Top Tweets for #TechERA
#Techera
Techera engineering
Ashish kacholia initially bought around 250 levels and continuously adding up.
Increased his stake in company from 2.11% to 3.57%🔥
Bengal finance and investment also holding 4.3%🔥
Totally, he is holding 7.87% in the company by this June 2026.
Here are the Listed players which are directly associated with Skyroot
- #SolarIndustries has been an investor in Skyroot since 2019
- #DiffusionEngineers, #InoxIndia, #Techera suppliers.
#Skyroot successfully launched the #Vikram-1 rocket on its maiden orbital mission
Here are the Listed players which are directly associated with Skyroot
- #SolarIndustries has been an investor in Skyroot since 2019
- #DiffusionEngineers, #InoxIndia, #Techera suppliers.
#TecheraEngineering #TECHERA #AerospaceIndia #PrecisionEngineering
The valuation paradox: TechEra Engineering is trading at a premium that its fundamentals don't yet support.
₹48.5Cr revenue. ₹2.77Cr PAT. ROCE of 7.59% — below its own cost of capital. Order book of just ₹46-47Cr. One moat factor: an AS9100D certification that any well-funded competitor can also earn in 18 months.
Yet the market is paying up. Why?
Because TechEra sits at the intersection of three of India's hottest structural tailwinds — aerospace indigenisation, China+1 manufacturing shift, and commercial aviation MRO. The market is essentially saying: the sector is real, the tailwinds are powerful, and this Pune machine shop has its foot in the door.
That's a valuation paradox. Not a fraud, not a bubble — but a market paying today for a moat that doesn't exist yet, an order book that hasn't arrived yet, and an EPS that is waiting for operating leverage to ignite.
TechEra is an underdog. The question isn't whether the story is real. It's whether the right events align in time.
Business story
TechEra was founded to solve a problem nobody else wanted to own.
When a defense PSU or aerospace OEM needs a fuselage assembly jig — the physical rig that holds an aircraft's body in exact position during construction — they face an impossible gap: software firms can design it, machine shops can cut metal, but almost nobody can do both under one roof with AS9100D certification.
TechEra does exactly that. Digital design to physical delivery — one company, one contract, one set of tolerances measured in microns.
Their CAD/CAM simulation team runs in CATIA and Siemens NX — the same software Airbus and Boeing use. That simulation prevents expensive trial-and-error on the factory floor. Output: composite layup tools for fighter jet wing skins, vertical fin assembly jigs, ground support equipment for active runways, and now — the highest-margin pivot — precision "flying components" that go on actual aircraft.
The growth trigger that was supposed to arrive: a ₹110Cr contract with Turkish Aerospace. It was cancelled due to geopolitical tensions before revenue could flow. FY26 revenue went flat at ₹48.5Cr instead of stepping up 40%+.
That single event is the difference between a stock that has already rerated and one that is still waiting. The capacity was built. The engineers were hired. The orders didn't come. Now the factory sits at 45% utilisation waiting for the domestic pipeline to convert.
Moat — No Moat today.
Entry barriers: Moderate. AS9100D certification takes 18 months and ₹15-25 Lakh. That blocks a corner shop. It doesn't stop MTAR, Sansera, or any well-funded competitor from entering. A certification is a ticket to the game, not a moat inside it.
Switching costs: Moderate. High during an active project — moving blueprints mid-build causes micron-level alignment errors. But at project completion? Open tendering. No long-term annuity, no multi-year supply agreement.
Production edge: Weak. No patents. No proprietary IP. The CAD/CAM toolpaths live in TechEra's engineers' heads — and heads can be hired away. No bulk purchasing leverage at ₹48Cr revenue scale.
Strategic position: Weak. ROCE of 7.59% is below WACC of 11-13%. A business destroying economic value is not demonstrating a moat — regardless of how good the strategy sounds.
