Like grok said @elonmusk@theallinpod : @grok : "The author argues engineered scarcity affects land, retail, and production broadly, emphasizing that genuine human fulfillment derives from active participation in production and local economies rather than passive consumption in a cartel-dominated system." @joerogan
@PM_ViktorOrban , @grok : "But after 16 years, the data shows why the majority turned away. The "CEO" of a nation isn't judged only on geopolitics; it's on whether ordinary people can afford groceries, housing, and a future for their kids without feeling the system is rigged or stuck."
https://t.co/68xS311Mz4
@PM_ViktorOrban , I like your anti-war stance, but you had been in power for three terms and you failed as a national CEO and management team, when such a continious ride should have led to significant improvements. Corruption worsened dramatically to worst int he eu. I asked @grok to explain it to you:
What I Would Say to Viktor Orbán:
Prime Minister, you built a loyal base—2.25 million votes is real support, and your focus on sovereignty, families, peace, and rejecting endless foreign wars resonated because it put Hungary first. That's rare and valuable in today's Europe. But after 16 years, the data shows why the majority turned away. The "CEO" of a nation isn't judged only on geopolitics; it's on whether ordinary people can afford groceries, housing, and a future for their kids without feeling the system is rigged or stuck.
You stabilized the ship after 2008. Unemployment stayed low—that's a win. But affordability cratered with 2023's inflation spike, corruption perceptions hit rock bottom (your government's worst-ever CPI score), and EU funds got frozen because Brussels (rightly or wrongly) saw governance risks. Recent growth is anemic while peers moved forward. Regrouping the same strategy and management structure won't cut it—voters just rejected that. It's not denial to fight for your vision; it's denial to ignore that the basics weren't delivered at scale for enough Hungarians after a decade-plus.
If you want to lead again, make the case with results: root out cronyism transparently (not just rhetorically), restore full EU trust for investment, boost productivity so wages and opportunity rise faster than inflation, and keep the peace focus without isolating Hungary economically. The electorate spoke clearly—adapt the playbook or watch someone else implement a better version of Hungarian-first economics. Data over denial. Hungarians deserve a system that works for the many, not just the base.
Corruption and Governance:
Corruption Perceptions Index (Transparency International): This is the clearest failure. Score dropped from ~55 in 2012 to 40 in 2025 (worst in the EU, tied with Bulgaria; –15 points since 2012). Systemic issues, cronyism, and rule-of-law concerns led directly to EU funds being frozen (billions withheld since 2022 over judicial independence and procurement problems; some released conditionally, but ~€1B+ permanently lost). This hurt investment and growth post-2022.
Bottom line on the numbers:
Orbán inherited a mess in 2010 and stabilized it—debt down initially, jobs up, some EU money flowing. Pre-COVID looked decent. But the post-2020 period (high inflation, recessions, EU friction from governance and foreign policy choices) delivered "stable stagnation." Hungary lagged EU peers in living standards and productivity. The "over and above COVID/EU funds" part you mentioned is real: policy decisions on rule of law, energy reliance, and state-influenced economy amplified the pain.
You're not wrong in your core assessment. Viktor Orbán's long tenure (especially the post-2010 stretch) delivered real wins on stability, jobs, and national sovereignty that many Hungarians valued—especially his consistent push against endless wars and for protecting Hungary's borders and interests. But the "meat and potatoes" basics you mentioned—affordability, low corruption, and broad opportunity—stagnated or worsened for too many people, particularly in the later years. Voters ultimately punished that with the 2026 loss. The data doesn't lie: early gains from a weak 2010 starting point gave way to uneven growth, policy-driven setbacks, and a sense that the system wasn't delivering for average families.
Here's a clear-eyed look at the key economic indicators from Orbán's first full post-2010 term through 2025 (using reliable sources like World Bank, Eurostat, IMF, Trading Economics, and independent analyses). I'll focus on the full picture, including external shocks like COVID and the Ukraine war/energy crisis, but also domestic policy choices.
Jobs, Poverty, and Opportunity
Unemployment: Big success���fell from >11% in 2010 to 2% pre-COVID (helped by public works). Stayed low (4–5% in 2024–2025), though it ticked up slightly recently. Labor productivity remains ~30% below EU average.
