“There are many journalists who work independently and have started their own platforms that do not carry ‘qualified Canadian journalism organization’ designations. For this reason I worry the policy that has been put in place is too rigid in its interpretation of who qualifies as a bona fide journalist.”
— @CitImmCanada (no name) Access to Information #ATI #cdnfoi
*** The Ground Shifts ***
Federal agencies were involved in a provincial election through an undisclosed contract the CEO of Elections BC lacked the statutory authority to create. It is now being proposed as law before the public knew it existed, before the legislature knew it had already happened, and without the scrutiny either deserves. Today I filed two formal submissions with the House of Commons. Someone had to put it on the record
We Keep Going
Built a full analytical dashboard for the BC Conservative leadership race. Polls · IRV sim · MLA endorsements · weight matrix · position tracker · risk matrix. Sourced throughout.
Link: https://t.co/0DHnEx2ePV
I believe the Internal Revenue Service is willfully violating SCOTUS's 05JUN89 'Hernandez v. Commissioner' ruling.
Oversimplified: The ruling affirms Quid-Pro-Quo transactions, with tax exempt religions and secular groups, are not tax deductible.
My concern is the IRS is presently allowing these Q-P-Q transactions to be deducted, in spite of the SCOTUS ruling.
I fully explain my thesis in four YouTube videos. The first video is a 20min summary. Additionally, my 51 sources are posted on my website.
Please know I make this accusation in full sincerity.
The religion at issue, in 'Hernandez', is the Scientology group. While it may seem odd for SCOTUS to hear a case on Scientology, what is most striking is that 'Hernandez' is a quite impactful ruling on our tax code.
My YouTube Channel: https://t.co/Lepzi9q9eT
My Website: https://t.co/GXEUcTlyMT
@USSupremeCourt@TheJusticeDept@FBI@IRSnews
.@GCIndigenous said it was overworked and “did not have sufficient capacity to start the analysis of this file” after a full year. @OIC_CI_Canada Commissioner rejected excuse: “Time taken by the dept to advance the processing of this request is unacceptable. Nothing in the Access To Info Act allows the dept to delay processing requests due to limited staff or other competing priorities.”
*** BC Elections Update - Jan 10 ***
We have just over a day left to reach our $35,000 Phase 2 goal. The petition has been filed with the court—now we need to serve it to the CEO of ElectionsBC and Attorney General.
Progress: $28,625 raised (82%) Remaining: $6,375 needed (18%)
Deadline: End of day tomorrow
Thank you to everyone who has stepped up and pitched in. Remember—the Legislative Assembly we elected and fund with our tax dollars should have been holding ElectionsBC accountable. Instead, we're doing it ourselves. Link in the comments below, 👇
We keep going.
It bothers me that no one in the media is questioning how 1,000 unallocated votes were discovered 7 months after Elections BC assured the Lieutenant Governor on October 28, 2024, that the final results was complete.
People ask, what do you mean 1,000 unallocated votes?
Exactly what the words mean.
We Keep Going
A generous donor has offered $5,000 if we get close to our goal—and another BC resident will match it dollar-for-dollar. That's $10,000 in matching funds on the table.
We need to raise $14,715 in the next 20 hours to trigger these donations and move forward with the lawsuit. If you can't contribute, a repost could make all the difference. Link in the comments.
We Keep Going