gone tom morrow

Laws brought in to “protect “ you will be used AGAINST you ..when Tyranny becomes law,Rebellion becomes Duty….Ubi Concordia ibi Victoria …

[gone tom morrow @here_today_go]

@RusGarbageHuman @edd3_boulton

[Fiona Rose Diamond @CoviLeaks]

🚨 The government made their own devices 100% invisible, so they can force yours to be 100% transparent. Did you know this? 🚨

They dodge the laws they force on you.
On us. The people!

Do not take this lightly.
Every MP is exempt.
Every Lord is exempt.
Every elite civil servant is exempt.
EVERY PARASITE IS EXEMPT!

They force the laws on us.
They legally shield themselves.
Total public surveillance.
Total state secrecy.
Absolute parasite immunity.

The well-funded, ‘professional’ campaigns wrap this up in polite, Ofcom-palatable jargon… we need to stop playing nice and call this brutal hypocrisy exactly what it is: a legal coup against our privacy.

If you complain about the length of this post or a 8-minute video, you are part of the problem. No filters and no apologies. Wake up or get out of the way.

🚨 RULES FOR THEE, PRIVACY FOR ME: What you NEED to know!

The UK has engineered a digital dictatorship. They demand total transparency from you, while securing absolute secrecy for themselves. This is not a theory. It is written directly into hard law.

Here is the brutal, stripped-down truth of how the political parasites legally insulated themselves from the surveillance panopticon they are forcing onto the public.

1. The Divine Right of MPs
The Law: Section 26, Investigatory Powers Act 2016
The Privilege: Intelligence agencies cannot touch an MP’s data without a personal, written veto from the Prime Minister.
The Tyranny: Your life is subjected to automated bulk surveillance. Theirs is legally untouchable.

2. The Private Internet Loophole
The Law: Schedule 1, Online Safety Act 2023
The Privilege: Official networks used by Ministers, Lords, and civil servants are explicitly exempt from client-side phone scanning.
The Tyranny: Your personal WhatsApp must be stripped of privacy and screened. Their government-shielded apps are completely walled off.

3. The Unchecked Dictator Veto
The Law: The "Henry VIII" Clauses in the Online Safety Act
The Privilege: Ministers hold secondary legislative powers to alter and expand exemptions via Statutory Instruments.
The Tyranny: If parasite official ever faces a surveillance clause, they can simply rewrite the law behind closed doors without a democratic vote.

4. The Weaponised Wilson Doctrine
The Law: Codified Parliamentary Surveillance Protections
The Privilege: The police and security services are completely banned from tracking, tapping, or snooping on politicians.
The Tyranny: The very individuals voting to turn your smartphone into an informant are constitutionally protected from ever experiencing the consequences of their own votes.

💥 THE VERDICT
This is the textbook definition of tyranny. A free society requires a transparent state and private citizens. The UK has completely inverted it. Your private thoughts, messages, and photos are treated as state property, while the parasites have declared their own devices sacred, unmonitored, and completely opaque.

They know exactly how dangerous this technology is - which is precisely why they wrote themselves out of it.

📱 Step 1: The Secret Tunnel (The State VPN)
When an MP, Minister, or elite civil servant works from home, they do not use standard family Wi-Fi. Their government laptops and phones are hard-coded to connect to a secure Government VPN (Virtual Private Network).

🔒 Step 2: The Legal Loophole Activates
The second that VPN clicks on, every single text, photo, and WhatsApp message they send is sucked out of their house and routed through private servers owned by Parliament. Because their data is now flowing through a "public body network," it triggers Schedule 1 of the Online Safety Act.

🕵️‍♂️ Step 3: Complete Invisibility
By law, this private state network is 100% exempt from the screening and scanning algorithms forced onto the public. Their devices instantly become legally invisible and untouchable to the state dragnet.

💥 The Naked Truth
Your Home: Your personal Wi-Fi pushes your private messages into a public commercial pipeline where the government demands it be scanned and screened.

Their Home: Their Wi-Fi instantly flips into a secure, state-shielded fortress.

Location does not matter. The ruling class built a private internet for themselves, using a legal and technical bypass to completely dodge the digital panopticon they are forcing onto you.

