BREAKING
Over 1,200 illegal migrants have broken into Britain since Thursday.
Dutch economists found each illegal migrant costs their taxpayers’ £330,000. The UK Government’s MAC has cited this research.
So, our lack of borders since Thursday will cost us roughly around £396,000,000.
@ZiaYusufUK@reformparty_uk She’s played the public like fools, she never had any intention on delivering this policy, it’s diametrically opposed to hers and Labour ideology. It’s called politics, tell the people what they want to hear, then blame others for not delivering
The women and children of "Palestine" are "going through so much" because they are ruled by psychopathic Islamist genocidal lunatics who, by the way, @Palomafaith, would not allow THEIR women to leave the home dressed like that.
But let's just hope that being a useful idiot for the Hamas terrorists works out well for you.
The BBC ran this report about a school closing mid-way through the year, leaving 600 kids in the lurch, without mentioning Labour's imposition of VAT on school fees. The only taxes imposed on education in Europe. More than a hundred private schools have now closed their doors.
https://t.co/0fXx7x97k2
I’ve uncovered more than £1 million of your money going from the Ministry of Justice straight to pro-immigration charities.
Charities that campaign against border controls and help illegal immigrants stay in Britain.
This must stop. The Ministry of Justice exists to serve the British people, not to act as a cash machine for left-wing lawyers.
🚨 ISLAMIC BLASPHEMY LAW BY THE BACK DOOR 🚨
Kellie-Jay Keen (@ThePosieParker) has been charged with a criminal offence over posts criticising Islam, Muslim cultural practices and Islamism.
The Free Speech Union is proud to be defending her.
In a free society, no religion or cultural practice should be immune from criticism.
Since Labour came to power, the number of FSU cases involving people penalised for criticising Islam has doubled. It is now the single biggest category in our casework.
And now, with a state-approved definition of Islamophobia — rebranded as “anti-Muslim hostility” — things are only getting worse.
On Tuesday, Prime Minister Andy Burnham and Communities Secretary Angela Rayner met Muslim community leaders in Downing Street. Burnham took a swipe at critics of Islam, saying “some of the language” opposition parties use “is unacceptable”, and told the leaders “we need to find ways with you to demonstrate that more and more”.
We now await Rayner’s appointment of an “Islamophobia tsar” who will help enforce the definition.
All five hand-picked members of the Working Group that drafted it have concerning links to Islamist organisations, as FSU Research and Policy Director @DavidRoseUK exposed in his report. We have little hope that the appointed tsar will be good news for free speech.
Meanwhile, the Government is refusing to say who submitted responses to the Working Group, so we cannot know which groups shaped the definition. Islamists may well have had a hand in its drafting.
Support the FSU’s campaign against an Islamic blasphemy law — and the people penalised under it 👇
Angela Rayner is to appoint an “Islamophobia” adviser.
They'll enforce her “Islamophobia” definition, which Labour allowed extremists to influence.
Ministers claimed the evidence was deleted, but I proved this was a lie.
It's still kept secret. Rayner must end the cover up.
It’s pretty clear now Restore exist solely to undermine Reform. I originally supported Rupert because he said he’d do what’s best for the country. He isn’t. He’s handing election after election to Labour to spite Farage.
Congratulations to those 159 people that voted Restore. You now have a Labour Councillor. Maybe a nice migrant camp next.
You can lead a horse to water but you can't give it brains to understand tactical voting for your own greater good. 🇬🇧💙
Here is a riddle for you. How does the government hold a “public” Islamophobia consultation in secret?
Simple: it takes evidence only from organisations it has hand-selected, refuses to say who they are, and then, when an MP asks who responded, claim in parliament that the records have been “deleted”.
That, in essence, is how Britain acquired its official definition of “anti-Muslim hostility”, the rebranded version of the Islamophobia definition that Islamist groups have campaigned for over years.
@NJ_Timothy, the Conservative MP for West Suffolk and shadow justice secretary, exposed the scandal on The Brink this week.
It would be an outrage of transparency even if the consultation was about bus timetables. But the subject could not be more serious: free speech, Islamist incursion and the question of who gets to decide what Britons may say about religion.
And when Nick refused to accept the government’s word, he discovered that the records it swore it had “deleted” had been sitting on its servers all along.
Frankly, the whole thing stinks of an official cover-up on behalf of the Islamists. Ask yourself this: What has the government got to hide? Here’s what we know...
New post. Link in first reply
Oh Rupert, behave.
The Tory fixer Dougie Smith is playing you like a fiddle and your deal has been done.
You aren’t standing candidates in local elections if Tories are standing and they aren’t standing in seats if Restore are.
You are an online party and you will hand the country over to a socialist government until 2034 and destroy what is left of Britain in the process.
A vote for Restore is a vote for Labour.