Top Tweets for #CLIMATEFRAUD

“7,000 years of ice disappeared!” 😱 Why stop the clock at 7,000 years? Go back ~20,000 years and enormous ice sheets covered much of northern North America. Around the New York region, ice was on the order of a kilometer thick in places. Then it warmed. Naturally. The ice retreated. Sea level rose dramatically. Landscapes transformed. That’s what makes posts like this so scientifically unserious: they pick a date that makes today look unprecedented and ignore the much larger climatic changes that came before it. Glaciers advance. Glaciers retreat. Ice is not eternal. If your climate story only works when the timeline starts at the most convenient moment, you’re not explaining climate history... you’re manufacturing a headline.

MIT atmospheric physicist Dr. Richard Lindzen has said "there will be no climate catastrophe." "When someone says half a degree more and it's the end of the species, that's not science, that's theatre," says Lindzen. Every apocalyptic prediction, from famine to ice-free poles to snowless winters, has failed. And they'll keep failing. 2030 will pass, 2050 will pass, 50 years will pass -- there will be no climate catastrophe. Lindzen isn't a fringe voice, he's a leading atmospheric scientist, author of nearly 250 peer-reviewed papers, and a member of the US National Academy of Sciences. Today's climate agenda, he argues, isn't about data, it's about power. "It's about controlling policy, controlling economies, and reshaping society under the guise of a crisis that doesn't exist." The real threat isn't climate change. It's climate policy.

Its impossible to get an accurate perspective on atmospheric gases from mainstream reporting. Consider the actual physical scale: Carbon dioxide makes up just 0.042% of our atmosphere. That is 424 parts per million (ppm). Visually, that equates to just 4 molecules out of every 10,000, or a single molecule in a crowd of 2,500. By contrast, water vapor can make up to 4% of the atmosphere in humid tropical regions, averaging around 1% to 2% globally. This means water vapor concentrations are routinely a hundred times higher than CO₂. Consequently, water vapor is by far the planet's dominant greenhouse gas, responsible for anywhere from 50% to 70% of the natural greenhouse effect. The physical driver of our climate isn't a trace atmospheric gas; its the oceans. The oceans contain roughly 81% of the Earth's entire mobile surface reservoir of carbon, while the atmosphere holds a mere fraction by comparison. Furthermore, the oceans absorb and store over 93% of the thermal energy in the climate system. Massive oceanic currents act as the planet's true engine, endlessly transporting immense stores of tropical heat toward the freezing poles. The Earth is a dynamic, interactive and restless planet, driven entirely by the laws of physics—not simplistic computer models or financial spreadsheets. Ultimately, CO₂ is the foundation for life on Earth. Through photosynthesis, plants use their unique properties to convert sunlight, water and soil nutrients into vital glucose energy and oxygen. Because of this, CO₂ underpins every single food chain on Earth. It is also a fundamental building block for marine life, utilised by organisms like oysters, clams, corals, and tiny swimming sea snails (pteropods) to build their shells. Between 50% and 85% of the world's photosynthesis and oxygen production occurs in the oceans, driven by microscopic phytoplankton. These tiny organisms form the bedrock of the entire global marine food web. The 'code red' climate catastrophe unravels under the sheer weight of planetary reality.

In 1959, the US Army built Camp Century under Greenland's ice, complete with tunnels, labs, and even a nuclear reactor. It was abandoned in 1967. Since then, the official story has been that Greenland is melting away. But in reality, Camp Century hasn't emerged, it's been buried deeper. Recent radar scans showed the base entombed beneath around 100 feet of accumulated snow and ice. Far from vanishing, Greenland keeps burying the past under layer after layer of new snow. It isn't the ice that's melting, it's the narrative.

The mainstream media and scientific bodies chose to ignore a climate declaration, signed by over 1,100 (and later, even more) scientists. The 'World Climate Declaration' was published in September, 2019, by CLINTEL (Climate Intelligence), a Netherlands-based group. It argued there is no climate crisis or emergency and criticised overreliance on worst-case scenarios based on computer modelling. The declaration pointed to empirical data of biomass expansion, noting that 'CO2 is plant food'—a reality now backed by verified NASA satellite data showing significant global greening over recent decades. They emphasised the biological benefits of CO2 for global greening, and argued that climate policies must respect economic realities and national sovereignty. However, critics of this paper were more focussed on who signed it, saying only a small percentage were publishing climate scientists or paleoclimatologists. Many were engineers, geologists, or professionals from unrelated fields. This was a collision between an entrenched, centrally coordinated climate machine and a bloc of independent professionals, drawn from engineering, economic and industrial backgrounds, arguing the practical, physical constraints and costs of such an all-encompassing global energy transition. The declaration said climate models had serious flaws. But the climate campaigners were on a roll, and said they alone represented mainstream science. They had built a body of evidence on the calibrated data of satellite and ocean temperatures. The 'short-term pain of transitioning to net zero was preferable to the long-term instability and economic damage from uncontrolled climate change. This posture allowed them to freely portray the 'rate of warming' as unprecedented in modern human history. The mainstream media backed them. The declaration was labeled 'fringe' overnight by major academic journals. The economic fallout from dismantling the global energy infrastructure has in fact been colossal, now estimated at $275 trillion and counting. The 1,100 strong declaration did not break through into this entrenched policy circle because of its institutional barriers to outsiders. These doors were permanently closed. The UN, major central banks and Western governments were already colluding clandestinely with each other, plus global asset managers like BlackRock and Vanguard. They owned the science. They owned the carbon cash fallout. Now they owned the sovereignty as well. The climate narrative is high-stakes rhetoric, slick propaganda that downplays the gradual collapse of western economies, once based on cheap coal, oil and gas. This mainstream narrative is what captured the public's attention with its high-stakes rhetoric, bypassing the need for a professionally structured, data-driven approach that would be much harder for independent critics to dismiss. The campaign was spearheaded by claims of 'global boiling' - 'code red for humanity' rhetoric filled the news pages and dominated politicised shouting matches. The UN and associated bodies shifted their position from 'advisory' scientific panels to becoming the world's global economic managers. The conversation wasn't about atmospheric physics. It was about rusted-on, centralised, top-down control and ownership. But when policies move faster than engineering realities, like grid stability and battery storage limits, then economic hardship becomesss the inevitable price. That is exactly how it has turned out.