Moat durability: Weak. 178-day debtor cycle. Low promoter holding of 36.89%. Geopolitical shock wiped the flagship contract. Moat is narrowing, not widening.
Valuation & the operating leverage slingshot
Projections based on management guidance (30-40% growth guidance for FY27):
FY25 A: Rev ₹49.9Cr | EBITDA 17.0% | PAT ₹3.2Cr | EPS ₹1.92 | CFO -₹2.1Cr | ROIC 5.3%
FY26 A: Rev ₹48.5Cr | EBITDA 17.1% | PAT ₹2.8Cr | EPS ₹1.86 | CFO +₹0.85Cr | ROIC 5.1%
FY27 E: Rev ₹68.0Cr | EBITDA 24.0% | PAT ₹8.5Cr | EPS ₹5.15 | CFO +₹4.6Cr | ROIC 11.5%
FY28 E: Rev ₹95.2Cr | EBITDA 28.0% | PAT ₹16.4Cr | EPS ₹9.95 | CFO +₹11.3Cr | ROIC 18.9%
The operating leverage math is genuinely powerful — IF revenue arrives.
Sales 2×. Fixed costs barely move. EBITDA 3.2×. PAT 5.9×. EPS 5.3×. That's the slingshot.
Forward P/E at FY28E EPS of ₹9.95 compresses to 16.6× — cheap for an aerospace precision engineer IF that EPS materialises.
Growth triggers:
✅ ₹170-180Cr active bidding pipeline — ₹35Cr in high-probability LOIs
✅ New 5-axis CNC machine commissioned — adds ₹40Cr incremental revenue ceiling
✅ Capacity ceiling rises to ₹105Cr at full utilisation vs ₹48.5Cr today
✅ MRO vertical targeting 30-40% of revenue by FY27
Red flags:
⚠ Order book of ₹46-47Cr covers only 59% of FY27 revenue target — 41% must be won fresh
⚠ ROIC still below WACC in FY26 — not creating economic value today
⚠ 178-day debtor cycle — cash conversion remains deeply stressed
⚠ Capacity ceiling of ₹65Cr (current) means FY27 ₹68Cr target requires new machine to perform immediately
Management quality & governance
Technically competent. Early-stage. Governance still maturing.
Nimesh Desai built TechEra's AS9100D certification, its DGQA approvals, and its relationships with HAL and defense PSUs from scratch — that's a decade of regulatory groundwork that genuinely isn't replicable overnight.
He guided 30-40% revenue growth. He didn't deliver it — but not for lack of execution. The Turkish Aerospace contract loss was a geopolitical shock, not an operational failure. Where he did control outcomes — debt reduction using IPO proceeds, machine commissioning timelines — he delivered.
36.89% promoter holding. This is the most significant governance concern. Under 40% in a micro-cap engineering firm with lumpy project revenues means:
— Future equity raises (likely, given capex needs) will dilute promoters further
— Voting alignment with minority shareholders is not guaranteed
— The 6.23% Ashish Kacholia holding provides some institutional confidence, but doesn't substitute for promoter alignment
⚠ 178-day debtor cycle with PSU clients — cash is trapped and TechEra must borrow to fund working capital while waiting for government payment
⚠ Related party transactions with SSN Engineering and Amarupa Developers require audit committee scrutiny
Order pipeline — the real picture
The order book reality is the most important thing to understand about TechEra right now.
Confirmed order book: ₹46-47Cr. Of this, ₹40Cr is executable within 6-7 months — covering 59% of the ₹68Cr FY27 revenue target. The remaining 41% must be won from fresh tendering.
Active bidding pipeline: ₹170-180Cr. But this number needs to be read carefully:
→ ₹35Cr in domestic defense LOIs — conversion probability 75%
→ Remaining ₹135-145Cr in speculative industrial automation tenders — conversion probability ~30%
→ Net expected conversion: ~₹65-70Cr — barely enough to hit FY27 target
This is the structural difference between TechEra and companies like Omnitech or Rossell: TechEra does not have a multi-year annuity order book. Every project ends, and the bidding process restarts from zero.
