Alan Couzens engages a lot in scientific-looking BS that's marketing dressed up as rigor. His chart below is a prime example: arbitrary quantities given decimals and units to produce a recommendation that's not even the consequence of the 'model.' And what's left is just the standard recommendation about training intensity distribution. Let's unpack this:
The benefit:cost column is just fitness benefit divided by recovery cost. The mechanical risk/injury column doesn't even figure in the calculation despite the headline about risk.
But what happens when you divide a per-minute variable by another per-minute variable? You cancel out duration! That's a fatal move for any training allocation model.
And where do the per-minute benefits and costs come from? Hint: change the Z2 benefit from 5 to 6 and you get a tie between Z1 and 2. So the outcome depends entirely on carefully hand-choses values.
Here's the kicker: his 'use higher zones sparingly' doesn't even follow from the math. Adding any Z2–Z5 only makes the model’s objective worse. In other words, the model provides no internal rationale for higher-intensity training at all!
So, strip away all the pseudo-quantification and you're left with the standard recommendation of mostly easy with some hard sprinkled in. The science-looking arithmetic doesn't establish that recommendation, and it can't even reproduce it.
P.S. I would have tagged Couzens but he blocked me long ago when I suggested his zone 1 looks alot like what most other schemes call zone 2 (it is). He blocks everyone who raises even the faintest scrutiny about his approach, which seems to me hardly the temperament of a 'mad scientist.'
@function2fitnes How do you know that's the precise biomechanical driver? That has never been validated. Nor has the intervention to avoid compression been validated. You might be right but we need to hold back on this certainty
@physiojack@BillingMartin For sure, but these are all things that could be other diagnoses. So, that implies we would need other criteria to diagnose knee OA an exclude something else (e.g knee cap pain)
@BenMulroneyShow@BenMulroney@fordnation Victory is such a weird way to put this. I don't understand how bike lanes are politicized. Why would you not want alternate forms of commuting that make driving better?
@BillingMartin@MensahPT Can you expand on this? Are you explaining the idea that OA is a local manifestation of a systemic issue (metabolic disorder etc) and these variables "sensitize" the normal joint changes that occur with age?
"but zone 2 work can improve v02max!"
This is true, but incomplete. You can do all the zone 2 work in the world, but if it comes at the expense of including strides, sprints, short intervals further up the aerobic intensity spectrum you will walk outside one day and realize your 5km PR pace feels like an all out sprint.
So its actually been 7 years, 6 months, 5 days…
Or 391 weeks and 6 days…
Or 2,743 days…
And still the HCPC hasn’t decided if I am fit to practice as a physio due to some petty, malicious, vindictive people making either false or ridiculous complaints about my so called unprofessionalism!
Full list of allegations here if anyones interested! https://t.co/rbKi5u7V5c