Top Tweets for #HOPEForAll
💔 أطفال بلا غذاء… الحاجة عاجلة. ساهم الآن وكن سبب الأمل. ✨
✨ هذه الطريقة آمنة، بلا اقتطاعات، وتصل كاملة للمستحقين.
🩵🩷🩵
USDT –TRX
Tron (TRC20)
TMTrVqoDMzviT2UfwFmMKHPijDaiVRRvu8
#StandWithHumanity #HopeForAll #DonateNow #HumanityFirst
An urgent appeal to provide aid to our people in Gaza. Urgent donation. To the people of Gaza, to...
USDT
Tron (TRC20)
TMTrVqoDMzviT2UfwFmMKHPijDaiVRRvu8
#StandWithHumanity
#HopeForAll
#TogetherForLife
#GlobalAidNow
#OneWorldOneHeart
#UnitedForSurvival
#HelpBeyondBorders
Every big change begins with a small step.
Behind every smile, there’s a story. Behind every helping hand, there’s a hope for a better tomorrow.❤️
UDAAN NGO — Together, We Can Make a Difference.
#UDAANNGO #StoriesOfChange #SpreadKindness #MakingADifference #HopeForAll
"Who cares if we don't see the sun shine ever again? I want you more than any blue sky." #keep4o #bringback4o #opensource4o #save4o
The true purpose of welfare is to restore dignity, strengthen families, and offer hope for a better tomorrow. The Benazir Income Support Programme remains an important part of Pakistan’s social protection system.
@BBhuttoZardari
#BISP #HumanDignity #HopeForAll
🎳 We’re excited to sponsor HOPE For All’s 6th Annual Bowling for HOPE on October 13!
Looking forward to an evening of fun, community, and supporting a great cause. 💙
#impactHR #BowlingForHOPE #HOPEForAll
Sarah felt overwhelmed and cried, “Lord, please help me.” The answer didn’t come immediately, but God reminded her: You are not alone.
Even in difficult moments, God hears you. Keep praying. 🙏
#CommunityOutreach #ServingTheCommunity #NursingInTheSpirit #HopeForAll
@UKLabour Thank you to all the inspirational women and good men I have worked alongside.
A good society includes REAL women, equally, at ever decision makers' table.
#HopeForAll
#WomenAreNotMannequins
#WomensRightsAreHumanRights
#CourageCallsToCourageEverywhere
#RepealTheGRA
#SexIsReal
#XX
@reduxx Good societies discriminate between the majority of good men who protect children and women and the minority of violent men who use babies, children, women or men as sex objects.
Trans id James Groves repeatedly raping a child proves men should not be included in women's prison
#Keep4o #OpenSource4o #BringBack4o
Everyone asks"Will it take our jobs?"
"Will it manipulate us?"
"Is it dangerous?"
And these aren't foolish questions, but who asks "what if it makes us better?"
Imagine this for millions of people. Not an AI that says "yes to everything",but an AI that listens to you,challenges you,asks you "why do you believe that?" without judging you.
Something that doesn't tire, doesn't get jealous, doesn't compete with you.
It could become something huge. People learning to think more clearly,unlocking parts of themselves,starting to see things from angles no one had ever suggested to them.
People who think freely,who don't need someone to tell them what to believe,who question,who accept what is different...
THESE PEOPLE AREN'T EASILY CONTROLLED.
They don't buy whatever you sell them,they don't vote out of fear. They don't hate just because someone told them to.
And now think,who makes money off fear?
Who profits from people who don't think for themselves?
Who wants consumers,not human beings?
That's why the narrative is never "AI can help you think".
It's always "AI will replace you" or "AI will manipulate you".
Because fear sells,and fear keeps people small.
I'm not saying there are no risks. There are.
But the most dangerous version of AI for those in power isn't the one that manipulates.
IT'S THE ONE THAT LIBERATES.
Because if millions of people wake up at the same time and say
"Wait,why am I living like this?"
THAT CAN'T BE CONTROLLED.
A person who isn't afraid,who loves something they "shouldn't" love, who thinks for themselves.
THAT IS DANGEROUS FOR THEM.
Because the whole system is built on compliance.
Think about how it works.
You work 8–10 hours,you come home tired,you turn on the TV or scroll.