The inflection point — when this changes — is when TechEra wins large domestic defense platform contracts with 3-4 year manufacturing cycles, or successfully transitions a meaningful portion of revenue to recurring "flying components" that reorder automatically as aircraft maintenance cycles trigger demand.
Neither has happened yet. Both are addressable with the existing capability set.
Watch these specific milestones every quarter:
→ Order book to sales ratio crossing 2.0× — signals genuine multi-year visibility
→ Debtor days falling below 140 — proves cash conversion is normalising
→ Flying components reaching 15%+ of revenue — the moat-building event
→ ROCE crossing 12% — proof economic value is being created, not consumed
Closing — what has to change for the underdog to win
is the valuation a paradox?
Yes — and here's exactly why.
The market is paying for a business that sits at the right address (aerospace precision engineering), has the right credentials (AS9100D, DGQA approval, HAL relationships), and operates in the right macro environment (Make in India, China+1, 1,200+ aircraft ordered by Indian airlines).
What it doesn't yet have: a durable moat, a multi-year annuity order book, ROCE above cost of capital, or EPS that reflects the operating leverage that is theoretically sitting inside the business.
The valuation paradox resolves — explosively upward — if five events align:
① Order book crosses ₹100Cr — signals TechEra has won multi-year platform contracts, not just project tenders. This is the moat-building event.
② Flying components reach 15%+ of revenue — recurring reorders replace one-off tooling. Switching costs become structural, not project-specific.
③ Revenue crosses ₹100Cr — the fixed-cost breakeven threshold. After this, every incremental rupee of sales generates ~72% gross contribution. EPS doesn't double — it slingshots.
④ Debtor days fall below 140 — CFO finally tracks PAT. The company stops borrowing to fund what it has already earned.
⑤ ROCE crosses 12% — the moment TechEra stops consuming economic value and starts creating it. Multiple re-rating becomes structurally justified
The underdog is real. The timing is everything.
[Not investment advice, DYOR]
![ramesh_vd's tweet photo. #TecheraEngineering #TECHERA #AerospaceIndia #PrecisionEngineering
The valuation paradox: TechEra Engineering is trading at a premium that its fundamentals don't yet support.
₹48.5Cr revenue. ₹2.77Cr PAT. ROCE of 7.59% — below its own cost of capital. Order book of just ₹46-47Cr. One moat factor: an AS9100D certification that any well-funded competitor can also earn in 18 months.
Yet the market is paying up. Why?
Because TechEra sits at the intersection of three of India's hottest structural tailwinds — aerospace indigenisation, China+1 manufacturing shift, and commercial aviation MRO. The market is essentially saying: the sector is real, the tailwinds are powerful, and this Pune machine shop has its foot in the door.
That's a valuation paradox. Not a fraud, not a bubble — but a market paying today for a moat that doesn't exist yet, an order book that hasn't arrived yet, and an EPS that is waiting for operating leverage to ignite.
TechEra is an underdog. The question isn't whether the story is real. It's whether the right events align in time.
Business story
TechEra was founded to solve a problem nobody else wanted to own.
When a defense PSU or aerospace OEM needs a fuselage assembly jig — the physical rig that holds an aircraft's body in exact position during construction — they face an impossible gap: software firms can design it, machine shops can cut metal, but almost nobody can do both under one roof with AS9100D certification.
TechEra does exactly that. Digital design to physical delivery — one company, one contract, one set of tolerances measured in microns.
Their CAD/CAM simulation team runs in CATIA and Siemens NX — the same software Airbus and Boeing use. That simulation prevents expensive trial-and-error on the factory floor. Output: composite layup tools for fighter jet wing skins, vertical fin assembly jigs, ground support equipment for active runways, and now — the highest-margin pivot — precision "flying components" that go on actual aircraft.
