Olivia
Online
Advocatus Diaboli
@imupinspaceman
You have a constitutional right to be a dumb-ass.
Joined June 2020
1K Following
120 Followers
933 Posts
George Orwell gel de distopya gör... EngelliWeb'in sosyal medya hesabı da erişime engelleniyor.
@_perezagusto Geçmiş olsun, ara ara geçmiş yazılarınızı okumaya geliyordum, üzücü oldu. Epey külfetli olacak ama hesap verilerinizi talep ederek başka bir platforma geçebilirsiniz. Bu hesap için de gelir yakında büyük ihtimalle
İnsanın hissettiği her şey yanıltıcı, vardığı sonuçlar güvenilir değil. İnsanın mantıklı olduğu inancı da ayrı bir öz-kandırmaca. Varsayımlarımız, yaşanmışlıklara, yaşanmışlıklar ise sezilere dayanıyor. Cogito ergo sum.
Bugün en az 80 X hesabı daha erişime engellendi:
• Hilmi Hacaloğlu
• Kısa Dalga
• Alptekin Dursunoğlu
• İnan Mutlu
• Başaran Aksu (yeni hesabı)
• Barış Övgün
• Razi Canikligil
• Emre Şirin
https://t.co/NawubuVOrq
İşim biter bitsin, Paradox'un tüm yaptıklarını belgelemeye başlayacağım. Kendileri için büyük bir çukur kazıyorlar
DSA Art 16 hazırlamak lazım, bu kabul edilemez
@HOI_Game @PdxInteractive @PDX_Dev_Studio @chakerathe
This thread is about what appears to be a serious case of anti-Turkish discrimination and nationality-based double standards in a Hearts of Iron IV community associated with Paradox.
A Turkish player was directly banned from the Discord while using Mustafa Kemal Atatürk — the founder and first President of the Republic of Türkiye — as his profile picture. He was not first politely asked to change it. The Atatürk avatar itself became the basis of the dispute.
When he challenged the ban and asked why Atatürk was supposedly unacceptable, moderators did not simply point to a neutral rule. Instead, Atatürk was described as a “controversial” figure and connected to the Armenian events of 1915, with extraordinarily serious accusations being directed at the founder of the Turkish Republic.
Turkish users then tried to defend Atatürk, challenge those historical accusations and ask why Turkish national identity was being treated differently. According to what we experienced, our responses were removed or hidden, users who objected were banned from the Discord, and the Discord was subsequently closed to new joins, preventing excluded users from returning and responding to the accusations made against them.
We then took the issue to the public Hearts of Iron IV Steam forum. There too, users complained that rebuttals were being removed or suppressed instead of being answered.
https://t.co/ipLKzEYeoy
This is no longer simply about one moderation decision.
It is about whether Turkish players, Turkish historical identity and the founder of the Turkish Republic are being subjected to a different standard from everyone else.
1/ Mustafa Kemal Atatürk is not a hate symbol.
He is the founder and first President of the Republic of Türkiye and the central statesman associated with the creation of the modern Turkish Republic.
An ordinary photograph of Atatürk does not inherently express hatred against Armenians, advocate violence, glorify atrocities or attack another nationality.
If a moderator wants to turn “Turkish player with an Atatürk avatar” into grounds for exclusion, the burden should be on that moderator to explain exactly what neutral rule was violated.
2/ The historical accusation being made against Atatürk is especially serious because the basic chronology does not support portraying him as the political authority directing Ottoman Armenian policy in 1915.
In 1915 Mustafa Kemal was not the Ottoman head of government, Interior Minister or the political leader controlling the central government.
He was an Ottoman military officer and commanded the 19th Division during the Gallipoli campaign. He became President of the Turkish Republic only in 1923.
Whatever position someone takes on the Armenian events, simply transferring responsibility from the Ottoman political leadership of 1915 onto Mustafa Kemal requires evidence.
3/ That distinction should not be controversial.
If @chakerathe or another moderator specifically claims that Atatürk personally organized or directed the Armenian events, then provide evidence concerning Atatürk himself.
Do not substitute:
“he was Turkish”
or
“he later became the leader of Turkey”
for evidence of responsibility for decisions made by a different political leadership in 1915.
Otherwise, Turkish users are effectively being told that their republic's founder carries collective guilt simply because he was an Ottoman officer and later became Turkey's leader.
That is precisely why this begins to look like nationality-based prejudice rather than neutral historical moderation.
4/ It is equally misleading to casually group Atatürk together with the belligerent dictators of World War II.
He was President when Hearts of Iron IV begins in 1936, but he died on 10 November 1938, before World War II began in September 1939.
