In a paper just published in @sciencemagazine, we teamed up with @teichlab to construct the most detailed atlas to date of hormone production and action in humans at cellular resolution. (1/8)
Link: https://t.co/5iPOCq9yfu
Been finding some interesting books on https://t.co/WvK4teGiCp using a little tool I made that provides a UI to easily look for items with missing metadata or low download counts. https://t.co/dwx8ulDqPp
If math were taught like the humanities: there's no truth in math. It's a vessel for emotions. Here are some numbers; do whatever you want with them. Make things that make you feel good. You may not talk about Euclid, pythagoras, euler, none of them. This isn't a religious institution. Are you using a formula? Cringe. I can't stand fundamentalist textbook thumpers. Gawwd
I’ve also made a NotebookLM video explainer version for anyone who wants a more accessible route into the V600 Programme.
The papers are deliberately careful and technical, but the core idea is simple:
one finite geometric structure, the 600-cell / binary icosahedral group 2I, keeps producing the same kind of structural fingerprints across several domains.
The podcast walks through why the sequence matters:
• 4/16 = 1/4 as a finite incidence identity
• Eq = 5/2 as a discrete σ-pair excitation
• τσ as a Galois-coset duality
• 13/12 and 11/12 as exact trace ratios
• Σ_V600 as the shared structural spine
This is not presented as “we solved everything.”
It is a guided explanation of why the same finite object appearing behind multiple physical-looking ratios is worth investigating seriously.
Programme overview:
https://t.co/MZbgxJifHu
As you know it makes no sense that the sun and the moon are the same size. It literally converts atheists. It makes no sense from a material perspective. It makes sense in base chiasmus
Because of the proof the rainbow provides us that the optical field is dependent upon the subject, thank you for this sign that you gave Noah, God, of your ontological covenant with us, it would follow that optical people, or those who trust their eyes enough to move their inner sanctum and holiest place through neuroplasticity into the optical cortex, are philosophical idealists believing the projected mind to be reality itself. Now I read, which means I convert much of what is auditory and even some other things to this optical region as modern science says, but I resist the draw to put my inner sanctum there, because I believe in a God in whose image and likeness I am made, but that I am not that God in fact. Thank you for coming to my Turd Talk.
Frank Wilczek was NOT the first scientist to discover and describe time crystals … it’s actually quite disappointing he takes so much credit — his “seminal” 2012 paper included a single Winfree reference.. at the last minute.
The real father of time crystals is none other than Arthur T. Winfree from his 1980 magnum opus : The Geometry of Biological Time.
https://t.co/OZQKppdGBQ
"We… have been the heirs of this mid-nineteenth-century pedagogical impulse to spare students the subtleties of professional tuning practices." Duffin, 'How Equal Temperament Ruined Harmony and Why You Should Care' (2007:102)