The growth trigger that was supposed to arrive: a ₹110Cr contract with Turkish Aerospace. It was cancelled due to geopolitical tensions before revenue could flow. FY26 revenue went flat at ₹48.5Cr instead of stepping up 40%+.
That single event is the difference between a stock that has already rerated and one that is still waiting. The capacity was built. The engineers were hired. The orders didn't come. Now the factory sits at 45% utilisation waiting for the domestic pipeline to convert.
Moat — No Moat today.
Entry barriers: Moderate. AS9100D certification takes 18 months and ₹15-25 Lakh. That blocks a corner shop. It doesn't stop MTAR, Sansera, or any well-funded competitor from entering. A certification is a ticket to the game, not a moat inside it.
Switching costs: Moderate. High during an active project — moving blueprints mid-build causes micron-level alignment errors. But at project completion? Open tendering. No long-term annuity, no multi-year supply agreement.
Production edge: Weak. No patents. No proprietary IP. The CAD/CAM toolpaths live in TechEra's engineers' heads — and heads can be hired away. No bulk purchasing leverage at ₹48Cr revenue scale.
Strategic position: Weak. ROCE of 7.59% is below WACC of 11-13%. A business destroying economic value is not demonstrating a moat — regardless of how good the strategy sounds.
Moat durability: Weak. 178-day debtor cycle. Low promoter holding of 36.89%. Geopolitical shock wiped the flagship contract. Moat is narrowing, not widening.
Valuation & the operating leverage slingshot
Projections based on management guidance (30-40% growth guidance for FY27):
FY25 A: Rev ₹49.9Cr | EBITDA 17.0% | PAT ₹3.2Cr | EPS ₹1.92 | CFO -₹2.1Cr | ROIC 5.3%
FY26 A: Rev ₹48.5Cr | EBITDA 17.1% | PAT ₹2.8Cr | EPS ₹1.86 | CFO +₹0.85Cr | ROIC 5.1%
FY27 E: Rev ₹68.0Cr | EBITDA 24.0% | PAT ₹8.5Cr | EPS ₹5.15 | CFO +₹4.6Cr | ROIC 11.5%
FY28 E: Rev ₹95.2Cr | EBITDA 28.0% | PAT ₹16.4Cr | EPS ₹9.95 | CFO +₹11.3Cr | ROIC 18.9%
The operating leverage math is genuinely powerful — IF revenue arrives.
Sales 2×. Fixed costs barely move. EBITDA 3.2×. PAT 5.9×. EPS 5.3×. That's the slingshot.
Forward P/E at FY28E EPS of ₹9.95 compresses to 16.6× — cheap for an aerospace precision engineer IF that EPS materialises.
Growth triggers:
✅ ₹170-180Cr active bidding pipeline — ₹35Cr in high-probability LOIs
✅ New 5-axis CNC machine commissioned — adds ₹40Cr incremental revenue ceiling
✅ Capacity ceiling rises to ₹105Cr at full utilisation vs ₹48.5Cr today
✅ MRO vertical targeting 30-40% of revenue by FY27
Red flags:
⚠ Order book of ₹46-47Cr covers only 59% of FY27 revenue target — 41% must be won fresh
⚠ ROIC still below WACC in FY26 — not creating economic value today
⚠ 178-day debtor cycle — cash conversion remains deeply stressed
⚠ Capacity ceiling of ₹65Cr (current) means FY27 ₹68Cr target requires new machine to perform immediately
Management quality & governance
Technically competent. Early-stage. Governance still maturing.
Nimesh Desai built TechEra's AS9100D certification, its DGQA approvals, and its relationships with HAL and defense PSUs from scratch — that's a decade of regulatory groundwork that genuinely isn't replicable overnight.
He guided 30-40% revenue growth. He didn't deliver it — but not for lack of execution. The Turkish Aerospace contract loss was a geopolitical shock, not an operational failure. Where he did control outcomes — debt reduction using IPO proceeds, machine commissioning timelines — he delivered.