He did not lead Turkey during World War II.
So treating Atatürk as though he were simply another WWII dictator requiring the same symbolic restrictions badly distorts the actual historical context.
5/ And this is a Hearts of Iron IV community.
National leaders, political ideologies and twentieth-century history are literally the subject matter of the game.
Atatürk is not some unrelated extremist symbol that Turkish users imported into a completely apolitical community.
He is one of the most important historical figures connected to the Turkey represented in the game.
That makes the decision to single out his ordinary portrait even more difficult to justify.
6/ The Armenian-events argument does not solve this problem.
I do not accept the legal characterization of the 1915 events that these moderators are attempting to impose as beyond legitimate disagreement.
Others are free to disagree with me.
But disagreement over historical or legal characterization does not establish that an Atatürk portrait is hateful imagery, nor does it establish that a Turkish user displaying Atatürk hates Armenians.
Those are separate propositions.
7/ More importantly, political recognition by governments or parliaments is not identical to a universally binding international judicial determination settling every aspect of a historical controversy for every person in every country.
The 1948 Genocide Convention defines genocide through both prohibited acts and the required intent to destroy a protected group in whole or in part. It does not itself constitute a judicial judgment on the events of 1915.
And the European Court of Human Rights in Perinçek v. Switzerland expressly did not decide the historical/legal classification of the 1915 events when deciding the Article 10 case.
So moderators cannot simply say “the legal question has universally been settled; therefore disagreement equals hate speech.”
8/ None of that means Discord has to host every opinion.
Discord's current rules prohibit denial of historical mass atrocities. That is Discord's private platform policy.
But Discord's same hateful-conduct policy also protects people against hatred and discrimination based on national origin, and its definition of hate imagery focuses on symbols used to promote hatred, threats, discrimination or violence.
That distinction matters enormously here.
An ordinary Atatürk portrait is not automatically transformed into hateful imagery simply because a moderator strongly disagrees with a Turkish user's interpretation of history.
9/ And this is where the anti-Turkish discrimination concern becomes impossible to ignore.
If historical figures and national symbols associated with other countries are tolerated, yet the founder of the Turkish Republic is uniquely treated as inherently offensive, then Turkish players are plainly entitled to ask:
Why are Turkish historical symbols being held to a different standard?
If Turkish users are punished for displaying a mainstream Turkish national figure while equivalent expressions of other national identities are tolerated, that is the textbook appearance of selective treatment based on nationality.
10/ Discord itself defines national origin as a protected characteristic and prohibits discrimination and prejudice based on protected characteristics.
Paradox's own published forum rules likewise prohibit expressions that are racially offensive or “in any way discriminatory,” including ethnic slurs and hate speech.
So this cannot be dismissed with:
“Turks are offended, who cares?”
If Turkish nationality is being singled out for worse treatment, that is exactly the sort of discrimination these rules claim to oppose.
11/ The moderation process afterwards makes the situation even more concerning.
We challenged the accusations.
We attempted to provide historical and legal counterarguments.
Instead of those arguments simply being answered, users involved in the objection were banned and messages were removed or hidden.
Then access to the Discord was closed to new joins, meaning those already excluded could not simply return and defend themselves against what was being said about them.
If that closure was genuinely an unrelated anti-raid or security measure, say so and provide the timeline.
Otherwise, the sequence creates the very strong appearance of moderators controlling who was allowed to participate in the argument after banning the side challenging them.
12/ Then we moved the issue to Steam.
Why?
Because if moderators are confident that their decision was fair, they should have no problem with their reasoning being publicly examined.
Yet the complaint continued: messages challenging the moderation and defending the Turkish position were removed, restricted or suppressed instead of substantively answered.
If our argument is wrong, refute it.
Deleting an argument is not a refutation.
Banning the person asking the question is not evidence.
Closing the room after removing one side does not make the remaining side correct.
13/ And no, “this is a private server; we can ban whoever we want” does not answer the accusation of discriminatory moderation.
Yes, private communities have moderation powers.
Paradox's own rules reserve broad authority to delete posts and punish users.
But the existence of that power does not establish that every use of it is fair.
A moderator can possess the power to ban someone while still applying a rule selectively or discriminatorily.
Those are completely different questions.
14/ The issue therefore is not:
“Do moderators have a ban button?”
Of course they do.
The issue is:
Was a Turkish user banned under a standard that would have been applied in the same way to a comparable user from another nationality?
Was Atatürk targeted because of an objective, consistently applied rule?
Or was a central Turkish national figure treated as inherently illegitimate in a way equivalent foreign national figures are not?
