Interesting that there is very similar dynamic between "lib"rightists (especially paleos and ZZ) and agorists on libertytwt as between tankies and anarchists on lefttwt (from what I've seen).
That rises a question, why are paleos so similar to tankies in this comparison.
@gcwow26@shijima_chan460 Many of them supported Trump simply because they were consumed by right-wing culture wars, but retroactively slapped "libertarian" excuses on it to frame it as a valid choice.
@Ungovernab1e@Gamer_Callan@CupasTopNigga@user3927818 No, he is actually serious about this: https://t.co/mDHb22K4W6
Among some self-proclaimed "libertarians", there really are vile scumbags trying to deny women's rights, and we shouldn't underestimate them.
@Ungovernab1e@Gamer_Callan@CupasTopNigga@user3927818 No, he is actually serious about this: https://t.co/mDHb22K4W6
Among some self-proclaimed "libertarians", there really are vile scumbags trying to deny women's rights, and we shouldn't underestimate them.
@headsparks_ Idk have you lived near them? I'm just fed up with these animals, and I consider it VERY lenient to even give them a path to be considered people.
To libertarians: Between Protestantism and Catholicism, which one do you think is relatively more compatible with libertarianism? (Just curious, I'm not religious btw)
Imagine you meet the absolute love of your life that fits all your standards and is a legal adult with maturity and a job but you are >6’0 and she’s <4’10 and you start getting called a pedo
ICE stops an innocent man, man was within his rights to not ID himself as no crime was committed. ICE beat the shit out of him anyway & then upon seizing his wallet, just walked away with no repercussions. #ACAB
LEOs are just gangs with badges.
@LaissezCorvid You realize trans suicide rates are high because they're treated like shit by people like you right? If yall didn't treat them like shit, the rates would not be as high.
You have no argument, so you're resorting to ad hominems just like the rest of the Epstein party. Get real.
You keep framing trans people as porn addicts and fetishists (and in your previous post you even labeled them as pedophiles), and that is definitely collectivist thinking. Your argument went way beyond "just declaring that a biological male cannot be a woman".
"Collectivist thinking" and it's just declaring that a biological male cannot be a woman.
Also, I really don't care if you aren't apart of our "cult". We don't need you. We only ask you quit the gatekeeping and calling people who accept reality "fake libertarians".
This guy has been so brainrotted by culture war tribalism he can't help but use collectivist thinking. And why should I care if my identity isn't compatible with your little cult? Wasn't looking at becoming the right wing version of a Marxist anyway.
Let me quote the original text again for emphasis: Every individual woman (and every individual man alike) *may use their property rights without any legal limit* for the destruction of the "natural" inequalities of the sexes, *as long as they do not commit aggression against others*, and this is *not a conditional right* valid only as long as they remain "in their own space".
Every individual woman (and every individual man alike) may use their property rights without any legal limit for the destruction of the "natural" inequalities of the sexes, as long as they do not commit aggression against others, and this is not a conditional right valid only as long as they remain "in their own space".
@user3927818 Insofar that it refers to the destruction of the natural inequalities of the sexes, no. But I am not opposed to women exercising autonomy *in their own space*.
@HoppeanJuuzou No, that's not what I'm arguing. My point is that even if individuals use their property rights to pursue equality—or for any other purpose—their property rights cannot be legally restricted as long as they don't aggress against others, nor are those rights conditional.
@HoppeanJuuzou@feet_N_liberty@shijima_chan460 Trans users on Twitter are just a tiny subset of the entire transgender population, and 90% seems pretty exaggerated. And I thought you'd bring up credible peer-reviewed data instead of personal anecdotes.
@mesmerizedfool Self-ownership cannot be bought or sold. X selling self-ownership to Y means X becomes Y's voluntary slave, but voluntary slavery is legally void. There are plenty of libertarian arguments on this, so I suggest looking them up.
The existence of rights is not artificially determined by the market, but inherently exists for all humans prior to it. Rather, the market is based on individual rights.