@MargraveJuro@ctboosts@rgibbbbb@fliff And that’s what everyone has been trying to tell you and others and you ignored the warnings. It’s not gambling winnings and you can’t deduct your losses/purchases
The deadly shooting in Minneapolis today was a straight-up execution of a protester by Trump's federal brownshirts.
The thugs wrestled him to the ground. They pistol-whipped him, then shot him multiple times. They murdered him.
The videos don't lie. A man is dead, killed in cold blood. There is no conceivable justification for this intentional homicide. And make no mistake, that intentional, unjustified homicide was committed on behalf of Donald J. Trump.
Trump's militarization of Minneapolis and other parts of our nation isn't about illegal immigration. It's not about enhancing public safety. It's about destroying any sense of that safety—to intimidate political opponents, and to punish dissent. It's about a corrupt, out-of-control regime's effort to provoke citizens in order to justify the violence it desires to commit against them so that it can expand and retain its power.
That is fascism. It is tyranny. It is governmental criminality.
And the ultimate legal check the Framers of our Constitution provided to stop this kind of tyranny and criminality in the executive branch is impeachment and removal of the executive.
Congress needs to do its job.
Now.
Before it's too late.
@Bradley88995765 @bpokerr @Ian361871781000 @ClubWPTGold The technical answer is you’re wrong. Sweepstakes is the gross prizes without any deductions for losses. Whether anyone will do it that way is a different story.
@DoctorG0lf I’m talking federal. A large group of that 99% does not itemize and is taxed on their winnings whether they are profitable or not, if they file correctly.
@WraniumBets@BoredSportsBets@EV_Architect You could maybe argue the other way around that a WR scoring makes it more likely a RB will score later in the game because they’ll be running more. But I still think that’s game play built into the original odds to individually score and not correlation.
@WraniumBets@BoredSportsBets@EV_Architect I would definitely rethink that position. They weren’t positively correlated. Maybe their original odds were wrong. Or maybe it was good variance.