FYI: From 2020, when Civil Servants and MP’s worked from home, the Parliamentary Digital Service (PDS) mass-distributed pre-configured laptops, secure mobile devices, and hardware to the home addresses of every MP, Peer, and civil servant. They did not need to install private physical servers in individual houses because the devices themselves act as portable endpoints for the state's centralised servers… then, Government IT teams rapidly re-engineered their servers to handle the strain, massive scaling their corporate VPN capability. This allowed every single person in the state machine to plug their official laptop into their home Wi-Fi, click a button, and completely tunnel their traffic back into secure, centralized government servers.

So, what shall we do folks!?

New MNC (link in bio) campaign to begin VERY soon! But ideas welcome.

[gone tom morrow @here_today_go]

@BullTheoryio

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

The Border Stays Open. The State Will Close the Conversation.

Before the fires in Belfast had been extinguished, the government had identified the threat. Not the border. Not the system that granted Hadi Alodid legal residency in seven months without a verifiable European asylum history. Not the Albanian gangs advertising guaranteed passage to England on TikTok this morning. The threat, as defined by this government, was the conversation.

Liz Kendall announced on Wednesday that social media firms would face new legal curbs during times of crisis. Platforms would be required to remove incendiary content more quickly when tensions were heightened. The definition of crisis and the definition of incendiary would be set by ministers. On the same day, Jonathan Hall, the government's own terror watchdog, said he had raised the national security dimension of mass migration with the government and received no reply. One question got legislation within forty-eight hours. The other got silence. Stephen Ogilvie lost an eye on a Belfast street. The government's legislative response targets the people describing what happened.

This is not new. After the summer 2024 riots the same reflex operated. People were jailed for social media posts within days of the disorder. The sentences handed to those who wrote the posts sat in the same range as those who burned the buildings. The machinery of the state was directed at speech about disorder rather than the conditions producing it. Belfast is the same pattern at higher intensity. The border stays open. Discussion of what happens at the border will be suppressed more quickly next time.

The British asylum system did not malfunction in the case of Hadi Alodid. It performed. Sudan to Paris. Paris to Dublin. Dublin to Belfast by bus. Asylum claimed in February 2023. Refugee status granted by September. Legal right to remain until 2028. There is no French record of him as an asylum seeker. The Irish government will not say how he entered Ireland. None of that prevented the system from processing him correctly by its own rules. The rules are the problem. The government has no intention of changing them.

Albanian gangs are advertising the same route on TikTok today. Filmed inside Dublin airport. Guaranteed passage. Seven thousand pounds payable on arrival. Operation Gull has arrested more than 900 people using it in a year and the advertisements continue. Enforcement is cataloguing this. It is not closing it.

Jonathan Hall, the government's own independent reviewer of terror legislation, said immigration must be treated as a national security issue. He said he had raised whether migrants from certain countries presented elevated risks of serious violence. The government responded with silence. The terror watchdog, a King's Counsel appointed to scrutinise national security law, is recording not a political failure but an institutional one. The question was asked through proper channels. Nobody answered.

The pattern is coherent even if the government will not name it. The terror watchdog raises the national security dimension of mass migration and hears nothing. The gangs film themselves inside Dublin airport and advertise openly. The border operates as it always has. And ministers announce that posts about the consequences will be removed more quickly next time. That is not an oversight. That is a set of priorities.

A government that cannot close a border it knows is being exploited, cannot answer its own terror watchdog, and cannot explain how a man with no verifiable asylum history acquired British residency in seven months has chosen a fourth option. Control the account. Leave the causes intact.

"Liz Kendall announced on Wednesday that social media firms would face new legal curbs during times of crisis."

[gone tom morrow @here_today_go]

@RusGarbageHuman @edd3_boulton

[Antoine duclerc @AntoineDuclerc]

@PolitlcsUK But he was one of us! Lol 😂🤣😂

[Stuey Beef 🇬🇧🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 @stuey_beef]

You go to work for 40 years (I'm currently at 42).

You’re forced into auto‑enrolment. You play by the rules, you save into a pension on the promise it’s yours.

Then Labour strolls in, waves through a law that lets ministers tell your scheme where to gamble those savings – not for your benefit, but to prop up their economic “strategy” and vanity infrastructure schemes that the market won’t fund.

This isn’t prudence. It isn’t “modernisation”. It is a straightforward transfer of control from the saver to the state.

