This is correct, I think a number of people on the tl didn’t read past the title and made inferences and comparisons that are just wrong and then use it as an opportunity to take cheap shots. This is not a “feature” like some crappy Slack bot and it’s certainly not a Claw, though it has aspects of it. It is an org-level harness. The difference will become clearer over time.
I’m tired of updates on cli so often and updating them, can we not have auto update on launch by default ? what are we doing smh
@thsottiaux@ClaudeDevs
@TomanatorDev@Prathkum A combination of both actually. Quite annoying to keep track actually. Mostly having dumps saved and then a skill for retrieval and summarising. Then had iterative feedback over bug hunting.
None of this shitshow would have happened if Anthropic weren't so obsessed with making unsafe AI to prove their point about AI safety
They literally hyperstitioned a cybersecurity autistic AI with RL and now they can't even release the nerfed version due to jailbreaks
I don’t think people realise that open source will not catch up with Fable/Opus standards as a general model. Now, there is an incentive and push more than ever to stop open source labs. I don’t think the same cadence of closure of the gap will continue. I don’t think it’s economically viable.
I think the part that community fact checkers like to leave out is that the market is pricing it as a growth company. Its revenue and net cash flows don’t matter because future cash flow is discounted more. you are no different, still biased to a side by the omission of information. The debate on effective market cap is different but your argument is wrong