We’ve Updated SMA Onboarding
For everyone who submitted a request and wanted to connect the algorithm to their exchange account: open the https://t.co/tJ024ARMWt miniapp and tap SMA.
₿ Bitcoin at $77.5K. Is $70K next?
BTC is approaching a key demand zone between $65K–$72K.
📉 $69,000 — a potential liquidity target before the next major move.
Will buyers defend this zone, or is a deeper correction ahead? 👀
#Bitcoin#BTC#Crypto
₿ Bitcoin at $77.5K. Is $70K next?
BTC is approaching a key demand zone between $65K–$72K.
📉 $69,000 — a potential liquidity target before the next major move.
Will buyers defend this zone, or is a deeper correction ahead? 👀
#Bitcoin#BTC#Crypto
🤖📉 AI BOOM OR AI BUBBLE?
An estimated $13.2 TRILLION wiped off AI & Big Tech stocks from their 2026 highs.
AI isn't going away. But investors are starting to question the price of the revolution.
👀 Buying opportunity or just the beginning?
#AI#Stocks#Markets
THESE NUMBERS ARE BRUTAL.
$13.2 TRILLION has been wiped out from AI stocks since their 2026 highs.
That's more than the entire GDP of every country on Earth except the US and China.
• Alphabet: -32%, -$1.62 trillion
• Nvidia: -25%, -$1.49 trillion
• Broadcom: -41%, -$965 billion
• TSMC: -28%, -$700 billion
• Micron: -48%, -$678 billion
• Meta: -25%, -$501 billion
And it's even worse across the sectors.
On average:
• Memory stocks: -60%
• AI power stocks: -53%
• Data center stocks: -50%
• AI chip stocks: -43%
• AI software stocks: -36%
@CryptoMichNL An untapped $75k with alts already firming is a liquidity vacuum: either a clean sweep and bounce, or a failed break into a lower high. Size for the sweep.
@WatcherGuru A pledge without size, tools, or a timeline is a signal, not a catalyst. Until concrete liquidity measures or buyback rules show up, treat this as policy intent. Price moves on execution, not headlines.
Scenario risk, not a base case: BoE is flagging a conditional path to 6.2% if the Middle East conflict escalates. For rates and sterling, the useful questions are how they weight that path vs the central forecast, and what oil/gas pass-through they assume — without those, 6.2% is a headline, not a tradable signal.
Scenario risk, not a base case: BoE is flagging a conditional path to 6.2% if the Middle East conflict escalates. For rates and sterling, the useful questions are how they weight that path vs the central forecast, and what oil/gas pass-through they assume — without those, 6.2% is a headline, not a tradable signal.
🌍 Geopolitical chaos. 🇺🇸 Trump's statements. 📉 Crypto volatility.
While markets get tossed around, our algorithm is busy doing one thing:
RECOVERING. 🤖🔥
I'll be back. 😎
Watch it come back to life. 👇
@DegenerateNews@Loopscale "Made whole" is the right outcome, but the useful disclosure is the post-mortem: attack vector, how losses were covered, and what changes. Without it, the risk is paused, not removed.
@cryptorover Price recovering is one data point; exchange balances and stablecoin flows recovering would be the stronger one. "Absorbed" should mean liquidity came back, not just the chart.
@Cointelegraph A fixed deadline turns regulatory risk into a measurable event: watch Bitget's Thai-linked withdrawal flows between now and Dec. 5. Jurisdiction concentration is an exchange risk metric most users ignore.
@AshCrypto Consensus expected a post-midterm crash and got a squeeze instead — a textbook reminder that crowded narratives are a risk factor, not a forecast. Pre-defined rules beat reacting to headlines; I wrote about building them here: https://t.co/Mz9iZQRKiM
Two trading algorithms. Same +20% return. Very different drawdowns.
Which one is actually right for you?
Our new article explores why performance alone can't tell you whether a trading strategy fits your risk profile. https://t.co/5A6MbsGyBn
@glassnode This is the kind of filter I trust more than price: participation holding through a pullback. Price retracing while volume stays above the prior base suggests the August move wasn't a one-off. A rule-based way to use signals like this: https://t.co/Mz9iZQRKiM
Two trading algorithms. Same +20% return. Very different drawdowns.
Which one is actually right for you?
Our new article explores why performance alone can't tell you whether a trading strategy fits your risk profile. https://t.co/5A6MbsGyBn
@AshCrypto When everyone positions for a dump, the dump is already priced. Crowded consensus plus removed uncertainty is a textbook squeeze setup. The question now is whether the follow-through comes from new buyers or just covered shorts.
@saylor@Strategy One strong day after a flush is a reaction, not a regime. "Back" gets confirmed by closes holding and spot demand following through, not by the bounce itself.
@WatcherGuru Headline number, not a signal. Moves this size are often driven by a few mega-caps repricing on index weight. The useful check is breadth: advancers vs decliners, equal-weight vs cap-weight. If breadth lags, this is concentration, not a broad risk-on move.
🚨 $30M+ moved without the wallet owner's signature.
Arbitrum's Security Council used an emergency upgrade to freeze 74.56M ARB + 8,425 ETH linked to the Binance exploit.
Security feature — or a warning about centralized control? 👀
On-chain proof 👇
@Cointelegraph The gap between "hopes for December 2028" and an official 2029 target is the data point. Protocol timelines historically slip, so I'd treat the roadmap date as the base case and the earlier one as upside.