good stuff. ai should be engaged in more advanced intellectual work. instead of low leveled junior labor which brings about large shitty workout or e junk
Transforming human knowledge, sensors and actuators from human-first and human-legible to LLM-first and LLM-legible is a beautiful space with so much potential and so much can be done...
One example I'm obsessed with recently - for every textbook pdf/epub, there is a perfect "LLMification" of it intended not for human but for an LLM (though it is a non-trivial transformation that would need human in the loop involvement).
- All of the exposition is extracted into a markdown document, including all latex, styling (bold/italic), tables, lists, etc. All of the figures are extracted as images.
- All worked problems get extracted into SFT examples. Any referenced made to previous figures/tables/etc. are parsed and included.
- All practice problems are extracted into environment examples for RL. The correct answers are located in the answer key and attached. Any additional information is added as "answer key" for a potential LLM judge.
- Synthetic data expansion. For every specific problem, you can create an infinite problem generator, which emits problems of that type. For example, if a problem is "What is the angle between the hour and minute hands at 9am?" , you can imagine generalizing that to any arbitrary time and calculating answers using Python code, and possibly generating synthetic variations of the prompt text.
- All of the data above could be nicely indexed and embedded into a RAG database for later reference, or maybe MCP servers that make it available.
Then just as a (human) student could take a high school physics course, an LLM could take it in the exact same way. This would be a significantly richer source of legible, workable information for an LLM than just something like pdf-to-text (current prevailing practice), which simply asks the LLM to predict the textbook content top to bottom token by token (umm - lame).
As just a quick and crappy example of synthetic variations of the above example, GPT-5 gave me this problem generator (see image), which can now generalize that problem template to many variations:
- When the time is 11:07 a.m., what is the degree measure of the angle between the hands? (Answer: 68)
- Determine the angle in degrees between the clock’s hands at 4:14 a.m.. (Answer: 43)
- What angle do the clock hands form when the time reads 11:47 a.m.? (Answer: 71)
- At 7:02 a.m., what angle separates the hour hand and the minute hand? (Answer: 161)
- At 4:14 a.m., calculate the angle made between the two hands. (Answer: 43)
- What angle is formed by the hands of a clock at 4:45 p.m.? (Answer: 127)
- What is the angle between the hour and minute hands at 8:37 p.m.? (Answer: 36)
(infinite practice problems can be created...)
Everyone slap "AI" on whatever they're selling—from laundry machines to data warehouses.
If you're buying a laundry machine, you look for reliability, capacity, and cost.
You care that it works, lasts, and doesn't break.
Nobody buys a laundry machine because it has "AI".
in general modern nn method serves as way of stacking computation layer and gives a way to combine different branch like algebra, calculus, geometry, stochastic of “math” in a word
distillation of llama 6B let me remember of compressing large scale discrete logistic regression into single decision tree model in bank marketing scene about 9 years ago. both are using one model prediction to teach another