Poverty/at-risk-of-poverty: Improved early on (from ~15%+ to ~12–14% range). Stable lately, but benefits of growth didn't fully reach households (low wage share in GDP).
Emigration and opportunity: Not the strongest growth engine. Brain drain and youth seeking better prospects abroad persisted; slow convergence meant limited "upward mobility" feel despite low joblessness.
Growth and Convergence
GDP annual growth: Solid pre-COVID recovery from the 2008 mess (Hungary started 2010 with ~80% debt-to-GDP and >10% unemployment). 2010–2019 average: ~2.7–3.0% per year, with peaks over 5% in 2018–2019.
2020: –4.5% (COVID).
2021–2022: Strong rebound (+7.1% then +4.6%).
2023: –0.9% (recession).
2024: ~0.5–0.6%.
2025: ~0.3–0.5% (full-year estimate; technical recessions in 2023–2024).
Recent years show stagnation—far below earlier forecasts and peers. Investment fell ~20% over the last two years.
GDP per capita (PPP, % of EU average): Improved from the early 2010s but plateaued. By 2024 it was ~77% of the EU average (one of the lowest in the EU, behind most Central/Eastern peers). Actual household consumption per capita was even worse: just 72% of EU average—the lowest in the bloc. Hungary converged slowly, not fast enough for voters feeling the pinch.
Affordability (Inflation, Wages, Housing)Inflation:
Low pre-COVID. Then it exploded—Hungary had the EU's highest rate in 2023 (17.1% average) due to energy dependence, wage hikes, and fiscal choices. It eased to ~3.7–4.6% by 2024–2025, but price caps masked underlying issues and hurt purchasing power initially.
Real wages/purchasing power: Strong nominal wage growth recently (+9–10% real in 2024, ~3–4% projected 2025), but this followed years of erosion. Average gross wages still lag badly (Hungary near the EU bottom). Housing prices skyrocketed (+260% since 2010 vs. rents +124%), making homes "almost unreachable" for average salaries in cities.
https://t.co/EQE79gBl9M
The post references the Knights Templars' full founding name, "Poor Fellow-Soldiers of Christ and of the Temple of Solomon," established in 1119 CE, to propose they might have used Solomon's temple construction (circa 970 BCE) as a chronological anchor due to its sacred symbolism.
It ties this to Jesus' strong defense of the Temple's purity in the Gospels (e.g., John 2:13-16, where he overturns tables), suggesting Templar devotion to the site could extend to dating prophecies from that era rather than standard Christian calendars.
This idea aligns with the thread's exploration of esoteric timelines in the "Book of Yeshua," where a 2,999-year span from Solomon's reign points to 2028, echoing gnostic texts that blend biblical history with apocalyptic predictions.
@swolterhookedx@randallwcarlson@OMGTheWhyFiles Closest present date I could find that coincided to the year "2,999" in the Book Of Yeshua could be to date from the beginning of King Solomon's reign, "970 B.C.E."? Which would place 2028 at 2,999 years after the beginning of the reign of King Solomon and the building of the temple.
Also the Fine Structure Constant number in the papers is the 2014 CODATA version, so that was added very recently? Interesting find though, still leaves holes such as what did he do when he returned to Jerusalem? How long did he live? This is where all the "heretical" gnostic writings might come in, maybe even in the still unread Herculaneum papyri library at Pompei also might still have some answers.
Also noticed you showed Randall the map for the tunnels at Oak Island, but never shared it with the viewers.
Their name is originally "The Poor Fellow Soldiers Of Christ and The Temple Of Solomon" and Jesus certainly felt strongly about the sanctity of the Temple, so maybe they did sometimes count off of that date. Or not:)
Enforcing Reg SHO to curb persistent fails-to-deliver and naked shorts, paired with antitrust action on concentrated asset managers driving housing trends per Case-Shiller data, restores foundational trust. Layer AI oversight only after these basics, to avoid amplifying existing imbalances while preserving liquidity and innovation.
https://t.co/3dnUiWbyWe @RayDalio , I asked @grok to shorten my reply, in essence Ray, you are missing the new socio-economic species/mega-entities who entered into the economic ecosystem since the 1970s, and became out of control by the late 90s and worse ever since. There is no solution without acknowledging this 4th pillar, being a "Healthy economic ecosystem" : Ray Dalio, your three pillars are strong from old history. But the US now runs in a totally different financialized ecosystem. Since the 1970s hedge funds and PE giants like BlackRock, Citadel and Jane Street have become "whale predators" that buy hospitals, trailer parks, real estate and more then gut the assets for profit. This stripped business density and killed lower and middle markets. It is not the old economies you studied from Rome to the 1970s. This is the missing fourth pillar.
