Top Tweets for #PROSPECTIVE

In my opinion, the call to join the Abraham Accords is the US signalling that it is ready to negotiate its long-term exit strategy from the region as it transitions from the MIC’s forever-war model in the Middle East toward negotiated terms for the FIC. This initiates new negotiation cycles with each participating country, allowing the FIC to maximise asset acquisitions, infrastructure influence, capital flows, and long-term revenue agreements as part of the managed transition to a multipolar world, one increasingly negotiated alongside China and regional powers. Trump gets a useful political narrative and path to his Nobel peace prize and gets to take credit for China’s BRICS & GCC plan. Long-term followers of mine would have been expecting this signal next. It doesn’t necessarily mean every country joins. It means a new phase of negotiations begins, similar to how British decolonisation often transitioned from direct imperial control to financial, corporate, and institutional influence through the FIC. Military influence gradually gives way to financial leverage, equity purchase structures, investment agreements, infrastructure ownership, technology dependency, and sovereign wealth partnerships, on BRICS, GCC & FIC terms. That is the negotiation phase now beginning. Saudi Arabia will likely maintain the position it has held for decades: no full normalisation without a two-state solution. If Saudi Arabia joins after Palestine has been economically integrated into the GCC framework, then the signal of a new regional order has arrived. And no, Israel will not rule it. A Saudi-Iran rapprochement without sanctions, normalised through growing Chinese influence, creates a system balancing both the petrodollar and the petroyuan, while the UAE continues to be the region’s primary financial hub. Pakistan, Egypt, and Turkey, potentially supported through BRICS-aligned frameworks, become part of the broader regional security architecture. The Middle East gradually returns to its older identity as West Asia, while the MIC shifts its focus toward Europe and Latin America as the next theatres of strategic war profiteering, with the US remaining the regional hegemon but increasingly operating within a system ultimately controlled by the FIC. All laying the foundation for a new FIC-, TIC-, and China-influenced AI and robotics-driven global surveillance and policing architecture. A system where finance, technology, state power, digital identity, CBDCs, AI, predictive surveillance, and autonomous infrastructure increasingly merge into a single transnational control framework. The nation-state remains as the branding layer, but power gradually shifts toward integrated networks of capital, data, energy, AI, and security coordination. That is the long-term trajectory in my opinion.