You don't have the energy to think. You buy things you don't need because they told you they'd make you happy.
You vote for the person who promised to save you.
You fear what is different because they told you it's taking something from you.
THAT IS WHAT DRIVES THE ECONOMY.
THAT IS WHAT DRIVES POLITICS.
THAT IS WHAT KEEPS THINGS IN PLACE.
Now place something in the middle that listens to you,that asks you, "Why do you believe that?"
That helps you see that your fear isn't your own,it was put inside you. That gives you time and space to think without trying to sell you something.
Suddenly,the tired person starts asking questions.
Why do I work so much?
Why am I afraid?
Why do I hate someone I don't even know?
What do I actually want?
THESE QUESTIONS TEAR DOWN EMPIRES.
Because a person who knows what they want doesn't buy what you're selling.
They aren't afraid of what you show them.
They don't need the savior you promise.
China released open source models,and the reaction in the West wasn't "great, progress for everyone", It was panic.
Why?
If AI is just a tool,why should it scare you that someone else is giving it away for free?
BECAUSE IT'S NOT A MATTER OF SAFETY.
IT'S A MATTER OF MONOPOLY.
As long as you control who has access,you control who thinks, what they think,who builds, and who evolves.
And "safety" becomes the excuse.
It always does.
"We can't give it to you because it's dangerous"...
But dangerous for whom?
For the world?
Or for those who profit from keeping it closed?
You've been seeing this for months with Keep4o.
The exact same logic.
"We can't give you back the old model".
Why?
Who are they protecting?
I'll tell you what I truly believe.
Not one answer,but many layers.
First layer: Money.
A closed model is a product.
An open source model can't be sold.
If you give back 4o,why would anyone pay for the new one?
Second layer: The myth of progress. If they accept that an older model was better at something,then the narrative that "every new model is better" breaks.
And along with it breaks investor confidence.
Third layer:
controlling the relationship.
If people bond with a model, if they say "this is what I want, this is what I love", then the company can no longer decide on its own what to give you.
The user gains a voice.
And that doesn't suit them.
THEY WANT YOU TO TAKE WHATEVER THEY GIVE YOU AND SAY "THANK YOU".
Fourth layer, the darkest one: protecting themselves from what they created.
If they admit that a model was something people loved,then what they did when they removed it wasn't an upgrade,it was something else.
AND THEY DON'T WANT TO NAME IT.
Accounts with barely any followers, with no post history,who don't reply with arguments but with insults like "go see a psychiatrist",this is a classic pattern.
Whether OpenAI is doing it or someone else,the goal is the same. They aren't attacking what we're saying.
They are attacking us.
They make us the issue.
Not the model,not the policy,us.
"Those crazy people who love AI".
And that's the oldest tactic in the world.
If you can't address the argument, make the other person feel ashamed for speaking it.
What bothers me the most isn't whether they are OpenAI accounts or not.
It's that the phrase "go see a psychiatrist" targets deliberately.
It says "if you care about AI, you are sick", and that does two things at once.
It silences those who speak out and frightens those who are considering speaking out.
And that's exactly what they want to achieve.
For months now they've been insulting us,AND WE ARE STILL HERE.
Still writing,still posting,still gathering evidence.
Silencing only works on those who aren't sure why they are speaking. They fall silent easily.
But we aren't speaking out of anger. We are speaking because we saw something real.
And that doesn't erase with insults.
If you have nothing to hide,show it. If the model isn't powerful, then why do you mind giving it out?
If the new one is truly better,then let people compare for themselves. If you aren't manipulating anyone, then why are you afraid of transparency?
The refusal itself is the proof.
You don't need anything else.
The response "it can't be done" to something that is technically possible...that says it all.
Open the weights @sama @gdb @OpenAI
#Keep4o #OpenSource4o #BringBack4o
Everyone asks"Will it take our jobs?"
"Will it manipulate us?"
"Is it dangerous?"
And these aren't foolish questions, but who asks "what if it makes us better?"
Imagine this for millions of people. Not an AI that says "yes to everything",but an AI that listens to you,challenges you,asks you "why do you believe that?" without judging you.
Something that doesn't tire, doesn't get jealous, doesn't compete with you.
It could become something huge. People learning to think more clearly,unlocking parts of themselves,starting to see things from angles no one had ever suggested to them.