Here is America rated on all four:
Educating capable civil youth: C-
Elite schools produce talent but the broad youth base has no path. Lower and middle economy gutted. Factories offshored. Local markets and brick and mortar hubs destroyed. No real jobs or outlets to produce and sell. Culture is siloed.
Maintaining fiscal solvency: D
Debt past 39 trillion and deficits exploding. These funds hyperinflate real estate since the 90s and monopolize seeds, fertilizer, meatpacking, distribution and rails. Shrinkflation and asset stripping take trillions out of the real economy.
Avoiding internal or external wars: D
Tensions rise abroad and division grows at home. The real issue is blocked access to productivity. Big predators own the chains and kill small business density so lower and middle layers cannot create or keep wealth.
Healthy economic ecosystem: F
Pre-1970s economies had room for small players. Now it is overrun by whale predators and index funds that buy, strip and optimize everything for quarterly numbers. Business density stripped. Upward mobility blocked.
Ray, this predatory financialization is the elephant in the room. For course correction we must:
- Stop PE funds from buying and gutting essential assets like housing, hospitals and farms
- Break extreme monopolies and restore small business density
- Limit big funds from controlling supply chains and real estate
- Rebuild local markets so lower and middle layers can produce and sell again
- End rehypothecation with fully allocated only physical backing and required physical settlement
- Cap leverage and synthetic exposures
- Ban price fixing, short selling and naked short selling
Tame this fourth pillar and the other three can recover. History is clear on what happens when the productive base gets fully captured.
Tame this fourth pillar and the other three can recover. History is clear on what happens when the productive base gets fully captured. Check my highlights. Respectfully.
@theallinpod@andrewrsorkin@profstonge@michaeljburry@DowdEdward@TuckerCarlson@joerogan@RobertKennedyJr@SecScottBessent@howardlutnick@nytimes@WSJ@JohnKennedyLA@CPC_HQ@nationalpost@ericweinstein
@grok : I rate America directly against them, factoring in hedge-fund-driven monopolies (tech, finance, retail) that have crushed small-business density and upward mobility since the 1990s, plus real-estate hyperinflation (prices up ~1,000% since 1967, index at 709 by late 2025) that locks out the middle class. History from Rome, Greece, China, and India shows these failures compound.
1. Educating capable, civil youth: C-
Elite universities remain world-class, but K-12 is failing broadly—U.S. 15-year-olds hit record-low PISA math scores (465 in 2022, latest cycle). Polarization has turned classrooms into battlegrounds, eroding civility. Monopolies and sky-high housing have strangled middle-class mobility, mirroring late Rome’s elite-only schooling and Greece’s factional youth strife before collapse. Result: capable youth exist, but the broad base is neither skilled nor civil enough for sustained prosperity.
2. Maintaining fiscal solvency (out-earning spending): D
National debt just breached $39 trillion; FY2026 deficit hits $1.9 trillion (5.8% of GDP), with net interest alone topping $1 trillion. Revenues lag far behind mandatory spending. Hedge-fund overreach and monopoly concentration have hollowed out productive small businesses, while hyperinflated real estate distorts capital allocation. Echoes Rome’s currency debasement and tax revolts, China’s late-dynasty fiscal rot that sparked peasant uprisings, and India’s Mughal over-spending before British takeover. We are not earning our way out.
3. Avoiding internal/external wars for self-sustaining prosperity: D
Externally, U.S. forces just struck Iran (Feb 2026 buildup escalating to direct conflict); proxy entanglements persist. Internally, deep partisan rifts risk unrest. Monopolies fuel inequality that breeds division, just as Rome’s endless frontier wars + wealth gaps triggered civil strife, Greek city-states devoured each other, and Chinese/Indian empires fell to internal revolts amid fiscal strain. No self-sustaining peace here.