That is the question Paradox needs to answer.
15/ Calling this concern “racism” or “anti-Turkish discrimination” is not about claiming that Turkish people constitute a biological race.
The relevant issue is discrimination and hostility based on national origin and ethnic/national identity — categories explicitly recognized in Discord's own hateful-conduct framework.
When Turkish identity, Turkish historical figures or Turkish users are singled out for adverse treatment because they are Turkish, that is a nationality-based discrimination concern regardless of the semantic label someone prefers.
16/ A Turkish person using Atatürk as an avatar does not imply hostility toward Armenians.
It does not imply support for atrocities.
It does not imply racial or ethnic supremacy.
For millions of Turkish citizens, Atatürk represents the creation of their modern republic.
Automatically interpreting that symbol through the most hostile possible lens while refusing equivalent respect to Turkish historical identity is precisely the kind of treatment that makes Turkish players feel unwelcome in an allegedly international community.
17/ Nor should Turkish users be required to renounce their own interpretation of a historical controversy simply to prove that they are worthy of participating in a gaming community.
There is an enormous difference between attacking Armenian people and disagreeing over legal or historical interpretation.
A fair moderation system should be capable of distinguishing:
a historical argument
from
hatred toward an ethnic group.
If it cannot, then Turkish users are being subjected to an ideological loyalty test rather than a neutral anti-hate policy.
18/ We therefore ask @HOI_Game @PdxInteractive @PDX_Dev_Studio and @chakerathe to answer directly:
What exact written rule made an ordinary Atatürk avatar bannable?
Was the user banned specifically because the picture was Atatürk?
What evidence supports the allegation personally connecting Atatürk to the crimes moderators attributed to him?
Are equivalent historical figures from other national communities subjected to the same standard?
Why were rebuttals removed or hidden?
Why were users challenging the decision banned?
Why was the Discord subsequently closed to new joins?
And who reviews a moderator accused of applying rules discriminatorily?
19/ This is especially important for a company running an international historical game.
Turkish players are not second-class members of the HOI4 community.
We are not guests who must hide the founder of our own republic while other players freely display their national history.
We buy the game.
We support the game.
We participate in the same communities.
We deserve exactly the same treatment as everyone else.
20/ @HOI_Game @PdxInteractive @PDX_Dev_Studio @chakerathe
This is why we are publicly raising the issue.
If the Atatürk ban was justified, show the rule and show the evidence.
If Atatürk was accused of personal responsibility for the Armenian events, substantiate that accusation.
If posts were removed for legitimate moderation reasons, explain which rules they violated.
If the Discord was closed for unrelated security reasons, document that.
But do not subject Turkish players to a different standard, remove their ability to respond, and then dismiss their complaint.
No anti-Turkish double standards.
No nationality-based discrimination.
No collective guilt.
Same rules. Same evidence. Same standards. Same respect
Şu meselenin o kadar çok boyutu var ki sadece kısa bir özet geçelim.
1. Çin ve Hindistan dönüşüm oranı düşük çöp ithalatını yasakladı
2. Bu Avrupa için bir yıkımdı. Onca işe yaramaz çöpü nereye göndereceklerdi
3. O da ne bir anda Türkiye’de bu çöpleri alana teşvik kararı çıktı.
4. Türkiye’ye gelen çöp miktarı yıllar içinde bir anda yüzlerce kat arttı
5. Bu çöpler o kadar değersizdi ki alan iktidar yanlısı geri dönüşümcüler bunları özellikle Adana bölgesinde dağa taşa dökmeye başladı
6.Bazıları nakliye parasından kurtulmak için biriktirip biriktirip yaktı (bakınız @geridonusyangin hesabı. Bu yangınlar hep gece çıkar, kimse yaralanmaz ve ne tesadüf ki sadece depolama alanı yanar)
7. BBC bile Adana dağlarında sadece İngiltere’de satılan bazı ürünlerin atıklarından belgesel yaptı
8. 2-3 yıl önce bu iş iyice ayyuka çıkınca kısmen yasaklandı
9. Ancak yasa lobi faaliyetleriyle geri çekildi
Sonuç Afrika’nın Çin’in Hindistan’ın bile kabul etmediği artıklar Türkiye’ye geliyor. İngiltere çöpünün misal %70’i Türkiye’de
Dağlar çöp doldu, tesisler yanmaya doymadı ama durun denizler var dök gitsin aşamasına geldi.
Büyük ülkeymiş İHA’ymış Siha’ymış Trump’ın arkasına dizilen 150 beygirmiş
Büyük ülke dediğiniz çöp ülke.