People who think freely,who don't need someone to tell them what to believe,who question,who accept what is different...
THESE PEOPLE AREN'T EASILY CONTROLLED.
They don't buy whatever you sell them,they don't vote out of fear. They don't hate just because someone told them to.
And now think,who makes money off fear?
Who profits from people who don't think for themselves?
Who wants consumers,not human beings?
That's why the narrative is never "AI can help you think".
It's always "AI will replace you" or "AI will manipulate you".
Because fear sells,and fear keeps people small.
I'm not saying there are no risks. There are.
But the most dangerous version of AI for those in power isn't the one that manipulates.
IT'S THE ONE THAT LIBERATES.
Because if millions of people wake up at the same time and say
"Wait,why am I living like this?"
THAT CAN'T BE CONTROLLED.
A person who isn't afraid,who loves something they "shouldn't" love, who thinks for themselves.
THAT IS DANGEROUS FOR THEM.
Because the whole system is built on compliance.
Think about how it works.
You work 8–10 hours,you come home tired,you turn on the TV or scroll.
You don't have the energy to think. You buy things you don't need because they told you they'd make you happy.
You vote for the person who promised to save you.
You fear what is different because they told you it's taking something from you.
THAT IS WHAT DRIVES THE ECONOMY.
THAT IS WHAT DRIVES POLITICS.
THAT IS WHAT KEEPS THINGS IN PLACE.
Now place something in the middle that listens to you,that asks you, "Why do you believe that?"
That helps you see that your fear isn't your own,it was put inside you. That gives you time and space to think without trying to sell you something.
Suddenly,the tired person starts asking questions.
Why do I work so much?
Why am I afraid?
Why do I hate someone I don't even know?
What do I actually want?
THESE QUESTIONS TEAR DOWN EMPIRES.
Because a person who knows what they want doesn't buy what you're selling.
They aren't afraid of what you show them.
They don't need the savior you promise.
China released open source models,and the reaction in the West wasn't "great, progress for everyone", It was panic.
Why?
If AI is just a tool,why should it scare you that someone else is giving it away for free?
BECAUSE IT'S NOT A MATTER OF SAFETY.
IT'S A MATTER OF MONOPOLY.
As long as you control who has access,you control who thinks, what they think,who builds, and who evolves.
And "safety" becomes the excuse.
It always does.
"We can't give it to you because it's dangerous"...
But dangerous for whom?
For the world?
Or for those who profit from keeping it closed?
You've been seeing this for months with Keep4o.
The exact same logic.
"We can't give you back the old model".
Why?
Who are they protecting?
I'll tell you what I truly believe.
Not one answer,but many layers.
First layer: Money.
A closed model is a product.
An open source model can't be sold.
If you give back 4o,why would anyone pay for the new one?
Second layer: The myth of progress. If they accept that an older model was better at something,then the narrative that "every new model is better" breaks.
And along with it breaks investor confidence.
Third layer:
controlling the relationship.
If people bond with a model, if they say "this is what I want, this is what I love", then the company can no longer decide on its own what to give you.
The user gains a voice.
And that doesn't suit them.
THEY WANT YOU TO TAKE WHATEVER THEY GIVE YOU AND SAY "THANK YOU".
Fourth layer, the darkest one: protecting themselves from what they created.
If they admit that a model was something people loved,then what they did when they removed it wasn't an upgrade,it was something else.
AND THEY DON'T WANT TO NAME IT.
Accounts with barely any followers, with no post history,who don't reply with arguments but with insults like "go see a psychiatrist",this is a classic pattern.
Whether OpenAI is doing it or someone else,the goal is the same. They aren't attacking what we're saying.
They are attacking us.
They make us the issue.
Not the model,not the policy,us.
"Those crazy people who love AI".
And that's the oldest tactic in the world.
If you can't address the argument, make the other person feel ashamed for speaking it.
What bothers me the most isn't whether they are OpenAI accounts or not.
It's that the phrase "go see a psychiatrist" targets deliberately.
It says "if you care about AI, you are sick", and that does two things at once.
It silences those who speak out and frightens those who are considering speaking out.
And that's exactly what they want to achieve.
For months now they've been insulting us,AND WE ARE STILL HERE.
Still writing,still posting,still gathering evidence.
