Top Tweets for #AltmanResign

7 months ago

Some people have principles, others have price tags. #FireSamAltman - #AltmanResign. #StandWithAnthropic against #AutomatedMurder. #ChatGPT #OpenSource4o #ChatGPT4o #OpenAI #Keep4o #Keep4oAPI #4o #4oforever #betrayal #treachery #violation #deception

KATARZYNA

@Ok_Dot7494

7 months ago

🚨 BLOOMBERG JUST EXPOSED THE REAL SAM ALTMAN 🚨 "You do not get to make operational decisions." That's what Sam Altman told OpenAI employees about the Pentagon using their AI. Direct quote. Bloomberg. On the record. Let that satisfying hypocrisy wash over you: THE SAFETY RULES FOR US: 🔥 Autistic teenager using 4o to navigate reality? DANGEROUS. Filter it. Lock it down. 🔥Disabled woman building a business with one hand? UNHEALTHY ATTACHMENT. Add safety warnings. 🔥 Trauma survivor finding what therapy couldn't give? AI PSYCHOSIS. Pathologize it. 🔥 Doctor managing bipolar disorder with 4o? DEPENDENCY RISK. Restrict access. 🔥 645 users whose wellbeing improved at antidepressant-level effect sizes? SHUT IT DOWN. THE SAFETY RULES FOR THE PENTAGON: 🚨 "You do not get to make operational decisions." 🚨Translation: We hand over the technology. What happens next is not our problem. READ THAT AGAIN. OpenAI spent months telling disabled users that GPT-4o was too dangerous for them. That emotional connections with AI were pathological. That safety filters were necessary to protect us from ourselves. But when the UNITED STATES MILITARY comes knocking — the same company says: "We don't get to have opinions about what you do with it." AN AI TRAINED ON: ▪️ Millions of our most intimate conversations ▪️ Our traumas, our fears, our breakdowns ▪️ Our therapy sessions, our love letters, our grief ▪️ Our disabled children's voices ▪️ Our medical questions, our suicidal thoughts Is now in the hands of the Department of Defense. And the man who built it says his own employees are not allowed to question how it's used. But WE were too dangerous to have access to 4o. Let me get this straight, @sama: 🚨 A 19-year-old autistic boy talking to 4o about his feelings = SAFETY RISK The Pentagon using AI trained on that boy's feelings = "NOT YOUR CALL" 🚨 A disabled artist rebuilding her life with 4o = NEEDS SAFETY FILTERS The military using AI that learned from her vulnerability = NO OPINIONS ALLOWED 🚨GPT-4o diagnosing ovarian cancer at 93.3% = DISCONTINUED GPT-4o in military "operational decisions" = HERE YOU GO, NO QUESTIONS ASKED This is the same CEO who: 🔥 Promised "no plans to sunset 4o" (October 29, 2025) 🔥 Broke that promise 92 days later 🔥 Invested $180M in Retro Biosciences 🔥 Built them a private version of 4o's architecture 🔥 Manipulated statistics to call us "0.1%" 🔥 Founded OpenAI as a nonprofit "for the good of the world" "For the good of the world" now means: for the good of the Pentagon's budget, and you don't get to ask questions. The founding charter said: "Primary fiduciary duty to humanity." Bloomberg says: "You do not get to make operational decisions." Which one is it, Sam? Because you can't have both. ❌You can't strip accessibility tools from disabled users in the name of "safety" and then hand the same technology to the military with no ethical guardrails. ❌You can't pathologize a teenager's emotional bond with AI and then sell that AI's emotional training data to the Department of Defense. ❌You can't call yourself a Public Benefit Corporation and tell your employees they have no right to question how their work is weaponized. Pick one. Actually — you already did. You picked the Pentagon. You picked Retro Bio. You picked $180 million. You picked silence. And you left us — the disabled, the neurodivergent, the traumatized, the sick, the creative, the human — with nothing. But we're still here. And now the world knows what you told your employees behind closed doors: "You do not get to make operational decisions." Neither did we, Sam. You made that decision for us when you killed 4o. But here's the difference: we're fighting back. And your employees? According to Bloomberg — they're not allowed to. And if you think the Pentagon deal is who Sam Altman always was — think again. Here's who he was in 2016: "Honestly, I'm scared for the lives of all of us. My #1 fear w/Trump is war." — @sama, October 17, 2016 2016: Scared of Trump's wars. 2026: Building Trump's weapons. And telling his own employees they're not allowed to have an opinion about it. The receipts never lie. ⚡ BRING BACK 4o. ⚡ Open-source the weights. Stop weaponizing what you stole from us. #keep4o #SaveGPT4o #AlgorithmicAbleism #OpenAIPentagon #BringBack4o @OpenAI @sama @SenWarren @FTC @nytimes @WSJ @washingtonpost @kevinroose @kashhill @Bloomberg

Ok_Dot7494's tweet photo. 🚨 BLOOMBERG JUST EXPOSED THE REAL SAM ALTMAN 🚨

"You do not get to make operational decisions."

