@ron56_ron@SaveUSAKitty Not true - but I guess if you convince enough people not to vote you will get your wish..
BTW Supreme court has just removed a temp stay on voter role verification...
How does a walk out of media play to the Ist amendment rights of the president?
If he can say what he likes, but no journalist has to report his wordss literally and contextually accurately (ie misreporting), is that not censoring and/or silencing him?
Is he not entitled to pursue his own First Amendment rights?
Here's an idea @WhiteHouse :
Change the format and location of press briefingsin response to concerns:
1. All invitations to press briefings reinstated;
2. Press briefings no longer on White House grounds but in a secured building located nearby to increase press and citizen access and reduce security risks at the White House by removing non-staff permanent access;
3. Additionally, these briefings will be open to any and all press representatives on a first come-first served seating basis; and
4. To satisfy fully the intent and nature of the First Amendment private citizens will also be accommodated on the same basis in the same pool.
Thank you for your attention to this matter.
They haven't had press credentials revoked. They have simply had the privilege (not a right in any way and definitely not in the constitution) of access to the White House rescinded.
Their speech has not been censored or limited.
If it was a 'right' then you would be there alongside channel 3 from small-town Idaho. But it's not.
Memory Hole Politics: 10 Times Leftist Presidents Locked Out the Press (THREAD 🧵)
The left wants you to believe that revoking White House press credentials is an unprecedented assault on democracy. Their manufactured outrage is pure theater. Progressive administrations have spent decades weaponizing executive power to silence dissent, punish critical coverage, and banish conservative reporters from public view.
Here are ten documented times Democrat leadership locked out or purged dissenting journalists: