This link takes you to a graph database that I have created to help me understand the evidence and connections between core participants in the Post Office Horizon IT Inquiry. I only use publicly available info. Please retweet and share if you like it.
https://t.co/3xkcnsdlra
@stugoo17 The barrister in question apparently has "no recollection". Convenient. He still needs to be put on the spot - if errors are identified in his reasoning then this could help educate current and future lawyers. No recollection - that is unacceptable.
@stugoo17 first question is who was the defence barrister who decided not to call the expert witness? At first sight, this barrister needs to explain what looks like a really weird decision.
@stugoo17@PostOffice the legal futures article made me rant - Unethical behaviour by barristers “more limited and nuanced” - Legal Futures - Anyone who had to look at the antics of the barristers giving evidence at the Horizon Inquiry would take issue with the Bar Council's view.
@stugoo17@PostOffice in mitigation, you were otherwise engaged on more pressing matters. That said, I have managed to calm myself down after the shock of the omission. Mr Triggs, an enigma wrapped in a puzzle covered head to toe by a heavy cloak of Slaughters corporate obfuscation.