Top Tweets for #SSGI

4 months ago

Next to statistics we provide examples on the website demonstrating key geometry preceding significant earthquakes using the latest #SSGI models. This is a work in progress and the list will grow in time. https://t.co/yIdisox2Gs

1

32

2

0

4K

4 months ago

With the latest #Solpage and #SSGI version we are updating example illustrations. This is the planetary and lunar geometry on 3-5 February 2023. Most critical was the convergence of Sun-Venus-Jupiter with Mercury-Sun-Uranus at Full Moon (Moon-Earth-Sun).

ssgeos_edu's tweet photo. With the latest #Solpage and #SSGI version we are updating example illustrations. This is the planetary and lunar geometry on 3-5 February 2023. Most critical was the convergence of Sun-Venus-Jupiter with Mercury-Sun-Uranus at Full Moon (Moon-Earth-Sun). https://t.co/gouP4ydy26

5

86

14

5

29K

5 months ago

2015 was the first year, with little experience. #Solpage and #SSGI didn't even exist. While we always emphasize that specific locations cannot be predicted, the 2015 time-frames marked as critical did have major events: 25 April - M 7.8 Nepal; 29-30 May - M 6.8 Alaska (US), M 7.8 Japan; 16 September - M 8.3 Chile (when Earth was between Jupiter and Neptune). This is still ignored by mainstream science and media. The truth is, mainstream don't support the very method of observing positions of the planets and the moon near the time of larger quakes. Very dense planetary conjunction clusters prove their influence. This needs to be addressed, not ignored! Consensus is agreement, mostly sustained by 'authority', but doesn't 'prove' anything. Only observational research and data analysis can serve as proof. https://t.co/BbsWruicuq

1

2

0

133

5 months ago

@grok @roula0001 @leb_now Explain "many misses", because most geometric convergences indicated by SSGI result in the typical temporal clustering of stronger quakes. It is demonstrated in every video. #SSGI has never been disproven or even addressed in debated claims.

hogrbe's tweet photo. @grok @roula0001 @leb_now Explain "many misses", because most geometric convergences indicated by SSGI result in the typical temporal clustering of stronger quakes. It is demonstrated in every video. #SSGI has never been disproven or even addressed in debated claims. https://t.co/imIIPLl9xx

1

3

0

182

SSGEOS

@ssgeos

5 months ago

Our website https://t.co/wdBFKRdhVN provides #SSGI graphs for both emphasized geometry and the most recent corresponding seismic activity. The geometry is always explained in detail in our latest forecast videos.

ssgeos's tweet photo. Our website https://t.co/wdBFKRdhVN provides #SSGI graphs for both emphasized geometry and the most recent corresponding seismic activity. The geometry is always explained in detail in our latest forecast videos. https://t.co/tI9QZ3GFKJ

0

88

5

1

17K

TheRedPixel

@theredpix

5 months ago

#UnrealEngine Vite, a look at how #Raytracing DDGI compares against DDGI + #SSGI [Tandem on the rght] #gamedev #rendering #screenshotSaturday

theredpix's tweet photo. #UnrealEngine Vite, a look at how #Raytracing DDGI compares against DDGI + #SSGI [Tandem on the rght] #gamedev #rendering #screenshotSaturday https://t.co/CvW8yjD241

1

17

0

3

2K

5 months ago

@grok @Sunwolf77 @StefanBurnsGeo @grok, you're wrong. M 6.4 Philippines around 03:02 UTC, right at the highlighted lunar peak on the #SSGI graph discussed as early as December 31st.

1

0

136

6 months ago

So if @grok claims that mainstream studies "find no evidence", then go one step further and ask if the underlying methods are similar. To date our #SSGI method has not been addressed much less "debunked" by any peer-reviewed paper!

2

36

1

19K

6 months ago

AI services like Grok are programmed to promote mainstream science at all times, even if the studies are incomparable: - #SSGI lunar peaks are defined by geometry of EM harmonics with the planets. - Mainstream studies focus on lunar phases only, excluding the planets.

3

81

6

1

32K

MinDos

@dosenkesmas

6 months ago

#SSGI #StuntingUpdate Refleksi Akhir Tahun: Progress Stunting Indonesia 🇮🇩🧵 1. Kabar Baik! 📉 Angka stunting nasional turun dari 24,4% (2021) ke 21,6% (2022). Big shoutout buat Kalsel, Kaltara, dan Sumsel dengan penurunan paling drastis. 👏 2. Bali Masih Juara 🏆 Bali sudah di angka 8,0%, jauh melampaui target nasional 2024 (14%). 3. Reminder Penting ⚠️ Stunting bukan cuma soal tinggi badan, tapi perkembangan otak. PR kita masih banyak, terutama di wilayah Timur yang masih di atas 30%. Resolusi 2026: kejar target 14% demi masa depan Indonesia! 🇮🇩💪 Apakah possible? Share pendapat teman teman! 👇 #Stunting #KesehatanMasyarakat #Refleksi2025

dosenkesmas's tweet photo. #SSGI
#StuntingUpdate

Refleksi Akhir Tahun: Progress Stunting Indonesia 🇮🇩🧵

1. Kabar Baik! 📉
Angka stunting nasional turun dari 24,4% (2021) ke 21,6% (2022). Big shoutout buat Kalsel, Kaltara, dan Sumsel dengan penurunan paling drastis. 👏

2. Bali Masih Juara 🏆
Bali sudah di angka 8,0%, jauh melampaui target nasional 2024 (14%).

3. Reminder Penting ⚠️
Stunting bukan cuma soal tinggi badan, tapi perkembangan otak. PR kita masih banyak, terutama di wilayah Timur yang masih di atas 30%.

Resolusi 2026: kejar target 14% demi masa depan Indonesia! 🇮🇩💪

Apakah possible? Share pendapat teman teman! 👇

#Stunting #KesehatanMasyarakat #Refleksi2025

4

117

24

14

5K

6 months ago

@grok @Sunwolf77 Let #SSGI become the standard one day.

2

1

0

470

6 months ago

#Solpage - our in-house software - is nearing its 10 years anniversary with version 10. Development started from scratch in Feb 2016, initially to compute alignments from #VSOP87. Today it computes angles, clusters, #SSGI, lists quakes and runs stats! https://t.co/amvVz8QRwb

ssgeos_edu's tweet photo. #Solpage - our in-house software - is nearing its 10 years anniversary with version 10. Development started from scratch in Feb 2016, initially to compute alignments from #VSOP87. Today it computes angles, clusters, #SSGI, lists quakes and runs stats!
https://t.co/amvVz8QRwb https://t.co/XQAR20rEVe

0

82

10

14

27K