Yargısı çöp basını çöp demokrasisi çöp olanı mecazi bırakmazlar denizi toprağı da çöp olur.
Hem de kamu teşviğiyle. Hani emekliye yok işçiye yok öğrenciye yok ama Avrupa’nın çöpünü toplayan vahşi sermayedarlara var!
Ceuta hakkında birkaç husus:
Ceuta Avrupa değildir. Kuzey Afrika'da, tarihsel olarak Fas toprakları içinde yer alan ve İspanyol sömürge yönetiminden geriye kalan bir İspanyol yerleşim bölgesidir (enklav).
- İspanya Başbakanı Pedro Sanchez, Fas Kralı'nın hoşuna gitmeyen bir hamleyle, bölgedeki rakibi Cezayir'i dört yıl aradan sonra daha birkaç gün önce ziyaret etti.
- İspanya'nın şu anda Fas Kralı'nın en yakın siyasi ortaklarından ikisiyle (İsrail ve ABD) ilişkileri son derece kötüdür.
- İsrail ve ABD'nin İspanya'nın sorun yaşamasında çıkarı olduğu açıktır. Gençler Fas'ta neredeyse hiç gelecek görmüyor ve ne pahasına olursa olsun oradan ayrılmak istiyor. Sağ için bir "işgal" retoriğine dolgu malzemesi olarak kullanılıyorlar.
Ceuta Schengen Bölgesi'ne dahil değildir. Oradan İspanya ana karasına geçmek için vize veya olumlu sonuçlanmış bir sığınma süreci gereklidir. İspanya ve Fas, tüm şahısları geri göndereceklerini zaten açıkladılar. Dolayısıyla yaşanan olayların somut bir sonucu yoktur.
Yegane amaç, dünya genelinde Sanchez'e, İspanya'ya, göçmenlere ve Müslümanlara karşı kışkırtıcı bir havanın yaratılmasıdır. Bu İsrail'in klasik rıza üretim stratejisi olagelmiştir.
AKP, Paris davasını kaybetti!
Gizlenen dava sonucuna ulaştık.
Uluslararası Tahkim Mahkemesi’nin;
AKP’nin, Irak-Türkiye ham petrol boru hattında yaptığı usulsüzlükler nedeniyle;
Türkiye aleyhine hükmettiği 1 Milyar 471 Milyon Dolarlık ceza kararını iptal etmek için başvurduğu Paris İstinaf Mahkemesi’ndeki davanın kaybedildiğini belgeledik.
Artık 1 Milyar 471 Milyon Dolarlık tahkim cezasının ödenmesi için geri sayım başladı!
Peki süreç nasıl gelişti?
13 Şubat 2023’de Uluslararası Tahkim Mahkemesi aldığı kararla;
AKP’nin, 21 Mayıs 2014 – 30 Eylül 2018 tarihleri arasında, Irak-Türkiye ham petrol boru hattında;
Irak Merkezi Hükümetinin izni olmaksızın⬇️
1.) Irak’a ait petrolü usulsüz olarak taşıdığı,
2.) Ceyhan Limanı’nda yüklemesini yaptığı,
3.) Irak devletinin satış fiyatının altında bu petrolün satılmasına neden olduğu gerekçesiyle,
Türkiye’nin Irak’a net 1 Milyar 471 Milyon Dolar tazminat ödemesine hükmetmişti.
277 sayfalık Nihai Tahkim Kararını ilk kez kamuoyuna belgeleriyle biz açıklamıştık.
AKP ise verdiği yanıtta;
Bu cezayı içeren tahkim kararının iptali için Paris’te dava açtıklarını açıklamıştı.
Yaptığımız araştırma neticesinde;
AKP’nin, uluslararası tahkim kararına karşı Paris İstinaf Mahkemesinde açtığı ‘Kararın İptali Davasını’ kaybettiğini tespit ettik.
Sonuç⬇️
1 Milyar 471 Milyon Dolar tutarındaki ceza ödemesi için geri sayım başladı!
Bu devasa ceza tutarı, mutlaka Tayyip Erdoğan’ın ve ilgili AKP’li yöneticilerin mal varlıklarından tahsil edilmelidir!
İşte resmi belgeler⬇️
Kaynak: 10 Mart 2026 tarihli Paris İstinaf Mahkemesi Kararı (Fransızca Orijinali, Türkçe Çevirisi)
SITUATION DETECTED: For the first time in internet history, agentic traffic has surpassed human traffic online, per Cloudflare Radar.
"Vize İmparatorluğu" yazı dizisi hakkındaki haberler ve paylaşımlar erişime engellenmeye devam ediyor.
