puranic mythology develops in later centuries after a millennium or so. Similar to Shiva in Rgveda. He is not the Shiva of later periods. In Tamil, only Jains start using Siva first, and this happens much later than the Sangam period.
Linguists knowing Dravidian languages have said the origin of viṣṇu is in the verb, viḷ- which forms the nouns, viṇṇu/viṇḍu/viṭṭu. It is viṇṇu > viṣṇu.
@0007ferrero >> This def makes sense to me for one reason. The other Steppe-Zagroasian deried Aryans (Medes, Avestans) in SCAsia do not use bricked altars like we do. Only Vedics with deep IVC base in Haryana first started doing this. So, makes perfect sense..
Several words from India spread to Iran and BMAC in the Post-Harappan period. One such word is iṣṭi (from Dravidian iṭṭi. Cf. For the production of the retroflex ṣ as in viṇṇu > viṣṇu, so also iṭṭi > iṣṭi. In Iran and BMAC, iṣṭi loses the retroflexion.
A friend asked about Tocharian word for brick. It is borrowed from Iran whic ultimately comes from IVC all the 1200 sites might have used bricks in the order of several millions. We have the word for brick borrowed from Sanskrit in Avestan in 3rd century BCE. Tocharian A and B are from 1st millennium CE, and these languages got the word for brick from Iran.
https://t.co/DasdDY1yCz
BMAC loans in Tocharian (and other languages)
TB iśceṃ* ‘clay, brick’, also in TB iṣcake < *iścäke and A *iśäk (based on Uigh. išič, išič ‘clay, brick’) < CT *is't'äkæ corresponds to Indo-Iranian, e.g., Vedic íṣṭakā- ‘brick’, Old Pers. išti, Mod. Pers. xišt ‘brick’. Reference:
https://t.co/lAncs22PHr
N. Ganesan
https://t.co/XoEohQOiNd
> Yet apparently Víṣṇu isn't a deity.
Definitely Vishnu is a deity. what Vedicists have written is that he is not the Puranic Vishnu, as developed in first centuries CE. Vishnu is the Solar deity in the Veda.
Similar to Shiva in RV. He is not the Shiva of later periods. In Tamil, only Jains start using Siva first, much later than the Sangam period.
"So what if the first ever triple digit USDINR print blows through the psychological resistance without creating a top, opens the floodgates for a higher squeeze, wrecks carnage on external balances, imports, inflation that econoshits are supposed to be experts about?"
picunrel
in enneads i.6.9, plotinus exhorts the seeker to “withdraw into yourself and look” (εἰς σαυτὸν ἀναχώρει καὶ ἴδε), comparing spiritual self cultivation to a sculptor who removes excess stone until beauty appears.
Le vieux du quartier m’a dit : « N’oublie pas que la boussole a été inventée avant l’horloge parce que la direction est plus importante que le temps. »
@NR_Tatvamasi in Kerala temples usually theres a chain obstructing that part of the praakaram. still many people jump over it to finish the pradakshinam
@DrDavidMiano@GallianiFan@mayurekbote@thar_ol history was used as a tool to coerce conversion and dismember living traditions for a better part of that 150 years.
didn't have complete success with hinduism. hence the seethe by your kind.
@DrDavidMiano@mayurekbote@thar_ol >why give them different names?
that's a question you should ask yourself, midwit. an adhvaryu in 1000BC and a bhakti saint in 1000AD would share much of the same sacred language, scriptures and ritual framework to the point of being almost indistinguishable
Do you go up to school teachers at the grocery store and ask them to teach you? If not, then why do you do it here? You didn't pay tuition. If you want me to teach you for free, go to my YouTube channel. Don't bother me when I am off work and ask me to go do research for you. You think I have 30 minutes to spare for each request? If I know something off the top of my head, I will tell you. Everything I say here is voluntary and at my discretion.
self avowed tertiary source historian and eminent mogul court chronicler trying to explain to vaidika bamman circa 2026AD how his living tradition is definitely fake and expired 3000 yrs back
@NMRatnam achieved through different yet similar means...bhRtyaanaam anuparodhena kSetraM vittaM ca dadad braahmaNebhyo yathaa.arham anantaaMl lokaan abhijayati