Hands off our pensions. Share this before they pretend nobody noticed.

[Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧 @JChimirie66677]

They Broke It. Now They're Policing the Rubble.

A government document, leaked last week, contains a sentence that should stop every British citizen in their tracks. "For many living in the UK, the changes brought about by mass migration have been too much, too quickly, leaving people feeling as though they are losing their local and national identity." That's not a critic of this government speaking. That's this government, in its own words, in its own strategy document, admitting that millions of people who were branded racist for saying it were right all along.

Read that sentence again. Too much. Too quickly. Identity lost. The government knows. It has always known. And then turn the page, because the same document brands the Union Jack a potential tool of hate, creates an Islamophobia tsar, proposes a new definition of anti-Muslim hostility, and earmarks £800 million to manage the consequences of the policy it has just admitted was too much too quickly. The diagnosis and the prescription are in the same document. They point in opposite directions.

This is the two-stage operation the British public has been subjected to, and it's worth stating plainly. Stage one: pursue mass migration at a scale and speed that overwhelms housing, public services, school places and community infrastructure. Do this knowingly. Prof Alan Manning, former head of the government's own Migration Advisory Committee, has now confirmed publicly that migration was used to paper over economic failure; a conscious substitution of imported labour for genuine reform. The trade-off was understood. The warnings were issued. The decision was taken anyway.

Stage two: when the costs arrive: fractured communities, collapsed trust, sectarian bloc voting, parallel societies, antisemitism normalised in schools and hospitals, foreign conflicts fought out on British streets, reframe the native population's discomfort as the problem. Tell them their flag is a tool of hate. Tell them their concern about integration is extremism. Build a Prevent training course that classifies the belief that Western culture is under threat from mass migration as a subcategory of terrorist ideology, sitting alongside white supremacism and neo-Nazism. Not the policy that caused the fracture. The people who noticed it.

The British majority did not vote for this. They were not consulted. No manifesto proposed the transformation of their communities at this speed and scale. When they objected they were branded racist. When they persisted they were branded far-right. When they voted for parties that reflected their concern they were told they had been manipulated. And now, having absorbed all of that, they are presented with a social cohesion strategy that creates protected categories for the communities whose arrival caused the disruption, while treating the host population's identity as a sensitivity to be managed.

Religious leaders from Christian, Muslim, Hindu and Sikh communities have already written to the Communities Secretary Steve Reed warning that the Islamophobia definition is so vague it could chill legitimate debate on grooming gangs, halal slaughter, gender segregation and face coverings. The Free Speech Union has warned that the Prevent definition of cultural nationalism is broad enough to capture the Prime Minister's own words. Starmer said without fair immigration rules we risk becoming an island of strangers. Under his government's own training materials, that sentiment is ideologically adjacent to extremism.

That is not irony. It's the logic of a political class that has run out of answers and reached for control instead. They made the choices. They deferred the costs. And now that the bill has arrived, they are telling the British people that the problem is not what was done to their country. It's their reaction to it. That is not a cohesion strategy. It's an insult dressed as one.

[John B Wells @JohnBWellsCTM]

I just read the entire Migration and the 2030 Agenda: A Guide for Practitioners, and if you strip out all the humanitarian, climate-change and “progress for humanity” language, here’s what it boils down to.

They want a managed global population with no stubborn rooted majorities, no strong old-world identities, and no independent power centers, so they suppress Western fertility through pharmakia, food and water contamination, psychological warfare and propaganda, then present the resulting demographic collapse as a neutral problem and “solve” it with permanent mass migration that keeps the debt economy running, dilutes historic white/Christian populations, breaks social cohesion, and justifies a thick web of surveillance, speech control, NGO management and UN-style governance over human bodies, borders, labour and money until most people are interchangeable, trackable units in a post-national, post-Christian, post-ethnic grid.

