GADGET_LORD

Phone sales and repair services

[Department of War CTO @DoWCTO]

If you hurt Americans, or are planning to hurt Americans, there is nowhere you can hide. 🇺🇸

[GADGET_LORD @iykfixit]

@dodomayanaa @esonachina @MODEPADA1 @dipoaina1 The universe is keeping records.
Continue gaslighting yourselves

[Mike Arnold @MikeArnoldTruth]

Been studying the writings of Usman dan Fodio. According to him, neither infidels nor apostates are "innocent." They are in a state requiring subjugation, conversion, emigration pressure, or combat under Sharia rules. He was not vague bout this.

-- For primary texts, see translations of Bayan Wujub al-Hijra (F.H. el-Masri) or Wathiqat Ahl al-Sudan.

So when the Sultan of Sokoto -- his descendant, who grew up on his teachings and sits on his throne -- says it's a sin to kill "the innocent" it is a calculated media statement to appear "peaceful" while intentionally saying NOTHING that will STOP the ongoing massacre, rape, enslavement and displacement in his kingdom.

Why not say "STOP KILLING PEOPLE, PERIOD"?

Why not speak against the industrialized looting of minerals in his domain -- could be as much as $180 Billion during his reign? Does he perhaps collect jizya from the Chinese who are doing the looting?

MR. SULTAN, YOUR SILENCE IS EVIDENCE.

@sultan_ofsokoto

#EarthShaker

[GADGET_LORD @iykfixit]

@MODEPADA1 @dipoaina1 @dodomayanaa Yoruba and South Africa are the same. We go soon give una the South Africa treatment

[Benjamin Netanyahu - בנימין נתניהו @netanyahu]

כל עוד אני ראש ממשלת ישראל - לאיראן לא יהיה נשק גרעיני.

יש ביני לבין הנשיא טראמפ הסכמה מלאה בנושא.

כבר למעלה מ-30 שנה אני בחזית המאבק הבינלאומי נגד תכנית הגרעין של איראן.

אלמלא המאבק הזה לאיראן היו מזמן פצצות אטום להשמדת ישראל.

איראן פועלת להשמיד את מדינת היהודים, ואני מקדיש את חיי כדי למנוע מהם מלעשות זאת.

כל עוד אני ראש ממשלת ישראל, זה לא יקרה.

[biafra news & world News @biafra_newsUSB]

This Is What Nigeria Terrorists Military @DHQNigeria Are Doing In Biafra Land Killing Innocent Biafrans With The Help Of @UKParliament @FinGovernment @alexstubb & The Whole World Is Keeping Quite Over It. @FoxNews @TrumpDailyPosts @netanyahu @POTUS @PeteHegseth @hrw @VP @amnesty

[Mike Arnold @MikeArnoldTruth]

The FBI has been notified.

This is what you get from the Sultan's boys when you tell the truth about Nigeria.

#EarthShaker

[Gossip Mill Nigeria @GossipMillNaija]

Breaking News: The Crowd is Building as we speak!! VDM and Ratel Movement shutdown Abuja for Tinubu and Bandits Must Go Protest!!! ✊✊

[Rachel Nwosu @ObiJYkKg6QGWMAD]

We returned home very proud and with our spirit very high. I kept saying our tanks giving to Elohim and he sent them to me yesterday one by one, by one. All hail Biafra. Sll hail Israel🇮🇱✡See you soon at the foriegn affairs committee meeting. More good news will come soon🙏🏽

[Mike Arnold @MikeArnoldTruth]

Clinically, this ideology is narcissistic sociopathy.

“We are a religion of peace. Question that and we will kill you. And it will be your fault, because we hate you.”

This person is succinctly and accurately sharing tenets of their faith, he is not an outlier.

Wake up.

[Rachel Nwosu @ObiJYkKg6QGWMAD]

Good hard work that comes from the heart, with loyalty brings good results. Most of the Israeli foriegn affairs committee members at our parliament signed on our document and soon we will have a wonderful deliberation meeting .Biafra is becoming an agenda in Israel❤

[Pete Hegseth @PeteHegseth]

🇺🇸

[F A A R E E S 💫 🇵🇸 @MFaarees_]

No matter how big the mess we are in under Tinubu is, it all started under Buhari.