36.89% promoter holding. This is the most significant governance concern. Under 40% in a micro-cap engineering firm with lumpy project revenues means:
— Future equity raises (likely, given capex needs) will dilute promoters further
— Voting alignment with minority shareholders is not guaranteed
— The 6.23% Ashish Kacholia holding provides some institutional confidence, but doesn't substitute for promoter alignment
⚠ 178-day debtor cycle with PSU clients — cash is trapped and TechEra must borrow to fund working capital while waiting for government payment
⚠ Related party transactions with SSN Engineering and Amarupa Developers require audit committee scrutiny
Order pipeline — the real picture
The order book reality is the most important thing to understand about TechEra right now.
Confirmed order book: ₹46-47Cr. Of this, ₹40Cr is executable within 6-7 months — covering 59% of the ₹68Cr FY27 revenue target. The remaining 41% must be won from fresh tendering.
Active bidding pipeline: ₹170-180Cr. But this number needs to be read carefully:
→ ₹35Cr in domestic defense LOIs — conversion probability 75%
→ Remaining ₹135-145Cr in speculative industrial automation tenders — conversion probability ~30%
→ Net expected conversion: ~₹65-70Cr — barely enough to hit FY27 target
This is the structural difference between TechEra and companies like Omnitech or Rossell: TechEra does not have a multi-year annuity order book. Every project ends, and the bidding process restarts from zero.
The inflection point — when this changes — is when TechEra wins large domestic defense platform contracts with 3-4 year manufacturing cycles, or successfully transitions a meaningful portion of revenue to recurring "flying components" that reorder automatically as aircraft maintenance cycles trigger demand.
Neither has happened yet. Both are addressable with the existing capability set.
Watch these specific milestones every quarter:
→ Order book to sales ratio crossing 2.0× — signals genuine multi-year visibility
→ Debtor days falling below 140 — proves cash conversion is normalising
→ Flying components reaching 15%+ of revenue — the moat-building event
→ ROCE crossing 12% — proof economic value is being created, not consumed
Closing — what has to change for the underdog to win
is the valuation a paradox?
Yes — and here's exactly why.
The market is paying for a business that sits at the right address (aerospace precision engineering), has the right credentials (AS9100D, DGQA approval, HAL relationships), and operates in the right macro environment (Make in India, China+1, 1,200+ aircraft ordered by Indian airlines).
What it doesn't yet have: a durable moat, a multi-year annuity order book, ROCE above cost of capital, or EPS that reflects the operating leverage that is theoretically sitting inside the business.
The valuation paradox resolves — explosively upward — if five events align:
① Order book crosses ₹100Cr — signals TechEra has won multi-year platform contracts, not just project tenders. This is the moat-building event.
② Flying components reach 15%+ of revenue — recurring reorders replace one-off tooling. Switching costs become structural, not project-specific.
③ Revenue crosses ₹100Cr — the fixed-cost breakeven threshold. After this, every incremental rupee of sales generates ~72% gross contribution. EPS doesn't double — it slingshots.
④ Debtor days fall below 140 — CFO finally tracks PAT. The company stops borrowing to fund what it has already earned.
⑤ ROCE crosses 12% — the moment TechEra stops consuming economic value and starts creating it. Multiple re-rating becomes structurally justified
The underdog is real. The timing is everything.
[Not investment advice, DYOR]](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HMR4WLpbIAA1DLk.png)
TECHERA Eng had got orders worth 110 from Turkish aerospace, which they got cancelled after operations sindoor because they supported Pakistan.
From Techera management
Can Indian companies or government stop business with turkey companies ?
#techera
@narendramodi
#SME #Techera #TecheraEngineering
Techera Engineering H2 FY26 Concall Highlights
👉 FY27 & Future Outlook:
▫️ FY26 was positioned as a year of capacity and capability building despite the significant revenue impact from the lost Turkish Aerospace contract.