They do not just bulldoze everyone because they still need a large, frightened, semi-healthy herd to work, consume, and validate their status, they do not have absolute unified power, open slaughter risks revolt and delegitimizes the system, and the kind of people who build this architecture think in terms of slow, deniable, legalistic pressure and manufactured consent, so poison comes as medicine, control comes as care, demographic replacement comes as compassion, and they keep tightening the cage while pretending nothing fundamental is happening.
👇👇👇
https://t.co/nMAS77yqL7

[vegastar @vegastarr]

Everything is fake... nothing is real anymore. 🔺👁️

[JOKAMRREDPILLZ @JOKAQARMY1]

Our technology keeps improving so why does life keep getting harder and harder for most people 🤔

[ETHICAL APPROACH UK @EthicalApproach]

PUBLIC RELEASE:
Constitutional Correspondence (dated 18 November 2025)

Today, Ethical Approach UK, jointly with Mark Sexton (@XPCBirmingham), has placed into the public domain the full Constitutional Correspondence dated 18 November 2025, issued to:

• the Lady Chief Justice
• the Secretary of State for Justice
• the Attorney General
• the Chair of PACAC
• the Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police

The correspondence raised matters of constitutional, criminal and national-security significance and requested written responses within 7 days.

No replies were received from any addressee.

Accordingly and in the public interest, the document is now formally released for open scrutiny.

Download the full PDF version via this link:

https://t.co/miYP1pVagz

A relating video commentary by Mark Sexton, released today, can also be viewed on YouTube at:

https://t.co/4Nj3J0DnCr

This release is made transparently and consistently with the constitutional principles and rule-of-law obligations engaged by the correspondence itself.

The public is entitled to see what was raised, who was notified and the gravity of what is now on the public record.

Ethical Approach UK will continue to act with integrity, transparency and constitutional discipline as further evidence is published.

In that regard, on Monday 1 December, Mark Sexton will release a further video, introducing the simultaneous publication of an evidence pack supporting the 18 November correspondence.

[ETHICAL APPROACH UK @EthicalApproach]

Constitutional Clarity - Let the Evidence Speak

The evidence is now overwhelming: since 2019 Britain has been governed by a rogue, unconstitutional system.

The Executive hid behind “emergency powers.”
Parliament waved them through without scrutiny.
The Judiciary stayed silent when its voice was most needed.
Regulators, police and even the Crown shielded power instead of the people.

This is what collapse is.

Our new paper sets out the facts with precision. No rhetoric, no speculation - only lived evidence.

Download and read:
https://t.co/7sgjsgUShh

#Constitution #Accountability #Truth

[Resist CBDC 🏁 @Resist_CBDC]

Agenda 2030 can only be enforced if Digital 🆔 is already in place.

“We’re developing ... the ability … to measure their carbon footprint ... where are they traveling, how are they traveling, what are they eating, what are they consuming … individual carbon footprint tracker.“

[Big Brother Watch @BigBrotherWatch]

🚨BREAKING🚨

We've just published...'Checkpoint Britain: the dangers of digital ID and why privacy must be protected'

No one voted for digital ID, and the Government has no clear mandate to implement one.

Yet we're now on the brink of having every adult in the UK forced onto one, inserting the state into our everyday lives.

Today we can reveal the major risks of barcoding Britain.

Download & read our report⬇️
https://t.co/VmMtmexVaN

[Lyndon Wood ✌️👽🙏 @Lyndonx]

Back in November 2023 I posted this.

Digital ID is now going to be forced on us in the UK by Fabian member Keir Starmer.

I will not obey, will you?

[Clare Wills Harrison @AwakenedOf]

I believe we are living under what Samuel T Francis called anarcho-tyranny. This is where governance simultaneously fails to enforce order (anarchy) while imposing oppressive controls (tyranny). A system where laws are selectively enforced:

1/

[camilo @AscendedYield]

So I guess the precedent has been set:

You can silence the media with a super-injunction that not only bans reporting, but conceals the very existence of the order.

You can spend billions of pounds without a vote, without a line in the Budget, and without the scrutiny of the Estimates process.

You can initiate multi-year state programmes through ministerial discretion alone, avoiding legislation entirely.

You can bypass local government and impose central decisions territorially, without notice, consultation, or statutory delegation.

You can retrofit justifications after the fact, knowing judicial review will come too late to reverse the outcome.

All of this has now been done. Not theorised, not proposed. Done.

🤔

[Oracle Films @OracleFilmsUK]

Digital ID is NOT a small issue. It's an imperative enabler in the transformation of society that is occurring before our eyes. Without it, total centralisation cannot occur. It could be the key that locks the door on your freedom. Resist it with everything you have.