Top Tweets for #nmtrue

NEW MEXICO Very interesting results. The Republican Senate and Attorney General Candidates each got about 43,000 less votes than the Republican Governor candidate. Conversely, the Democrat Senate and Attorney candidates got around 40,000 votes more than their Governor candidate. Once again these fall into the >10% ballpark of ticket splitting required to produce these numbers. Plus New Mexico had no 3rd party candidates so this is a very clean look at it. So I would way "they" wanted to be absolutely sure they kept the Senate and AG in place. Governor they didn't seem to be worried about.

Very soon you will understand exactly why Maduro was captured and happily sings in a Brooklyn gaol❗️ Did you know 15 Venezuelan whistleblower engineers, who worked on the Smartmatic/Dominion systems, gave statements to U.S. agencies about how the worldwide voting machine scam worked❓ This is all going to be rather important. 😎 Enjoy ‘The Show’❗️ 🎬 📽️ 🎟️ 🎞️ 🍿

I'm not guessing about whether our voter rolls are automated. In New Mexico, the data shows repeating ratios where we see exactly how many Democrats register on a given day. And they ALWAYS outpace Republicans in lockstep. Decline-to-state voters track just behind Democrats. This is a controlled algorithm. The image with multiple graphs demonstrates how the rolls are inflated in lockstep in all counties on the same date and time, adjusted for population. When the pollster class presents data, but never considers how that data has been manipulated, any conclusion they offer is typically vomit worthy.

THE 15% BAND Look at this chart. 59 races. Senate and governor. States ordered from reddest to bluest in 2024. The solid lines are 2024. The dashed lines are 2026. The shaded bands are what moved. One formula fits all of it: Republican 2026 = 0.85 × Trump 2024 Democrat 2026 = Harris 2024 + 0.15 × Trump 2024 For every 1,000 Trump points, 850 stayed Republican. 150 landed on the Democratic side. The numbers: Senate: Republicans kept ~85% of Trump’s share Governor: ~86% Variation explained: 88% What makes it strange: It didn’t matter how red the state was. Wyoming, Ohio, Illinois, Massachusetts: same 15% (p = 0.69). The Democratic gain was sized by Trump’s vote, not Harris’s. The Harris part is zero. The 0.85 beat both standard election-swing models in every set of races. Drop any single state and the multiplier stays between 0.846 and 0.853. Why seats flipped: At 0.85, any state where Trump got under about 58.5% falls below 50%. Texas, Kansas, Iowa, Ohio, South Carolina, North Carolina: all under that line. All flipped. What this means: Midterms are messy. This one isn’t. Two sets of races, different candidates, different campaigns, and the same 15% decrease almost everywhere. A pattern this even demands answers at the ballot level: paper ballot hand counts, poll-book check-ins against votes counted, and voter files showing who actually turned out. The numbers raise the question. The ballots can answer it.