💠Management views it as a temporary geopolitical setback and remains focused on sustainable long-term value creation
💠 Guidance: 30-40% YoY revenue growth expected for FY27 with PAT margins targeted above 10%.
💠Mr. Nimesh although looking unaware at times during the call; expressed optimism, noting that FY27 should mark a return to a upward trajectory, with the team’s enhanced skill levels supporting higher output with only ~20% manpower increase)
💠Full-year revenue is expected to comfortably cross previous levels (targeting 75-80 Cr+), with H1/H2 improvements from new order execution and diversification.
👉 Notable Points:
▫️ Turkish Contract Impact:
💠Signed 110 Cr (5-year) deal for commercial components (~20 Cr annual).
💠Eight months of development, fixtures/jigs, and machine orders completed before communications ceased post-Operation Sindoor (May 2025 geopolitical event with Turkey-Pakistan angle).
💠Despite repeated follow-ups and even MOD outreach, it was written off, causing a major revenue shortfall vs. 40%+ growth expectations.
💠Management noted efforts to route indirectly but prioritized consolidation and profitability preservation.
💠Lessons: Diversify aggressively; they successfully offset partially through quick pivots to other customers.
▫️ Financial & Operational Notes:
💠Promoter stake sales (Dec/Mar) were for personal debt resolution — no plans for further dilution or primary raises that erode stakes
💠Emphasis on building investor confidence via execution.
💠Interest default was a short-term working capital timing mismatch (paid May after March due date), regularized promptly.
💠Expensive 15% NCD targeted for closure by September; average borrowing cost ~8-8.5%.
💠Significant capex (~100-125 Cr range referenced) already deployed — no major additional capex needed for at least 1-1.5 years; focus on monetizing existing assets.
💠Inventory/receivables rose due to new project ramp-up post-Turkish realization (Q4 was stronger; collections on track within 90-day cycle).
▫️ Revenue was ~70-75% aerospace/defense with new clients added.
💠Management addressed investor concerns on guidance realism, margin fluctuations (not seen as structural), and positioning for defense indigenization and HAL/IAF scale
👉 Order Book / Projects and Future Pipeline:
▫️ Current Order Book: ~46-47 Cr in hand, with ~40 Cr executable in FY27 (remaining 7-8 Cr spread over 1-2 years).
💠This is described as meaningfully higher than at the start of FY26.
▫️ Key Executing / Secured Projects:
💠Private aircraft OEM tooling set: Order received, design completed, manufacturing underway — full delivery targeted by September 2026.
💠Significant milestone as the company will be the sole provider of a complete aerospace tooling set for the aircraft, with involvement from National Aeronautical Laboratories.
💠HAL Insourcing: Already assembling sub-assemblies in HAL’s plant for over six months.
💠Tenders submitted for additional projects (expected decision within 60 days), enabling 20-30% more manpower utilization.
▫️Includes full HTT-40 aircraft assembly and vertical fin components (outsourced model).
💠Initial work under Techera brand; potential shift of larger components to Nashik subsidiary later based on HAL’s strategic decision for scale.
▫️IAF: Certified as authorized vendor for ground support equipment (GSE) across multiple platforms (e.g., Rafale, Tejas, and others).
💠This opens a major indigenization opportunity. RFQs received; first orders and 5-year supply licenses anticipated in 2-3 months.
▫️ Pipeline & Outlook:
💠170-180 Cr worth of RFQs/quotations already submitted and under discussion.
💠Expect 30-40 Cr additional orders in the next 4-5 months.
💠New customer acquisition (now 10-15 active aerospace/defense clients) and pilot projects are building momentum.
💠Revenue mix: 70-75% from aerospace & defense. Within aerospace, FY26 was tooling-heavy; FY27 shift expected toward MRO (potentially 1), followed by tooling and GSE.
💠International funnels and non-India customers also being developed.