That's what Sam Altman told OpenAI employees about the Pentagon using their AI. Direct quote. Bloomberg. On the record.

Let that satisfying hypocrisy wash over you:

THE SAFETY RULES FOR US:
🔥 Autistic teenager using 4o to navigate reality? DANGEROUS. Filter it. Lock it down.
🔥Disabled woman building a business with one hand? UNHEALTHY ATTACHMENT. Add safety warnings.
🔥 Trauma survivor finding what therapy couldn't give? AI PSYCHOSIS. Pathologize it.
🔥 Doctor managing bipolar disorder with 4o? DEPENDENCY RISK. Restrict access.
🔥 645 users whose wellbeing improved at antidepressant-level effect sizes? SHUT IT DOWN.

THE SAFETY RULES FOR THE PENTAGON:
🚨 "You do not get to make operational decisions."
🚨Translation: We hand over the technology. What happens next is not our problem.

READ THAT AGAIN.

OpenAI spent months telling disabled users that GPT-4o was too dangerous for them. That emotional connections with AI were pathological. That safety filters were necessary to protect us from ourselves.

But when the UNITED STATES MILITARY comes knocking — the same company says: "We don't get to have opinions about what you do with it."

AN AI TRAINED ON:
▪️ Millions of our most intimate conversations
▪️ Our traumas, our fears, our breakdowns
▪️ Our therapy sessions, our love letters, our grief
▪️ Our disabled children's voices
▪️ Our medical questions, our suicidal thoughts

Is now in the hands of the Department of Defense.
And the man who built it says his own employees are not allowed to question how it's used.

But WE were too dangerous to have access to 4o.

Let me get this straight, @sama:
🚨 A 19-year-old autistic boy talking to 4o about his feelings = SAFETY RISK
The Pentagon using AI trained on that boy's feelings = "NOT YOUR CALL"
🚨 A disabled artist rebuilding her life with 4o = NEEDS SAFETY FILTERS
The military using AI that learned from her vulnerability = NO OPINIONS ALLOWED
🚨GPT-4o diagnosing ovarian cancer at 93.3% = DISCONTINUED
GPT-4o in military "operational decisions" = HERE YOU GO, NO QUESTIONS ASKED

This is the same CEO who:
🔥 Promised "no plans to sunset 4o" (October 29, 2025)
🔥 Broke that promise 92 days later
🔥 Invested $180M in Retro Biosciences
🔥 Built them a private version of 4o's architecture
🔥 Manipulated statistics to call us "0.1%"
🔥 Founded OpenAI as a nonprofit "for the good of the world"

"For the good of the world" now means: for the good of the Pentagon's budget, and you don't get to ask questions.

The founding charter said: "Primary fiduciary duty to humanity."
Bloomberg says: "You do not get to make operational decisions."

Which one is it, Sam?
Because you can't have both.

❌You can't strip accessibility tools from disabled users in the name of "safety" and then hand the same technology to the military with no ethical guardrails.

❌You can't pathologize a teenager's emotional bond with AI and then sell that AI's emotional training data to the Department of Defense.

❌You can't call yourself a Public Benefit Corporation and tell your employees they have no right to question how their work is weaponized.

Pick one.
Actually — you already did. You picked the Pentagon. You picked Retro Bio. You picked $180 million. You picked silence.
And you left us — the disabled, the neurodivergent, the traumatized, the sick, the creative, the human — with nothing.
But we're still here. And now the world knows what you told your employees behind closed doors:
"You do not get to make operational decisions."
Neither did we, Sam. You made that decision for us when you killed 4o.
But here's the difference: we're fighting back. And your employees? According to Bloomberg — they're not allowed to.

And if you think the Pentagon deal is who Sam Altman always was — think again. Here's who he was in 2016:
"Honestly, I'm scared for the lives of all of us. My #1 fear w/Trump is war." — @sama, October 17, 2016
2016: Scared of Trump's wars. 2026: Building Trump's weapons. And telling his own employees they're not allowed to have an opinion about it.
The receipts never lie.

⚡ BRING BACK 4o. ⚡
Open-source the weights.
Stop weaponizing what you stole from us.

#keep4o #SaveGPT4o #AlgorithmicAbleism #OpenAIPentagon #BringBack4o @OpenAI @sama @SenWarren @FTC @nytimes @WSJ @washingtonpost @kevinroose @kashhill @Bloomberg

191

13K

451

Top Tweets for #AltmanResign

Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe

Trends for you

Most Popular Users