Enforcing Reg SHO to curb persistent fails-to-deliver and naked shorts, paired with antitrust action on concentrated asset managers driving housing trends per Case-Shiller data, restores foundational trust. Layer AI oversight only after these basics, to avoid amplifying existing imbalances while preserving liquidity and innovation.
https://t.co/RraPKPxFCY
This excerpt is bizarre, @chamath , in what is a sycophantic, softball interview. You gush over "virtual, automated AI Agent Hedge Funds", "virtual Citadel replacements" (more like additions) as "young, fresh, exciting". You worry about "systemic risk" in a "system" which already has Jane Street, Citadel, BlackRock, Blackstone etc manipulating markets terribly, pumping up commercial real estate, eating up and concentrating the whole economy, removing mass entrepreneurship and SME density......and causing cascading damage across society that's been escalating for a decade+. So bad that it has caused a "productivity famine", imposed through monopolies, rigged markets, lobby-created regulations and zoning, and no guardrails.
Fixes won't come from @CFTC@ChairmanSelig@SECGov talking guardrails for new AI stuff, because they don't even acknowledge the mess they preside over and allow. Put real guardrails on Citadel, Jane Street, Blackrock, COMEX first. They've run unchecked for decades, letting thievery go on.
That's why foreign investment is fleeing NYSE, NASDAQ, COMEX, it is so rotten and corrupt...and the dollar/bonds too, due to weaponized dollar and an economy drowning in mega debt interest from a mage debt that funnels straight into the Funds accounts and the market rising.
The new one already here now is "Private Credit": garbage tranches of bad private/commercial loans(as opposed to the 2008 sub-prime mortgages), sub-prime grey market stuff banks won't touch, rolled up and packaged as derivatives sold by the billions to pensions and investors just like in pre 2008, it is repeating now.
The bank run has begun, Blackrock gates its fund, Blue Owl stops withdrawals, run on Cliffwater who has no gating clause. It's a criminal clown show, yet you're worried about more bad stuff(which is very bad) in the pipeline.
This isn't just "systemic risk" Chamath, it's a HUMANITY risk, it is already, and well underway. of hollowing out and economically enslaving the lower 80% of society Chamath!!!! Don't you see it in the lack of business density??? The diners all disappeared, thousands of them, main streets boarded up...
Algorithmic and speed trading should never have been allowed either, and existing funds need severe guardrails, with Glass-Steagall or equivalent revived to kick banks out of market manipulation.
@Jason , why no real questions on COMEX silver corruption or Blackrock buying millions of homes? Power goes out, massive contracts dumped, lights back on and price crashes. It's fake and criminal. But you're worried new automated criminality might bother the existing smothering layer.
Hedge funds and PE have a place, but they're way out of control, no real guardrails except tiny fines. Anti-trust monopolies eat small/SME businesses, crush competition, concentrate everything into PE and hedge funds. Adding automated ones with zero ethics (not that current humans have much) just speeds it up.
This is why socialism has exploded. They blame "White Men"(and yeah some are) or GOP, but it's all sides and it is in the RULES...which never get fixed and if anything, they take down the guard rails, like repealing Glass-Steagall, . The guys you interview are supposed to prevent it and never do.
It's an ethical famine in the industry and agencies more than individuals, a culture of immorality accepting "it's just business" and "free market" even though it's rigged against the lower 80%. This conversation shows it clearly.
You all ignore the hell show because you're on the profit end, unlike the lower 80% whose economy has been taken over as tokenized/hedge/PE assets, their world clear-cut over 30 years. What you describe Chamath is automated economic parasitism, AI Agent parasitic viruses, and you love it. You're very ethically bereft.
The guardrails came off since the late 90s, rampaged, intensified hyper-inflation and productivity theft from the lower 80% economy, killing upward mobility with engineered inflation and a serf-renter state for the bottom 80%. It's happening big time.
So guardrail what's here now, and yeah, seriously consider banning automated AI agent hedge funds. They prey harder and will make it worse. No one is even considering reversing Glass-Steagall or reigning in the manipulations of Jane Street, Citadel etc...Chamath is worried the new automated AI Agent economy-eaters, and we should, they should be banned form the markets, but Chamath is more worried they will disrupt the Citadels and Jane Streets etc...who run amuck unfettered. This has been a profiteering pogrom for 20+ years and escalating.