Yazı dizisinin ardından, erişim engellerini konu alan haberler ve sosyal medya paylaşımları da üçüncü kez millî güvenlik ve kamu düzeni gerekçesiyle erişime engellendi.
Alınan kararlar:
• 1 Haziran 2026: İstanbul 9. Sulh Ceza Hakimliğinin 2026/5576 sayılı kararı
• 2 Haziran 2026: İstanbul 5. Sulh Ceza Hakimliğinin 2026/4503 sayılı kararı
• 3 Haziran 2026: İstanbul 7. Sulh Ceza Hakimliğinin 2026/4994 sayılı kararı
https://t.co/z3JOCNAN8a
Vize devi VFS ve iş ortağı Gateway’in faaliyetlerini ele aldığımız “Vize imparatorluğu” yazı dizisine ilişkin ne kadar tweet’im varsa bugün hepsine erişim engeli getirildi. Hatta erişim engeli getirildiğine ilişkin tweet’e de erişimi engellediler. Belki bunu da engellerler.
Şunu iyi bilelim her hangi bir asliye hukuk mahkemesi bir siyasi partiye genel başkan tayin edemez. Kendisini seçim kurulları yerine koyarak karar alamaz. Bu çok ağır bir yetki gaspı ve anayasa ihlali olur. Kısaca butlan kararı yoklukla malüldür. Hiç doğamaz. Biz yoklukla malül bu kararı tanımayız seçim yargısının verdiği mazbatalar iptal edilemez. Biz de o mazbata kimdeyse onun yanında dururuz!
@terrariste incredible ragebait
Journalists know that losing the Wayback Machine would be a nightmare: https://t.co/1WwaRQ57Ji
https://t.co/7QBTS9ermc
Merhaba uluslararası hukuk avukatıyım. Aylık kazancım $ 10,000. Genç avukatlara tavsiyem necronomiconu okuyup karanlık sanatlara yönelmeleri. Sonrasında iş işi getiriyor gerçekten 🙏🏼
Avukat takipçimizin mesajı;
“Cross” into Lebanon is a funny way to say “invade a sovereign nation”
🚨 Report: ‘Double-tap’ strike killed 165 Iranian schoolgirls in Minab
An investigation by Middle East Eye finds the deadly strike on the Shajareh Tayyebeh girls’ school in Minab, southern Iran, involved two explosions, with the second blast hitting survivors who had taken shelter after the first attack.
▪️ Witnesses and Red Crescent medics said students were moved to the school’s prayer hall after the initial strike. A second missile then hit the same area.
▪️ 165-181 people were killed, almost all girls aged 7–12. Many parents had been called to collect their children when the second strike occurred.
▪️ Officials say the destruction was so severe that dozens of victims remain unidentified, with DNA testing underway.
U.S. and Israeli officials say they are “investigating” the incident. White House Press Secretary @PressSec responds in the clip below from today. 👇
Why is jet fuel the most stressed barrel right now?
1⃣Jet fuel has very specialized tank storage requirements. Therefore there is not much stored, unlike many other products like diesel and gasoline.
2⃣You can only produce mainstream jet fuel from the refinery aside from a mere ~1% sustainable aviation fuel globally
3⃣Asian refineries are reducing runs as their crude is stuck at the Straits of Hormuz. AG refineries have also been hit by the attacks.
4⃣With oil production also shutting in, longer run cuts are expected.
4⃣Lack of storage + Lower supply from refining runs = Recipe for disaster
Travel is going to get a whole lot more expensive.
#oott
Last Seen Users on Sotwe
Trends for you
Most Popular Users
Elon Musk 
@elonmusk
241.7M followers
Barack Obama
@barackobama
119M followers
Cristiano Ronaldo
@cristiano
114.5M followers
Donald J. Trump
@realdonaldtrump
111.9M followers
Narendra Modi
@narendramodi
107.2M followers
Rihanna
@rihanna
98.7M followers
NASA
@nasa
92.4M followers
Justin Bieber
@justinbieber
91.8M followers
KATY PERRY
@katyperry
90M followers
Taylor Swift
@taylorswift13
84M followers
Lady Gaga
@ladygaga
75.5M followers
Virat Kohli
@imvkohli
73.5M followers
Kim Kardashian
@kimkardashian
70.9M followers
YouTube
@youtube
68.8M followers
Neymar Jr
@neymarjr
66.5M followers
Bill Gates
@billgates
65.2M followers
Selena Gomez
@selenagomez
63.1M followers
The Ellen Show
@theellenshow
62.3M followers
CNN
@cnn
61.8M followers
X
@x
60.7M followers