Will be inactive on social media for the foreseeable future. However I have created a telegram channel where I can continue to collate and post benefits without any distractions in sha Allah.
https://t.co/shOXTsZIj7
Where is @FarisHammadi and his likes.
Where are they to call out this Nifaq.
Where are they when their fellow countrymen and woman make propaganda like this which puts Muslim lives in the west at risk.
They are quick to point fingers at Salafi duat and scholars the moment they see a small slip, the moment they see a picture.
They will know the haal of every single scholar, scholars (who may have mistakes) but at are still at the forefront of teaching ilm, and calling to Allah and His religion.
Do not focus on the mess outside your house when your house inside needs to be cleaned first
3.9 million views, yet absolute silence from those who regularly attack Muslims.
Had any of their interlocutors uttered even 10% of this kufri filth, they’d produce endless videos and threads condemning them.
But when it comes from people of their own homeland, suddenly silence?
Silent when the likes of @amjadt25, @formulaRauda, and other enemies of Islam spew right-wing propaganda against Muslims in the West, fuelling hostility towards our masājid and our sisters, but now decide to be silent in the face of blasphemous statements.
I’m not against one loving his people or country, but to say this?!
Where is the غيرة protective jealousy for Tawheed, is Tawheed only what’s in the books with no practicality?!
Is commanding the good and forbidding the evil based on nationality?
Yes, condemning the evil is a communal obligation. But when self-appointed vanguards of the religion relentlessly hunt Muslims for presumed mistakes, yet remain silent before the real enemies of Islam, the resemblance to Khawārij behaviour becomes striking: harsh towards Muslims, yet soft towards their enemies.
@HelvacNaci@Alghurabaaaaaa He is washing. For washing to occur the water must be able to drip down the limb as he demonstrates whilst washing his arms.
📢 Summer Dawrah ’Ilmiyyah — London
📚 Two weeks of knowledge with Ustadh AbdulRahman Hassan & Ustadh Sadiq A. Yasin
🗓 Tuesday 18th – Sunday 30th August
🕐 5:30 PM – 9:00 PM (starting after ’Asr)
📍 Darussalam Masjid, Southall, UB2 5NS
Books to be covered:
1️⃣ Al-Wasiyyah al-Sughra — Ibn Taymiyyah
2️⃣ Kitab al-Tawhid — Muhammad ibn ‘Abd al-Wahhab
3️⃣ Kitab al-Kaba’ir — Imam al-Dhahabi
4️⃣ Al-Tadhkirah fi ‘Ilm al-Hadith
5️⃣ Kashf al-Shubuhat
6️⃣ Al-Arba’un fi al-Ahkam — Imam al-Mundhiri
7️⃣ I’tiqad al-Bukhari
Open to brothers and sisters. Free to attend, in shā’ Allāh.
Did Imam Ibn Rajab later on in life reject Shaykh al-Islam and do takfir on him?
This is a garbage nonsense claim found only from the bottom of the garbage bin from the likes of Zahid al-Kawthari (d. 1371h).
It is also claimed baselessly without reference or evidence by al-Hisni al-Shafi’i (d. 829h).
There is no basis to any of this and it’s pure fantastical garbage. Al-Hisni brings it with no isnad at all, decades after Ibn Rajab’s death, inside a book written for the sole purpose of slandering and attacking Shaykh al-Islam.
In reality, the Imam did later on in life disagree with Shaykh al-Islam and wrote a book refuting him in the issue of three talaq in one sitting, namely Bayan Mushkil al-Ahadith al-Waridah fi Anna al-Talaq al-Thalath Wahidah. This is a purely fiqhi dispute concerning merely one issue, not a refutation of his creed, or his methodology in fiqh.
In Dhayl al-Tabaqat which he wrote towards the end of his life no such garbage claim exists, and instead he describes Ibn Taymiyyah:
الإمام الفقيه، المجتهد المحدث، الحافظ المفسر، الأصولي الزاهد. تقي الدين أبو العباس، شيخ الإسلام وعلم الأعلام، وشهرته تغني عن الإطناب في ذكره، والإسهاب في أمره
"The Imam, the jurist, the mujtahid, the muhaddith, the hafidh, the mufassir, the master of legal theory, the ascetic. Taqi al-Din Abu al-Abbas, Shaykh al-Islam and the banner of the foremost scholars, whose renown makes needless any lengthy elaboration in mentioning him or any expansiveness concerning his affair."
(The Imam worked on it over a period at the end of his life, but had he gone against shaykh al-Islam he surely had time to change his entry)
And toward the end of his life he authored much in creed and fiqh in agreement with Shaykh al-Islam over the key issues he had contended with his adversaries.
On the science of kalam he wrote Bayan Fadl Ilm al-Salaf ala al-Khalaf, a defence of the way of the salaf and a refutation of the innovated science of kalam.
And on the building of mosques over graves, commenting in his Fath al-Bari on the hadith of the Prophet ﷺ cursing those who took the graves of their prophets as places of worship, he said that this hadith indicates the prohibition of building mosques over the graves of the righteous, which is the position of Shaykh al-Islam against the grave veneration of his opponents.
And Allah knows best.
Great opportunity to learn arabic with our Ustadh Idiris حفظه الله who many of you may know.
So much to learn from just his character, his manners and his enthusiasm for seeking knowledge.
Could not start your journey with anyone better.
In the 2026 manhaj they tell you:
“Follow the scholars, be with the scholars, take the advice of the scholars” and once you do that & follow their way, they turn around and say:
“you shouldn’t be doing that because that’s only for the scholars”
What kind of manhaj is this?