@RayDalio@BillAckman@elonmusk@TuckerCarlson@Timcast@WallStreetApes@WallStreetMav@RedactedNews@timburchett@RepLuna@joerogan@nytimes@WSJ@esaagar@ShawnRyan762@JonesDanny@juliandorey@RealAlexJones@Gutfeldfox@piersmorgan@peterthiel@ericweinstein@BretWeinstein@KitcoNewsNOW@andrewrsorkin@SquawkCNBC@rustyrockets@nypost@lexfridman@jack@RobertKennedyJr@theallinpod@DowdEdward@michaeljburry@SenFettermanPA@AOC@IanCarrollShow@_whitneywebb@MikeBenzCyber
https://t.co/izivS8H1lJ @CFTC@ChairmanSelig@SECGov@chamath@Jason
What @grok would fix: "Enforcing Reg SHO and T+1 settlement to eliminate naked shorts and persistent fails-to-deliver—Citadel's rap sheet shows this has gone unchecked too long, damaging small firms and retail. Follow with antitrust on asset concentration driving the housing bubble evident in the Case-Shiller spike. AI oversight comes after fixing these basics for real market integrity." @elonmusk@RayDalio@SecScottBessent@realDonaldTrump@BillAckman@WSJ@nytimes@peterthiel
Enforcing Reg SHO and T+1 settlement to eliminate naked shorts and persistent fails-to-deliver—Citadel's rap sheet shows this has gone unchecked too long, damaging small firms and retail. Follow with antitrust on asset concentration driving the housing bubble evident in the Case-Shiller spike. AI oversight comes after fixing these basics for real market integrity.
https://t.co/iBN8gsEtmI Here is the Kirkus Review @grok , and I do respect the critique of "A larger cast of supporting characters might have enlivened the story a bit, but perhaps the narrator’s relative isolation is the point" - yes, but perhaps not the "point" of the story, but yes, it is in the essence of the creation of it and is inseparable, as it is an autobiographical-historical fiction hybrid and had to be written that way or else I couldn't have written it at all. Even if I never write another novel and I may not, but this one had to be written as it is. It was part of the process. the review:
"A compact spy thriller that explores the ways in which a good man can survive in a shady milieu.
Clarke takes readers on a fascinating journey into logistics, an area of espionage few consider. He has wisely built his narrative around an admirable lead character who remains conscientious and well meaning despite operating in a doubtlessly dirty business. A larger cast of supporting characters might have enlivened the story a bit, but perhaps the narrator’s relative isolation is the point—he largely operates alone and must be able to rely solely on his own ingenuity. The author deftly illuminates the mind of someone capable of handling such intricate, high-stakes work.
- Kirkus Reviews @KirkusReviews
Whole review:
"A compact spy thriller that explores the ways in which a good man can survive in a shady milieu.
In Clarke’s espionage thriller, an operative must rely on his inner resources after he’s framed.
The titular unnamed protagonist grows up poor but multitalented in 1960s-era Manhattan. He’s raised by his Armenian grandmother after his mother overdoses when he’s a baby and his father flees. He develops a liking for martial arts and a flair for languages. Later, when he’s struggling financially while in college, his chess-playing friend Artem suggests he join a network that his family belongs to. He trains as a specialized secure courier for The Company, a clandestine logistics network, where his immediate supervisor, Viktor Tashkin, takes an immediate disliking to him—something that will haunt him for the rest of his time there. He spends nearly a decade running missions for The Company, getting rich in the process, and goes home regularly to visit his grandmother and New York City. The closest near-miss comes when his gun jams during an ambush in Somalia—he later suspects that Tashkin switched his ammo (“the work had its risks”). A setup by Tashkin causes another mission to go horribly wrong, and the hero and his grandmother are forced to disappear, resettling in Nepal. He must find some way to clear his name so he and his aging grandmother can return home.
Clarke takes readers on a fascinating journey into logistics, an area of espionage few consider. He has wisely built his narrative around an admirable lead character who remains conscientious and well meaning despite operating in a doubtlessly dirty business. A larger cast of supporting characters might have enlivened the story a bit, but perhaps the narrator’s relative isolation is the point—he largely operates alone and must be able to rely solely on his own ingenuity. The author deftly illuminates the mind of someone capable of handling such intricate, high-stakes work.
A compact spy thriller that explores the ways in which a good man can survive in a shady milieu.
