To understand a system, ignore what it says it rewards and watch instead what it actually promotes.
"The purpose of a system is what it does" - @incentivising
Reputation is the currency your name gets priced in: it takes ages to build, and minutes to ruin.
"For as Cicero says, even those who argue against fame still want the books they write against it to bear their name in the title and hope to become famous for despising it"
Companies often ask for total loyalty, but offer little security. You're told to buy into a "mission" while they can cut your job or benefits to hit quarterly numbers.
But this is not a bug, it's a feature, so treat it that way.
The future is specialists who work with companies on clear, transactional terms.
The concept of the civilian is a historical anomaly that is rapidly closing.
For a brief window, states were powerful enough to wage war using specialized subsets of the population while the rest operated factories and consumed media. Now, the theater of conflict is entirely ambient: information operations, supply chain disruption, and psychological attrition do not recognize the boundary of your front lawn.
If you are still orienting your life around the assumption of perpetual peacetime, you are a passive resource waiting to be harvested. The people who understand this have already reorganized their networks into operational cells.
Friends who act like alliances, careers optimized for their own operational objectives. The social contract was torn up.
The moment your best people see mediocrity go unaddressed, the incentive structure updates in real time, and effort becomes optional for everyone watching.
And then, you have a whole cultural problem to fix, when a single 1-on-1 would have prevented it.
You don't need discipline when you have no alternatives:
- When I'm studying, I'm in an empty room and can do nothing but study.
- When I'm writing, I only have Obsidian in full screen, with airplane mode on.
- When I'm working, only the work phone is on.
Discipline takes too much energy. It's way easier to just make whatever you have to do the easiest choice.
@PaperBozz I've seen it first-hand. When it happens, it's just a question of time before everyone thinks: "Why should I put more effort, when he/she doesn't and nobody seems to care?"
The moment your best people see mediocrity go unaddressed, the incentive structure updates in real time, and effort becomes optional for everyone watching.
And then, you have a whole cultural problem to fix, when a single 1-on-1 would have prevented it.
Quartz Sea turned four months old this week!
We're building fast. New features, real improvements.
And we want to build the right things.
That means hearing from you.
Please take a moment to fill this survey: it takes less than 2 minutes.
(link in first reply)
@alexeixbt One of the best predictor of success, indeed, is the ZIP code. Not the race, not the family connections.
We are really shaped by what we compare ourselves to.
@NumanThabit This is interesting, but from my understanding the issue is more the inherent vulnerability of Tor than Monero, or am I missing something?
You don't need discipline when you have no alternatives:
- When I'm studying, I'm in an empty room and can do nothing but study.
- When I'm writing, I only have Obsidian in full screen, with airplane mode on.
- When I'm working, only the work phone is on.
Discipline takes too much energy. It's way easier to just make whatever you have to do the easiest choice.
game theory fix for lack of willpower:
eliminate choice entirely.
hernán cortés burned his ships so his troops couldn't retreat.
you don't need more discipline. you need a commitment device, a constraint that makes backing out mathematically impossible.
You don't need discipline when you have no alternatives:
- When I'm studying, I'm in an empty room and can do nothing but study.
- When I'm writing, I only have Obsidian in full screen, with airplane mode on.
- When I'm working, only the work phone is on.
Discipline takes too much energy. It's way easier to just make whatever you have to do the easiest choice.
Reputation is the currency your name gets priced in: it takes ages to build, and minutes to ruin.
"For as Cicero says, even those who argue against fame still want the books they write against it to bear their name in the title and hope to become famous for despising it"
Your reputation operates like a line of credit. Years of reliability allow people to trust you before every fact is available, forgive an isolated error, and place larger responsibilities in your hands. Repeated small defaults raise the interest rate until even your honest words require verification.
@theralkia How can they not? Social media is built around a cult of personality, and it takes quite an effort for anyone posting consistently not to get high on their own supply