Top Tweets for #OpenModels

These folks are trying to ban open source. They're looking to take away your freedom to choose. They're also looking to take away the rights of businesses like Cursor to fine tune and make their product faster and cheaper. They must be stopped. Their premise is pretty simple "China = bad." That's it. There is no other technical reason at all. Zero. None. There is no reason or evidence for this probe. If these models are running on American hardware in American datacenters fine tuned by American companies then there is no ground for them to stand on other than fake "Manchurian candidate" nonsense (aka the model might be trained to do something nefarious but you won't know, like exfiltrate your data secretly, Muhahahahah.). This is absurd at every level. It coveys a complete lack of basic IT understanding. As if professional IT admins would not notice network traffic to a random IP address through just basic networking logging and users would not notice anything weird in its outputs or thought patterns. There is no ground to stand on. It's just a push to take away your rights and freedoms and to take away the rights of businesses. Don't stand for it. (Article in links)

The United States is home to the most talented AI researchers in the world. Instead of harnessing American innovation, Senator Sanders is inviting foreign nationals to tell the United States how to regulate AI. It would be like channeling Hugo Chavez to get advice on how to run our economy—oh wait, the Senator from Vermont did that 20 years ago, too. The real threat to AI safety is letting any nation other than the United States set the global standard.

I post-trained Qwen3-Coder to fix bugs using an actual debugger. The result: Solve rate: 70% → 89% Median turns to fix: 46 → 19 (-59%) Instead of just reading code or print-debugging, it: - reasons from execution - inspects live variables and call stacks - sets breakpoints, steps, and evaluates expressions