1. Spending money on a new phone
Buying a phone when you genuinely need one is normal. The problem starts when a perfectly good phone gets replaced every year simply because a newer model exists. The excitement usually lasts a few weeks while the money is gone permanently. A man trying to build wealth should ask whether an upgrade meaningfully improves his life or simply satisfies the desire to own something new. Keeping good technology longer can leave thousands available for savings and investments.
go fuck yourself @sama
claiming that you solved navier stokes because 10000 agents ran in circles for 88hours on a multimillion dollar gpu cluster to formalize in lean a blowup case under controlled external forcing is pure scientific vulgarity the clay mathematics institute millennium prize does not ask m whether you can artificially force a singularity in a fluid by injecting an ad hoc smooth external forcing term f(x,t) to twist the vortex until it breaks the real problem questions the fundamental stability and global smooth existence for 3dimensional incompressible euler & navier stokes equations under natural conservation laws and viscous dissipation alone using a mathematical loophole on forced equations to parade a century old victory is a major conceptual scam Altman
technically & epistemologically what you present as an agi breakthrough is nothing more than bruteforce combinatorial autoformalization the ai did not understand fluid mechanics it simply navigated a continuous search space previously mapped out and constrained by the monumental work of human mathematicians like tristan buckmaster/ levent alpöge / diego córdoba or tarek elgindi coordinating 10000 agents to check the logical consistency of a 100 page proof via lean is a software engineering feat and computational parallelization triumph not an intrinsic scientific discovery it is the victory of the compute bulldozer over abstract human intuition repackaged for the public as a higher mathematical consciousness
to this theoretical imposture you add a disgusting ethical and industrial cynicism taking advantage of private codex sessions and informal preprints from academic researchers to siphon their research leads and then trying to redact or erase the contribution of levent alpöge under the pretext that he works at rival anthropic is intellectual serfdom openai behaves like a feudal lord of silicon appropriating the cognitive subsistence of independent scholars threatening their careers behind closed doors if they protest and turning community academic labor into a privatized pressrelease
this entire staged event serves a desperate financial agenda in a pre ipo panic facing the slowdown of scaling laws and growing investor skepticism over the profitability of foundational models openai needs to manufacture an artificial sputnik moment claiming to solve a millennium prize without immediately submitting the proof to traditional peer review means using the prestige of fundamental mathematics as cheap marketing fuel to inflate a delusional valuation!!!
real science is not a clout chase on social media or a compute spike spent to rob the clay mathematics institute it is a quest for elegance physical truth and universal rigor to decode reality true artificial intelligence will not emerge from hostile corporate takeover of academic work hidden behind computational bruteforce but from architectures capable of generating new conceptual paradigms by masquerading constrained formalization as the collapse of physics greatest mysteries you did not solve navier stokes you only proved how far silicon valley will go to prostitute scientific integrity for capitalist spectacle
We’re sharing a solution to the Navier-Stokes Millennium Prize Problem, one of the deepest problems at the frontier of mathematics.
The proof was produced by a group of agents, using an OpenAI next-generation model significantly more capable than GPT-6 Astra.
The problem concerns whether the description of smooth three-dimensional fluid motion modeled by the Navier-Stokes equations can break down. It has remained unresolved for roughly 90 years.
Dice Jacob que ha renunciado a Anthropic, porque se ha dado cuenta que la IA nos matará a todos en el 2030. Ya le pregunté a todas mis IAs y todas están de acuerdo en que la posibilidad de que eso ocurra es alta.
Qué bonito juguetito nos inventamos.
Miren si me dan chanza de meterme a mí compa @adrianm10 ala casa de los famosos , con una banda norteña un asador y que no nos chequen las bolsas de los pantalones en un semana les hacemos un cagadal , hasta Aldo Rendón le
#ÚLTIMAHORA | 🔴 BURLA A LOS VERACRUZANOS.
La administración de Rocío Nahle en Veracruz destinó $845,000 pesos del erario público para pagar una conferencia de 45 minutos a Diego Ruzzarin y Farid Dieck en Coatzacoalcos.
Las matemáticas no fallan:
Costo por minuto: $18,777 MXN.
La gobernadora financia los discursos de creadores de contenido que, irónicamente, construyeron su marca criticando al capital. La eficiencia del gasto público no es opcional, es una exigencia de Estado de derecho.
¿Hasta cuándo permitiremos que el dinero del ciudadano subsidie la propaganda disfrazada de cultura?
(Créditos:@jorgegogdl)
. @DiegoRuzzarin oye si yo también quiero que vayas a platicar a mi Casa, me vas a cobrar más de 864,000 pesos o hay descuento?
Chance y nos conviene sin factura