Top Tweets for #SSRG

Three BBC “Journalists” at Scotland’s UN Conference in Geneva, Then Silence: A Plausible MI5/MI6 Operation 3 journalists from the BBC World Service travelled to Geneva to cover a historic UN conference on Scotland’s right to self determination under international law; organised by Liberation Scotland, the officially recognised Scottish liberation movement at the UN. They attended the whole conference from start to finish, observing every intervention & every exchange. Refused permission to film the proceedings, they were allowed to ask 2 questions at the close & to conduct short interviews afterwards. I was one of the interviewees. Before the event began I presented them with hard evidence of England’s colonial domination. I showed how the FCDO, the British Council & the BBC call Scots “English” & Scotland “England” every day in countries representing more than 3 billion people. I placed in their hands the official email of the English ambassador to Indonesia that endorsed this suppression of identity. Confronted with these documents, they could not offer a rebuttal. They understood, even if they did not admit, that the state parading as the “United Kingdom” is in reality England, forcing the English name onto every other nation under its power. Although I had kept a low profile during the conference, they asked to interview me afterwards. I spoke without ambiguity. Scotland is an English colony under occupation. The plundering of resources & the theft of identity must end. England is delusional cf. Brexit. We bear no hatred towards English people in general but we want English colonisers out. Our cause is national recovery. England would ultimately gain from the separation, because it would be forced to reinvent its future rather than survive through colonial appropriation. Then came silence. The BBC World Service broadcast nothing. Not a report, not a line, not a fragment of what happened in Geneva. 3 reporters were dispatched to a major conference at the UN headquarters in Geneva. They followed the entire proceedings, they allowed to ask 2 questions, they recorded interviews, & then they erased it all. In a supposed union of equals, in what is presented as a voluntary partnership, Scotland’s struggle for freedom was treated as if it did not exist. This silence cannot be explained as routine editorial discretion. It reads instead as a deliberate act. The pattern is visible: gather intelligence, contain the message, suppress the coverage. When journalists behave as spooks (and are?), the distinction between media & state security collapses. MI5, MI6, the FCDO & the BBC function as different branches of the same colonial apparatus. The Geneva episode illustrates the depth of Scotland’s condition. Scotland is not in a partnership, not in an equal union. Scotland is a colony. Colonies are silenced, renamed, denied recognition of their identity. Colonies are monitored, controlled, suppressed by the coloniser’s media. That is what unfolded in Geneva. Philosophically, this silence constitutes more than absence. It is epistemic violence, the systematic destruction of knowledge about the colonised; & propaganda through omission, the erasure of truth to maintain domination. This is enforced amnesia, where the coloniser ensures that the struggle of the oppressed is never seen, heard, recorded or publicised. The English colonial state thrives not only through the plunder of land & resources but also through control of narrative & memory. Scotland’s conference at the UN revealed this clearly. The silence that followed confirmed it. The episode proves beyond doubt that Scotland remains under colonial rule. The refusal to acknowledge the truth is not a mistake but a method. To overcome it requires exposing the silence & naming the violence; refusing erasure. That is the duty of all who resist colonial power. Saor Alba 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁳󠁣󠁴󠁿

There is no treaty. Why? Because the Treaty of Union, a forced, unconstitutional and unlawful contract between the English’s state and bought or threatened Scottish elites, was never implemented. Read that again. The treaty was never implemented. How do we know? It calls for a single kingdom, with a parliament represent it. There is no single Crown of ‘Britain’. There’s England’s Crown ‘extended’ Scotland and Scotland’s Crown made dormant while an English monarch claims its ‘rights, rents and privileges’. There is no single kingdom of Great Britain because a kingdom is the territorial jurisdiction of a crown. So two kingdoms remain, one set over the other. There is no parliament for a non existent single kingdom. Just England’s Parliament continuing uninterrupted while Scotland’s was abolished by royal decree. (And it has never reconvened; Holyrood is the Westminster Scottish Executive referred to as a Scottish Parliament and government when it is nothing of the kind.) The UK is the continuation of the state of England. The state of Scotland was extinguished, every lever and mechanism while England remained unaltered. This not the ‘union’ of the treaty. This is annexation. It was never voluntary because no agreement exists for adding Scotland to the English Crown and the administration of the English state. It is, in fact, colonisation by the purest definition of that term. We do not contest a treaty that was never implemented and whose terms were not just violated but never intended to be more than a political inducement accompanied by the threat of invasion and the bribery of key signatories. We must not support the fiction of a treaty based union by challenging an inoperative treaty but the fiction of any union at all when there is no no partnership whatever - only a trap, represented as a treaty agreement and revealed as colonisation as soon as the ink was dry.