Iman Ebrahimi

Mathematician

[Iman Ebrahimi @imanebrahimi]

How do you see yourself in 5 years?

Me:

[Paata Ivanisvili @PI010101]

Seeing what is happening on the frontlines, I would say this: if we humans want to keep understanding the knowledge AI is producing at the current rate (new proofs, ideas, and approaches) we may need 10× more mathematicians within the next year than we have today.

[Steven Strogatz @stevenstrogatz]

"I present the case for total opposition to the use of artificial intelligence in mathematics."

= a view you don't often hear on X. But I am looking forward to reading it carefully, and if you care about math and AI, I encourage you to do the same. https://t.co/2LtcKWCkd6

[Mark R. Levin @marklevinshow]

I agree with Victor Davis Hanson, who argued on my Fox show that we should support an Iranian government in exile with Prince Reza Pahlavi as its leader.  And if the Iranian regime collapses, he would be a temporary leader during a transition period.  

ARM THE IRANIAN PEOPLE!

[Martin Bauer @martinmbauer]

To revolutionise physics we need experiments, not AI

[Iso (math fool) @IsomorphicPhi]

We should shorten "Banach space" to "spanach" for efficiency

[𝒊ℏ𝜕ᵗ∣𝜓⟩＝𝛨̂∣𝜓⟩ @al5awarzme]

May God guide us to the Russian way of mathematics…
Geometry

[Mathieu @miniapeur]

Terence Tao

[Alex Kontorovich @AlexKontorovich]

Since people seem to be confused about the difference between 100% and *all*, this is a public service announcement.

Theorem. 100% of all numbers are not perfect squares.

Proof. The number of perfect squares up to X is about √X; that divided by how many numbers there are up to X gives 1/√X, which goes to 0 as X -> ∞. Therefore 0% of the numbers are perfect squares, and 100% are nonsquares. QED

And yet 2*2=4! (And 3*3=9 and so on…)

[Yevgeny Tsodikovich @yevgets]

@AlexKontorovich

[Thomas Bloom @thomasfbloom]

Those interested in 100% results might like to know that the 100% version of Goldbach's conjecture (almost all even numbers are the sum of two primes) was proved in 1937.

89 years of work has not been able to turn that "100% of even numbers" into "all even numbers > 2".

[Iman Ebrahimi @imanebrahimi]

@E0S1N @saghhr__ @Callmesemicolon منم اومدم ایشون رو تگ کنم بگم عههه تویی اون پشت🥹😂

[Analysis Fact @AnalysisFact]

“Residue at Infinity” should be the name of a science fiction novel.

[Iman Ebrahimi @imanebrahimi]

@elonmusk No.

[Bruno @finnmarks_glory]

This isn't just abuse of notation anymore it's notation torture

[Iman Ebrahimi @imanebrahimi]

@ThomBrady5 Um ... what?

[Adam Aaronson @aaaronson]

Descartes introducing the coordinate plane: "It's not just x—it's y"

[Sabine Hossenfelder @skdh]

@LibertarianJzus economics models are good examples. lots of neat economic theories you can write down that are mathematically perfect, they just do not describe reality.

[Sabine Hossenfelder @skdh]

solving a maths-only problem is one thing. developing a mathematical theory for a real world problem is another thing entirely. confusing the first with the second is the very reason why physicists got stuck in the foundations, it's not a trivial step.

https://t.co/aoNiCWjdEb