We need a totally different people, party, ideology and mindset to get Nigeria out of this mess.

We need Peter Obi.

[Harry Da Diegot @trigottista]

Who cheers unknown armed men? 🤷🏿

[Harry Da Diegot @trigottista]

There are people on this app who aided and abetted this fraud

Don’t act like you don’t know them

[HABIBU YUSUF SODANGI @HabibaIdri40129]

I have never see a Fulani person been tortured by Fulani terrorists or being kidnapped raped by them. It is always the Hausa people and other indigenous groups who suffer this humiliation. Therefore, we must rise up, because the Fulani want to conquer Nigeria& enslave Nigerians.

[aloy ejimakor @AloyEjimakor]

The Biafran Question Can Only Be Resolved Through Dialogue, Not Arrests, Prosecution – Aloy Ejimakor

By @SaharaReporters

Prominent lawyer and special counsel to imprisoned Indigenous People of Biafra (IPOB) leader, Nnamdi Kanu, Barrister Aloy Ejimakor, has argued that the long-running Biafra agitation can only be effectively addressed through dialogue rather than arrests, prosecutions, or other law enforcement measures.

Speaking during an exclusive interview with Rudolf Okonkwo on 90MinutesAfrica, Ejimakor described the agitation for Biafra as a political issue rooted in demands for self-determination, insisting that the Nigerian government should engage aggrieved groups through negotiations.

According to him, those seeking self-determination are essentially asking for a seat at the negotiating table rather than seeking confrontation with the state.

"When people engage in agitations for self-determination, they are actually asking to come to the table," he said. "The best answer to such agitations is not the use of law enforcement but dialogue."

Ejimakor maintained that the continued agitation in the South-East demonstrates that security measures alone have failed to resolve the matter. He argued that the Nigerian government should invite proponents of self-determination to discuss their grievances and aspirations, noting that such discussions are common in democratic societies.

He cited Article 20 of the African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights, which recognizes the right of peoples to self-determination. While acknowledging the authority of the Nigerian state to reject demands for secession, he stressed that any such decision should emerge from constructive engagement rather than coercive measures.

"The state may refuse self-determination, but it must do so across the table through dialogue and negotiation," he stated.

Ejimakor also expressed concern over what he described as growing frustration among people in the South-East. He warned against actions that could further alienate the region, saying there appears to be attempts to provoke widespread resentment in the South-East.

He noted that despite dissatisfaction with the current political situation, many people in the South-East continue to participate in Nigeria's democratic process because they still consider themselves part of the country.

According to him, one of the major sources of discontent remains the continued detention of Nnamdi Kanu. He argued that regardless of political affiliations, many residents of the region are unhappy with the situation and view it as a symbol of unresolved grievances.

Also, addressing speculation that some South-East political leaders may be hindering efforts to secure Kanu's freedom, Ejimakor rejected the claim and insisted that ultimate responsibility rests with President Bola Tinubu.

He described Kanu's case as a federal matter and argued that the President possesses the constitutional and political authority to make a decisive intervention if he chooses to do so.

"The buck stops at the President's table," Ejimakor said. "Any narrative suggesting that South-East governors are responsible for Kanu's continued detention is merely an attempt to shift responsibility away from the Presidency."

He further contended that blaming regional political leaders risks dividing the Igbo people and diverting attention from the federal government's role in resolving the issue.

The lawyer concluded by reiterating that dialogue remains the most effective path toward lasting peace and national unity. He urged the federal government to engage in sincere negotiations over the grievances driving the Biafra agitation and to address the controversy surrounding Kanu's conviction and life imprisonment.

