Top Tweets for #fcra2

India's Ambassador to the US, Vinay Mohan Kwatra tweets, "There are many misunderstandings in the media and in civil society about the proposed Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Bill(FCRA), 2026. Here is the Myth vs. Reality check. Myth: India is an outlier in doing this. Truth: The US has had FARA since 1938 and FATCA since 2010. Australia legislated in 2018, Canada in 2024. The UK's scheme came into force in July 2025. The EU is legislating now. Myth: FCRA specifically targets a particular religion or community Truth: Nothing could be farther from it. The Act applies uniformly to all organisations regardless of religion, community or ideology. Faith-based welfare activities, including religious education, maintenance of places of worship, and charitable work by organisations of every faith, continue to be eligible for foreign funding. Myth: The law will lead to seizure of assets of NGOs, including religious charities, places of worship, hospitals, schools, and charitable organizations that rely on foreign donations. Truth: India welcomes genuine international partnerships and has always provided a legal framework within which such contributions can be received and utilised. When a registration is cancelled or surrendered, foreign contributions and the assets created from them already vest in a State Government authority. This has been in force since 2010. It is not new. What the 2026 Bill adds is a designated authority to safeguard those assets — and a way back. If the organisation restores its registration, all assets and unused funds are returned in full. Places of worship carry their own protection. Where a cancelled association has created property connected to a place of worship, that property goes to another FCRA-registered association of the same faith to ensure continuity of worship. Myth: FCRA has adversely impacted the working of NGOs and charitable organization and the new amendment would further restrict their ability to operate in India. Truth: In reality, foreign money inflows into India have been rising, not falling. Foreign contributions to registered organisations grew from roughly $1.2 billion in 2010–11 to $2.67 billion in 2024–25. India has over 3 million NGOs. A bare fraction of these, only 14,450, hold FCRA registration. Thus, the overwhelming majority of the civil society organizations are entirely outside the Act. FCRA does not stop anyone from accepting foreign charity, research grants or humanitarian aid. It asks three things — register, receive the money through laid down process, report what you did with it. Myth: India is framing a new law to cut off foreign aid to civil society. Truth: Regulation of foreign financial flows in public and political spaces is a sovereign step driven by national security concerns. It is an accepted feature of modern governance in many democracies around the world. The first FCRA in India came in 1976. It was replaced in 2010 with a more modern framework, and strengthened by amendments in 2016, 2018 and 2020. The 2026 Bill and Rules are the next step in the same direction: more transparency, better governance, clearer rules. The fact is that the law does not forbid Indians from receiving foreign donations or shut down law abiding civil society. Tens of thousands of associations are registered under FCRA and routinely receive foreign funds for health, education, disaster relief, research and humanitarian work."

Christians have been in India since St. Thomas the Apostle traveled to the Malabar Coast just decades after the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ.   But despite this long Christian history, India’s Parliament is considering amending Foreign Contribution Regulation Amendment (FCRA) rules to permit government takeovers of churches and religious charities.   This is a clear attack against Christians. If this bill proceeds in this way, it would be a point of major concern in our bilateral relationship with India.

Noida, Uttar Pradesh: Former DGP Vikram Singh says, "It is being explained that the proposed amendments are not aimed at any particular religion but apply equally to all. It has become evident that funds received under the FCRA have been misused in several instances. Examples include allegations of religious conversions in parts of the Northeast, along the Pakistan border in Punjab, and the Balrampur case, where it is alleged that Changur received ₹400 crore and facilitated the conversion of around 2,000 people. These are only a few examples, but they indicate that FCRA funds have allegedly been misused for anti-national activities and to alter the demographic balance. Therefore, the government has considered these amendments necessary—not for any particular religion, but for all NGOs and organisations receiving FCRA funds—to ensure transparency regarding the source of the funds, how they are utilised, and to bring them under proper audit and oversight..." (05.08)

Christians have been in India since St. Thomas the Apostle traveled to the Malabar Coast just decades after the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ.   But despite this long Christian history, India’s Parliament is considering amending Foreign Contribution Regulation Amendment (FCRA) rules to permit government takeovers of churches and religious charities.   This is a clear attack against Christians. If this bill proceeds in this way, it would be a point of major concern in our bilateral relationship with India.

Christians have been in India since St. Thomas the Apostle traveled to the Malabar Coast just decades after the resurrection of our Lord Jesus Christ.   But despite this long Christian history, India’s Parliament is considering amending Foreign Contribution Regulation Amendment (FCRA) rules to permit government takeovers of churches and religious charities.   This is a clear attack against Christians. If this bill proceeds in this way, it would be a point of major concern in our bilateral relationship with India.