ilhas

[ilhas @ilhasx]

@HallyuExtremism @countmaculad He's just another pseudo e-theologian who throws big words around to lull dumb niggas into thinking he's cooking

[ilhas @ilhasx]

@DC_Kakle @countmaculad "if the event that motivated a person to do something didn't happen, they wouldn't have done the thing"

woah..

[ilhas @ilhasx]

@FrancosGhost @countmaculad @EmiteRose >he determined it the moment he said it would be the case

So he changed the meaning of the words of the canon while simultaneously appealing to the canon? How does that make any sense? What I don't get is why he would argue rom canon law while also overwriting it when it suits

[ilhas @ilhasx]

@FrancosGhost @countmaculad @EmiteRose When has he determined that? And the canon in question has many reasons for the exception, not just "not knowing better"

[ilhas @ilhasx]

@FrancosGhost @countmaculad @EmiteRose That's what I said, so the grounds for the excommunication are to be found in and argued from canon law, not a unilateral decision from Leo using his authority as Pope. Canon law itself, like Agiat said when he mentioned canon 1323, lay out exceptions to the latae sententiae

[ilhas @ilhasx]

@Hildifons159911 @robbertleusink @countmaculad That's exactly why Rome is basing their position on a supposed automatic excommunication and not an actual canonical trial btw, they don't want a trial because that'll force them to lay out their position clearly which they're seemingly allergic to

[ilhas @ilhasx]

@FrancosGhost @countmaculad @EmiteRose This would be true if the excommunication being argued for by Rome itself were imposed by an authority (ferendae sententiae) and not an automatic excommunication because of a violation of canon law (latae sententiae), like in this case

[ilhas @ilhasx]

@cgiambr0 @SobriiEstote @IncredPapist_ Loving women is one thing, doing this "did i mention i have a gf?? I have a gf btw" shit is what's gay

[ilhas @ilhasx]

@TheSpockOfCock @GM20198114 @countmaculad That dude is one of the most retarded goyim out there

[ilhas @ilhasx]

@TradDesigner @ProtecttheFaith >Pope St Pius X would have excommunicated them for taking drastic measures in response to a crisis that he wouldn't have allowed to fester in the first place

Really?

[ilhas @ilhasx]

@GM20198114 @_BattleForTruth @Okoye_swa @OnePeterFive You should go back in time to avoid getting raped and ending up this mentally damaged

[ilhas @ilhasx]

@pacogarciaburgo @OnePeterFive Where's the lie

[ilhas @ilhasx]

@matthewpao1 @countmaculad the raped

[Astro @Thomisticae]

@LSKatholikos @ilhasx @albanianthomist Quite the contrary, If NO is true, God has failed to preserve His unblemished Church.

[ilhas @ilhasx]

@EsquireCatholic they should consecrate 8 bishops after this retarded PR stunt

[ilhas @ilhasx]

@BigModernism being rigid is bad but uhh i will rigidly deny you bishops because I can and want to. Oh btw uhh turn back or whatever!

[ilhas @ilhasx]

@DavidJalomo7 @TaylorRMarshall Apparently the infiltration was miraculously halted with Leo, or maybe it's TM's bank account getting "infiltrated"

[ilhas @ilhasx]

@codedcanticles @TaylorRMarshall What changed is that his jewish genes kicked in the second he was offered money to run lip service for "worst case Prevost", like he called him during the conclave

[ilhas @ilhasx]

@SeanGardne63876 @TaylorRMarshall That would be a sin against ecumenism and synodality