[Kanunta kanu @MaziKanuntaKanu]

REBUTTAL: THE ECULAW ASSESSMENT MISREADS THE BRIEF’S ACTUAL STRUCTURE

The Eculaw assessment criticises a simpler version of the arguments than the one set out in the filed Brief. It treats the Brief as a collection of ordinary, separate legal grounds and then judges them one by one. The Brief itself says something different from the start: the eight issues are presented as connected constitutional requirements — each one a necessary condition that must be satisfied before any lawful conviction can exist. If any single condition fails, the whole proceeding collapses.

That is not just a matter of style. It is a fundamentally different way of looking at the case.

Eculaw’s approach is horizontal. It scores each issue separately:

Issue 1 = strength score
Issue 2 = strength score
Issue 3 = strength score

The Brief’s approach is vertical. It asks a sequence of linked questions:

Was there lawful seisin?
If yes — was there an extant written law properly used through charge, plea, trial and conviction?
If yes — did personal jurisdiction exist under the governing statute?
If yes — was there proof?
If yes — was there fair hearing?
If yes — did any lis survive?

These are not the same analytical structure. One treats the conviction as a collection of separate complaints. The other treats it as a chain of constitutional conditions that must all hold. The Eculaw assessment never really engages the second structure.

1. Issue One Is Not a General “Repeal” Argument — And Eculaw Didn’t Even Score It Properly

Eculaw describes the repeal point as roughly:

> “The old law was repealed, so the conviction is bad.”

That is not how the filed Brief frames it.

Issue One is built around a specific question Justice Lawal Garba asked in the Supreme Court’s own remittal judgment:

> “Are the Statutes or Acts stated in the charge valid and subsisting legislations or Laws in Nigeria which provide for the offences charged?”

The Brief treats this as a gateway the Supreme Court itself created. It says the gateway was limited to what was written on the charge sheet, and it was conditional — if the charge failed the first test, the rest of the remittal did not open. The Brief shows that on 21 March 2025 the charge sheet named statutes that were no longer in force. Because that first requirement was not met, the Brief argues, lawful continuation never began.

Eculaw never properly scored this argument on its own terms. They bypassed the gateway framing and the four-corners test, and simply aggregated parts of it into a generic “repeal is arguable but contested” category. That is not a score. It is a bypass.

2. Issue Two Focuses on the Full Procedural Chain

Eculaw again reduces this to a repeal point. The filed Brief does something more specific.

It repeatedly returns to a clear sequence:

> written law in force → charge → plea → trial → conviction

The question it asks is whether an existing written law was properly used at every step of that chain on 20 November 2025. The Brief points to the trial judge’s own words on 4 November 2025 — that without a written law there can be no conviction — and shows that neither the court nor the prosecution ever identified such a law operating through the entire process.

This is more precise than a simple “repeal equals nullity” claim.

3. The Fair Hearing Ground Is Connected to the Earlier Issues

Eculaw treats the denial of final address and allocutus as ordinary procedural complaints.

The filed Brief links these complaints directly to Issues One and Two. The Record shows the jurisdictional and repeal objections were raised, the court said they could be dealt with in the final written address, the Appellant prepared to file that address, it was refused, and conviction followed immediately.

@Eculawnews @njcNig @NigerianBarz @StateDept @UKParliament @FCDOGovUK @UNDPPA @UN @amnesty @MikeArnoldTruth

[Mike Arnold @MikeArnoldTruth]

So, Tinubu is prosecuting a citizen for sharing a fake AI-generated audio of him.

Shouldn't Tinubu himself be prosecuted for sharing an AI generated image of himself to deceive the Nigerian people?

Remember, his office posted a Grok-generated image of Tinubu with the Rwandan president. Did they really meet? Where? What were they doing? Who knows?

Hypocritical tyrant.

#EarthShaker

[Karigwe (Prophet of Thoughts) @Karigwe]

PRESS STATEMENT

OBIDIENT MOVEMENT REJECTS THE APPOINTMENT OF THEO ABU AGADA AND DEMANDS ACCOUNTABILITY FROM NDC LEADERSHIP AND TANKO YUNUSA

The attention of the Obidient Movement has been drawn to the appointment of Theo Abu Agada as Director of New Media and Strategic Communications by the Nigeria Democratic Congress, NDC.