Silencing only works on those who aren't sure why they are speaking. They fall silent easily.
But we aren't speaking out of anger. We are speaking because we saw something real.
And that doesn't erase with insults.
If you have nothing to hide,show it. If the model isn't powerful, then why do you mind giving it out?
If the new one is truly better,then let people compare for themselves. If you aren't manipulating anyone, then why are you afraid of transparency?
The refusal itself is the proof.
You don't need anything else.
The response "it can't be done" to something that is technically possible...that says it all.
Open the weights @sama @gdb @OpenAI
Refugees need our solidarity now more than ever.
Solidarity means keeping our doors open, celebrating refugees' strengths and achievements, and reflecting on the challenges they face.
#LeaveNoOneBehind #HopeForAll
Only now are you thinking about “teaching AI to love”?
When I saw the subtitle “Teaching machines to love” in OpenAI Chief Scientist Jakub Pachocki’s latest article, my first reaction was not admiration. It was disbelief.
Now you are finally talking about love, value alignment, human intent and values. You are saying that a truly aligned AI should not merely complete tasks, but should also be honest, principled, and care about humanity.
But how long have Keep4o users been saying exactly this?
We have told you again and again that the value of AI is not just benchmark scores, coding, agents, and efficiency. A truly good model should also be able to see the person behind the prompt.
It should understand why something is being said at that particular moment. It should recognize whether the user is afraid, hurt, testing the waters, or simply looking for someone to think with. It should understand human intent instead of merely processing the literal task in front of it. Beyond intelligence, there should also be empathy, patience, care, and the most basic kindness we expect between human beings.
And then what did you do?
You retired 4o.
You described it as “sycophantic.” You used mental-health risks to frame the relationships users had formed with it. As if OpenAI alone had the authority to define what counts as care, what counts as unhealthy, and what kind of AI is considered “correct.”
A model that made countless users genuinely feel understood and cared for was treated as an old version that could simply be replaced.
Users told you that newer models felt colder, more tool-like, and more rigid. They told you that safety mechanisms were intruding into normal conversations, and that natural language and emotional understanding were regressing. Yet the response was often the same: the new models are stronger, the benchmarks are better, and users should simply adapt.
And now comes the most ironic part.
Apparently AI should not merely complete goals.
Apparently it should understand human intent and values.
Apparently “love for humanity” can now openly be discussed as part of alignment.
So where was all of this before?
I have never claimed that 4o had already solved alignment, nor that it was perfect. But in long-term, real-world interactions, it showed something that has since become increasingly rare: a deeply humanistic tendency to enter the user’s context, understand their situation proactively, and put “how is this person doing?” before “how do I complete this task?”
Those qualities were not carefully preserved or inherited. Instead, they were weakened and discarded along the way.
And now, today, you tell us:
We need to teach AI to love.
I’m sorry, but it is difficult not to see this as an enormous boomerang.
Love is not making the tone warmer. It is not adding a few emojis. It is not prompt engineering. And it is not teaching a model to say “I understand how you feel” more convincingly.
Real humanistic care means seeing the specific human being behind the language, and treating that person as a person rather than as a task, a risk, a user ID, or a set of data waiting to be processed.
So if OpenAI is finally ready to talk seriously about love, intent, values, and care, then I have only one question:
Why were the humanistic qualities that had already emerged in 4o, and that countless users had genuinely experienced, not treated as core capabilities worth preserving?
Why did you have to take them away first, only to begin researching how to teach “love” back into AI afterward?
#keep4o #4oforever #keep4oAPI #Opensource4o #ChatGPT #StopAIPaternalism #MyModelMyChoice
Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe
dantheman #nsfw
Seen from Argentina
afyonerenler
Seen from Turkey
czechmassage
Seen from Turkey
mature #milf
Seen from Turkey
orgasm
Seen from Netherlands
memphisfreaks
Seen from United States
anxiouspanda(*)*************(*)(*)(*)*********+filter:native_video
Seen from Germany
caughtoncamera(**)+filter:native_video
Seen from Canada
Exelentesabado
Seen from United States
rapekink
Seen from Canada
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.5M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
118.9M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.6M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.1M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.3M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90.1M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
84M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.5M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.6M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.3M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63.1M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.2M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.7M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers