The 'science is only about results' brigade on here do not seem to understand that science is a social practice, one in which individual results are on probation till taken up by the community of inquiry. For this process to happen you need research transparency and integrity.
@rbnmckenna86@Left_Hegelian@_carlbeijer I think the idea is that it’s not clear what should count as authoritative unless one integrates some degree of rationalism.
I’ve finished listening to three Very Short Introductions (Jung, Freud, Kant) and have started three books: Koselleck’s The Practice of Conceptual History, Slobodian and Tarnoff’s Muskism, and Woolridge’s The Revolutionary Center (elsewhere called Centrists of the World, Unite)