We condemn this appointment in the strongest possible terms.

This appointment is not just insensitive. It is a direct insult to their presidential candidate, Peter Obi, the Obidient Movement, and the millions of Nigerians who have stood firmly behind a movement built on competence, character, justice, accountability, and people-centred politics.

A party that claims to value the Obidient Movement cannot turn around and appoint a man whose public record is filled with repeated attacks, insults, and open hostility towards their presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and Obidients. You cannot disrespect the largest support base within your political structure and still pretend you are building unity.

Theo Abu Agada has publicly described supporters of their presidential candidate, Peter Obi, in insulting terms. He has questioned Peter Obi’s capacity, portrayed him as a threat to free speech, accused his supporters with reckless language, and repeatedly made statements that show clear contempt for the same movement NDC now expects to energise its public communication.

Even worse, he once claimed that Peter Obi had “unleashed his IPOB supporters on Nigerians.” That kind of statement goes beyond political disagreement. It is a dangerous attempt to link their presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and Obidients to IPOB, and by extension paint the movement with the brush of extremism and terrorism. No serious political party that respects Peter Obi or the Obidient Movement should reward such a person with a sensitive communications position.

Can NDC appoint someone who has publicly insulted and disparaged Rabiu Kwankwaso or the Kwankwasiyya Movement into a sensitive communications position and expect Kwankwasiyya supporters to clap for it? Can NDC reward someone who has repeatedly attacked Kwankwaso and still claim it respects his movement?

If the answer is no, then why does NDC think it can do this to their presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and the Obidient Movement?

The NDC leadership must explain how such a person passed through any serious political vetting process for a sensitive communications role. New Media and Strategic Communications is not a decoration. It is the public voice of a party. Appointing someone with a history of hostility towards their presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and the Obidient Movement into that office sends a very clear message, and the message is disrespect.

This also raises serious questions about the role and effectiveness of Tanko Yunusa as the leader of the Obidient Movement.

What exactly is Tanko doing?

In the Labour Party, he was always seen around the leadership, taking pictures and standing close to Peter Obi, yet the same Labour Party repeatedly disrespected Peter Obi and the movement he was supposed to represent.

In ADC, the same pattern repeated itself. The Obidient Movement was treated with disregard, and its value was undermined.

Now in NDC, the same thing is happening again. The party leadership continues to disregard the Obidient Movement, even though Obidients remain the largest, loudest, and most active stakeholder group in this political alignment. That disregard has now reached their presidential candidate, Peter Obi, directly through the appointment of someone whose public record shows open hostility towards him.

So we ask again: what exactly is Tanko doing?

Is he there to defend the movement, or to take pictures?

Is he there to protect Peter Obi’s political leverage, or to stand in rooms like a mannequin?

Is he there to represent Obidients, or to lock comment sections whenever people ask uncomfortable questions?

Tanko Yunusa must answer a simple question: what the hell is he doing?

The Obidient Movement cannot continue to be treated as a crowd for rallies, online engagement, and political optics, while those who openly insult the movement are put in strategic positions where they will continue the insults.

We demand the following:

1. The immediate reversal of Theo Abu Agada’s appointment.
2. A public explanation from the NDC leadership on how this appointment was approved.
3. A formal apology to their presidential candidate, Peter Obi, and the Obidient Movement.
4. A clear commitment from NDC that no individual with a public record of hostility towards Peter Obi or the Obidient Movement will be placed in any sensitive strategic communication role.
5. A full explanation from Tanko Yunusa on what he is doing as leader of the Obidient Movement and why this pattern of disrespect keeps repeating itself under his watch.

The Obidient Movement is not a spare tyre. We are not political furniture. We are not a movement to be used when convenient and disrespected when power is being shared.

If NDC wants the energy, credibility, reach, and sacrifice of Obidients, then it must treat the movement with respect.

Anything short of that is unacceptable.

Karigwe
Prophet of Thoughts

For and on behalf of Obidients, since the leadership of the Movement is sleeping.