@MintCarb Yes, that distinction matters. The authorised CBAM declarant carries the statutory surrender duty; contracts can allocate costs and data obligations. An indirect customs representative may also be the declarant. Commission guidance: https://t.co/KPC61wTJnI
AI pilot checklist: agree the export format, retrieval window, retention of prompts/logs/backups, subprocessor handling and deletion evidence. Test export before using live client data. Match the contract to the product settings.
ICO: https://t.co/8CpdaAeKqx
@1stopvat Deemed-supplier treatment is spreading beyond the EU — Kenya now treats non-resident digital platforms as deemed suppliers, shifting VAT registration, invoicing and collection duties to the platform.
@cleartheshelf The November insurance update matters even for sellers under the old thresholds — commercial liability insurance is becoming a marketplace onboarding baseline, not a size-based rule.
@setindiabiz TCS under GST is collected by the e-commerce operator, but the seller's job is reconciliation: matching the TCS shown in the operator's statement with the credit claimed in GSTR-3B.
@infoarbitrage Vesting schedules allocate equity but do not resolve founder dynamics — the disputes tend to come from roles, IP ownership and decision rights that vesting never touches.
@Singhlicious A binding term sheet is a legal commitment in substance, so the drafting question is which clauses bind — exclusivity, confidentiality, governing law — and which remain subject to the definitive SHA.
@edih_net@the_iapp The IAPP compliance matrix is a useful starting point because the EU AI Act applies to the same organisation in different ways — as provider, deployer, importer or distributor — and each role carries different obligations.
@El_Capitano_O The extraterritorial reach is the point Indian SaaS vendors most often miss: the AI Act applies to providers and deployers in third countries when the system's output is used in the EU.
@LuizaJarovsky Enforcement of the GPAI rules now sits with the AI Office, with the Commission and member-state authorities sharing the rest — which means vendor contracts need to say who carries each obligation when enforcement lands.
@rohit4verse The August 2026 enforcement wave is the point where the EU AI Act stops being a planning exercise: fines for the most serious breaches can reach €35 million or a share of global turnover.
@e_nation GPSR has been in force since December 2024 and applies to any business selling non-food consumer products into the EU and Northern Ireland — including online sellers.
@heynavtoor Merchant terms that cap liability and define the refund and dispute process do real work: they set the rules for chargebacks and unreasonable customer demands before those become legal claims.
@taxtmi New cross-border e-commerce inventory rules are pulling registration, traceability and seller-transparency duties into the compliance baseline for global sellers.
@FastSpring Without a US entity, cross-border sellers face the full patchwork — thousands of sales-tax jurisdictions and state-by-state nexus rules on top of EU VAT registration.
@IndiaBriefing The DPDP Rules give the operational detail that was missing: consent records, breach response, retention limits and the child-data rules all now have defined mechanics.
@IndiaBriefing The shift is real: under the DPDP Act, consent must be specific, informed and unconditional, and asking for blanket consent bundled with service provision is exactly what the framework is designed to catch.
@CollateData The penalty scale matters: the DPDP Act allows up to ₹250 crore per instance for significant data fiduciaries, and cross-border transfer failures are squarely in that category.