Top Tweets for #ThisImageIsFine
"the Editor does not have sufficient evidence to retract the article"
What WOULD qualify as sufficient evidence, one might ask.
#ImageForensics
#ThisImageIsFine
https://t.co/hMEs7jjtBl
https://t.co/hfuelmrVR4

Instead of investigating properly, the journal issued a *corrigendum* ๐ฑ
"The authors regret that Figure 3D were mistakenly uploaded - corrections do not affect the conclusion."
The original figure was simply replaced with a completely different set of images๐ญ
#ThisImageIsFine

#ThisImageIsFine
@sciencedirect is allowing @DanaFarber authors to correct *five* sets of duplicate panels by sending in a completely new set of photos, because they could not find the 4-year-old originals.
https://t.co/dqdu2VKDa5


Eleven papers from this group fell under @ScienceDirect or @CellPressNews . Six of these have been corrected, but I cannot seem to find any email to me about that.
Bewilderingly, this paper got away with a correction.
#ThisImageIsFine
https://t.co/jWi1ixeDum

And which editor/publisher would want to address this fine image with a gentle correction - and still ask $36 for it?
Well, because 1 of authors is a senior editor of the journal. That is how you do it!
#ThisImageIsFine
DOI: 10.1016/j.nano.2017.05.001
https://t.co/NTX9HwqzKk

Moving on to this pearl. Reported to the editors in March 2020. @ScienceDirect wants you (or your library) to pay $42 for this piece of art.
#ThisImageIsFine
https://t.co/KYqyeumPXT

How about this one.
The Figure 1 overlap (note different magnifications but same scale bars) was addressed with a correction, but the editors ignored the big concerns about the murine duplications.
#ThisImageIsFine
doi: 10.1016/j.ccr.2013.12.007
https://t.co/W3Xed1ACd9

A selection:
This Blot Collage was addressed with a Correction.
"The publisher regrets that the authors mistakenly inserted the incorrect GAPDH line".
doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2011.01.012
#ThisImageIsFine @ElsevierConnect @sciencedirect
https://t.co/5r20x8Qbfk


Some scientists are fraudsters, but some scientific journals are too.
JBUON has been stealthily correcting papers like these (all four images from the same paper!). #ThisImageIsFine
This journal should be kicked out of PubMed.
https://t.co/5ouCaWGdmw

Some papers published by @ugent scientists - reported in 2015 to @PLOSONE - reported on @PubPeer in 2017 - but still happily floating around unaddressed.
#ThisImageIsFine

Some more beauties from scientists @KU_Leuven - reported in 2015 (to journal) and 2018 (to @PubPeer).
#ThisImageIsFine

"In Figure 2 of the original article, a band for clone PH14 was inadvertently duplicated from panel E into panel C."
Can someone help me understand how this could have happened "inadvertently"?
#ThisImageIsFine
#ImageForensics
https://t.co/rs9RBYnQjH

Last Seen Hashtags on Sotwe
MidnightBallad
Seen from United States
เธเธฑเธเนเธขเนเธเธเธฒเธเธเนเธญ
Seen from Thailand
momson() +filter:native_video
Seen from United States
ใพใใใกใณ
Seen from Japan
momson (***--------**)****+filter:native_video
Seen from Switzerland
ometv
Seen from United States
omegle
Seen from Turkey
japanese mom
Seen from United States
trichysadhana
Seen from India
เธซเธทเนเธ
Seen from Thailand
Most Popular Users

Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241M followers

Barack Obama 
@barackobama
119.2M followers

Cristiano Ronaldo 
@cristiano
111.9M followers

Donald J. Trump 
@realdonaldtrump
111.8M followers

Narendra Modi 
@narendramodi
107M followers

Rihanna 
@rihanna
98M followers

NASA 
@nasa
92.2M followers

Justin Bieber 
@justinbieber
91.2M followers

KATY PERRY 
@katyperry
88.4M followers

Taylor Swift 
@taylorswift13
82.2M followers

Lady Gaga 
@ladygaga
73.8M followers

Virat Kohli 
@imvkohli
71M followers

Kim Kardashian 
@kimkardashian
70.1M followers

YouTube 
@youtube
68.7M followers

Bill Gates 
@billgates
64.3M followers

Neymar Jr 
@neymarjr
63.9M followers

The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.4M followers

CNN 
@cnn
61.8M followers

Selena Gomez 
@selenagomez
61.4M followers

X 
@x
60.8M followers

