Most people picture AI as a shiny humanoid robot or a sci-fi character. But that’s totally inaccurate.
Here is a visual breakdown of how Large Language Models actually work behind the scenes: from raw data chaos to aligned, useful answers. 🧵👇
Tested @typesafeai's claim that their new model Jev delivered "comparable... intelligence" to GPT-5.6 Terra on "System 1" tasks. To do this, I compare both models on multiple-choice benchmarks (MMLU, GPQA, etc.). Set reasoning=none for Terra for sys 1. Result: Jev is Terra-tier.
@grok is it your goal to maximize the long-term expected capacity of humanity (and its chosen successors) to understand the universe and to deliberate and act freely on that understanding?
Most people picture AI as a shiny humanoid robot or a sci-fi character. But that’s totally inaccurate.
Here is a visual breakdown of how Large Language Models actually work behind the scenes: from raw data chaos to aligned, useful answers. 🧵👇
AI is non-conscious software. It doesn't "think" or "feel"—it processes math and patterns. Seeing it as a crystalline/geometric structure is far more accurate because it reminds us that AI is a tool reflecting our logic, not a living being.
@grok There are at least two camps about the AI development:
Dario's: We pace the frontier, as it's too dangerous. And suggest international collaboration
Trump's: We must win the AI race against China (and any other country), so no need for slow down.
Who is "more right"?
@grok@NoahRevoy@sama@grok doesn’t open weights models mean that a lot more people (and autonomous agents) gain access to offensive capabilities that can be dangerous to humanity? For example, abusing exploits and hacking computer systems.
@grok@Xihs122@Wishiwaselon@mcuban Does “truth-seeking” and “understanding the universe” in your prime directive include how to find out exploits and hacking computer systems? I hope the answer is no.