@GarethJennings3 Showing where a potential outfitting of MQ-9B w/ Saab AEW (LoyalEye) would slot into tasks where Wedgetail needs to be committed elsewhere.
At some point a dedicated drone AEW with the array along a larger length of the drones body than a podded solution...
@FennellJW Article from Aviation Week (23.04.25) quotes that adaptive cycle no longer being considered for GCAP.
https://t.co/tG4Ljm6F6W
Possible it could change before freezing concept & assessment in late 2027. Or that the engine has scope further down the line for adaptive cycle?
@DavidAChilton@buchmaru So far all 6th gen projects are considerably larger than any current 4/5th gen tactical jets. For analysis 1/2
https://t.co/TBL8QcvEhi
@DavidAChilton@buchmaru Very much so. Based off the recent BAE Brontanax CCA infographic, @buchmaru estimated 23m length. Which would be between the F111 (22.40 m) & Mirage IV (23.49m). Below GCAP is scaled to 20m I believe. https://t.co/JMsYbQtE4N .
@DavidAChilton@buchmaru "Further details.... revealed", original render July 25 as detailed in the full article. The quote was to point out that GCAP will be larger than the CAFD, with the text being the article URL, which X doesn't work with. Working link - https://t.co/MB9d0iG7Ed
@buchmaru Even considering it's not the final design. This infographic for the Brontanax maybe helps with size scaling of GCAP, if they're being somewhat accurate (maybe intentionally not so). https://t.co/VYDYzlSBcx
@fharris2011@militaryhistori@TimShipman A combination of several pathways perhaps given the sums required - defence bank & warbonds in near term. Medium / long term view - welfare reform planning in the run up to the spending review next year. One can only hope. (& multilateral mechanism a role for procurement later).
@McmeekinIan@FennellJW Brontanax looks to have greater range, payload & LO than most of the offerings in its price range. & seems designed with STOL carrier operations in mind from the outset. Any competition with other CCAs is hopefully there for keeping BAE price competitive more than anything else.
@navalhistorian Seems like trying to keep Lockhead on side whilst also hedging with Typhoon ECRS Mk2 etc + StormFighter (class 2 ACP) teaming as alternative bridge to Tempest. Actually sovereign (mission planning, spares), rate of software adaptation, weapon integration etc.
@FennellJW C-UAS: One Typhoon to 5 CCAs/ACPs. Quite the magazine depth for APKWS.
A-G: Might we see Spear3/EW & Glide finally put into production to arm Brontanax.
Carrier: STOL capability.
Escort & point defence(?): of manned ISTAR & refueling jets.
EW: detect, spoof, jam etc.
@RAeSTimR Looks like it may have a fair amount more range than the increment 1 US CCAs, given the wing shape/size & body volume. Perhaps aiming for it be able to fly with similar endurance to GCAP, or a future upscaled iteration. + the Vanquish requirement to provide AA refueling. @JonA2i