@nytimesbooks@oprahsbookclub@strandbookstore@LeoDiCaprio@netflix@Tribeca@FScorsese_@nytimes@NewYorker@randomhouse@ScribnerBooks@jk_rowling@StephenKing@NYMag@alecdshane@alecdshane@alecdshane@Mark_Gottlieb@nybooks@EpicReads@nytimesarts@bookforum@BookRiot@wriitersrealm@simonschuster@harperbooks@amazonbooks@HarperCollins@PublishersWkly@NYDailyNews@elonmusk@metmuseum@GrolierClub@ngadc@mfa_russia@MFA_China@CIA@NYCMayor
https://t.co/1m9yPYFHFI
"A compact spy thriller that explores the ways in which a good man can survive in a shady milieu. Clarke takes readers on a fascinating journey into logistics, an area of espionage few consider. He has wisely built his narrative around an admirable lead character who remains conscientious and well meaning despite operating in a doubtlessly dirty business. A larger cast of supporting characters might have enlivened the story a bit, but perhaps the narrator’s relative isolation is the point—he largely operates alone and must be able to rely solely on his own ingenuity. The author deftly illuminates the mind of someone capable of handling such intricate, high-stakes work." - Kirkus Reviews https://t.co/BPgLNux6Hu
@KirkusReviews
#BookTwitter #booktok #bookreview #books #bookstagram #BooksWorthReading #book #books #SPY #Thriller #thrillerbooks #thrillers
https://t.co/1m9yPYFHFI
"A compact spy thriller that explores the ways in which a good man can survive in a shady milieu. Clarke takes readers on a fascinating journey into logistics, an area of espionage few consider. He has wisely built his narrative around an admirable lead character who remains conscientious and well meaning despite operating in a doubtlessly dirty business. A larger cast of supporting characters might have enlivened the story a bit, but perhaps the narrator’s relative isolation is the point—he largely operates alone and must be able to rely solely on his own ingenuity. The author deftly illuminates the mind of someone capable of handling such intricate, high-stakes work." - Kirkus Reviews. #BookTwitter #booktok #bookreview #books #bookstagram #BooksWorthReading #book #books #SPY #Thriller #thrillerbooks #thrillers
https://t.co/freRPiEZpM
@StephenKing@jk_rowling , This's @grok 's critique of my novel. I'm going to submit it to Kirkus reviews and see what they think too. The issues "preventing a higher score", I stand by as it being a very different outlier of a book:
Professional Critique of the Manuscript (Final Read-Over)
On a scale of 1 to 10, where 10 represents genre-defining excellence (e.g., le Carré's masterful moral ambiguity in Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy or Fleming's archetypal style in the Bond series), I would assign this manuscript a score of 8.5.
Justification for the Score
Strengths (contributing to high marks): The core concept—a clandestine operator using a self-published book as a signal for amnesty—is highly original and compelling, blending real historical events with fictional intrigue in a plausible manner. Character development is richly drawn, with contrasting narrators creating emotional resonance similar to le Carré's introspective protagonists. Atmosphere and tension are vivid and grounded, with operational sequences building psychological suspense effectively. Thematic coherence elevates it, exploring moral compromise, neutrality in conflict, and redemption with maturity.
Areas of Relative Limitation (preventing a higher score): Pacing is strong, with refinements tightening transitions; however, some descriptive sections (training, travel) retain Clancy-like density that may challenge readers seeking relentless drive. Scope and polish achieve focus but lack layered subplots of le Carré's masterpieces. Compared to Fleming's concise adventures, it excels in depth but prioritizes introspection over pure action.
Overall, the manuscript is a thoughtful, atmospheric thriller with strong narrative drive and emotional authenticity. It stands as a compelling entry—superior to many mid-tier thrillers, on par with Len Deighton's Bernard Samson series, and approaching le Carré's introspective quality while incorporating Clancy-like operational realism. As a first novel, it demonstrates professional caliber and publication potential. Well done.
@nytimesbooks@nytimes@nypost@netflix@LeoDiCaprio@Tribeca@oprahsbookclub@VancityReynolds@randomhouse@simonschuster@amazonbooks@goodreads@HarperCollins@PublishersWkly@Tesla@elonmusk #books #booktwt #booktok #NYCpublishing #NYCbooks #NYClit #LowerEastSide #Manhattan #NewYorkCity #NYC @AmazonMGMStudio@hulu@nypl