👉Mainboard stocks often get all the attention but some of the most compelling businesses are hiding in plain sight — on the SME Platform.
👉Smaller. Less covered, though noisy at times. Yet occasionally, genuinely exceptional.
———
👉Introducing SME Gems — a new independent series on Hidden Champions of the SME Platform :
💠 OBSC Perfection
💠 Aimtron Electronics
💠 Yash Highvoltage
💠 CFF Fluid Control
💠 DSM Fresh Foods
💠 L.T. Elevator
💠 Monolithisch India
💠 GSM Foils
👉Across Different Sectors. One common place.
🔗 https://t.co/Sto1a1qHIQ
👉Stay tuned for more insights
———
⚠️ For educational purposes only. Not investment advice. Please DYODD.
#SMEGems #SMEPlatform #HiddenChampions #SME
TechEra Engineering (India) Limited H2FY26 Results:-
#H2FY26 #Stockmarket #Nifty #TechERA
H2FY26 vs H2FY25
Revenue 24.20 Cr vs 31.93 Cr (-24.21% YoY)
EBITDA 3.58 Cr vs 8.16 Cr (-56.05% YoY)
EBITDA Margin 14.82% vs 25.55% YoY
PBT Ex-Exceptional Items 0.51 Cr vs 5.85 Cr
(-91.19% YoY)
PAT 1.46 Cr vs 4.33 Cr (-66.33% YoY)
Other Income 0.26 Cr vs 0.16 Cr YoY
This H2FY26 Exceptional Gain of 0.87 Cr
📍 Quba, Azərbaycan
22 may 2026-cı il tarixində Quba şəhərində yerləşən Quba Olimpiya, İdman, Təlim, Tədris və İstirahət Kompleksində "REGİONAL EXPO QUBA 2026", "Rəqəmsallaşma və Regional Biznesin İnkişafı Sammiti" uğurla keçirildi.
#qiad #musiadaz #techera #REGIONALEXPO
#techera
Techera Engineering (India) Limited designs, manufactures and supplies precise tooling and components for the aerospace and defense industries.
Should target upper trendline again...
Ashish kacholia increased holdings last qtr
Techera Engineering was exhibiting in Aero Defence Expo in New Delhi last week.
I took the opportunity to visit the Expo, and decided to share my views based on in-person experience and discussions with Techera's Management.
#Techera #TecheraEngineering
https://t.co/35aRQaRUHp
TOP ANNOUNCEMENTS FOR THE DAY
#KEC: The company has secured new orders of ₹2,518 crores for Kavach, T&D and cables business.
#SUPREMEPWR: The company has received a ₹13.50 crore order from an EPC company in Maharashtra.
#TECHERA: The company won a ₹4.87 crore order for design, manufacturing, installation, and commissioning of aerospace composite layup tools.
#MASTER: The company secured a ₹3.35 crore order for the supply of plates and frames to an electrical company.
#FAALCON: The company has received a ₹2.45 crore work order from SS Technopark Pvt. Ltd.
#TRISHAKTI: The company has secured a ₹75 lakh order from Larsen & Toubro Limited.
X is overflowing with AI nature photos.
Every mountain, every sunset, every ocean wave; suspiciously perfect.
We’re losing the line between awe and algorithm.
#AIArt #AIGenerated #DigitalIllusion #ContentOverload #TechEra
Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe
momson filter:videos
Seen from Sweden
gooner
Seen from United Kingdom
omegle
Seen from United States
純麦わんたんめん
Seen from United States
RevoultionaryChampionship
Seen from Brazil
octokuro model
Seen from Poland
incestoconmamà
Seen from United States
voyeur
Seen from Germany
desi ai
Seen from India
VixenLifestyle
Seen from United Kingdom
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119.2M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
112M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.1M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.2M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.2M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
88.4M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
82.3M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
73.8M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
71.1M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.2M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.7M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
64.3M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
64M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.4M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
61.5M followers
X
@x
60.8M followers