.

inactive most of the time

[Deeqa 🇸🇴 @Deee_luul]

Just days after posting this, you were in Somalia shaking hands with a former warlord and ex-terrorist.

What exactly were you doing in Somalia? How did you allow yourself to sit side by side with a former terrorist as if you were equals? What a farce.

[susan abulhawa | سوزان ابو الهوى @susanabulhawa]

the largest mass funeral in recorded history, and not a peep from mainstream western media.

[. @j7xee9]

@Knowledge_iii Not a civil war

[Sky News @SkyNews]

Patients refusing to be treated by non-white staff as NHS reports shocking rise in racism

https://t.co/eJMZ8bybam

[Power to the People ☭🕊 @ProudSocialist]

Michigan voter: “I voted for Abdul because he doesn’t take money from AIPAC. I’m not voting for anybody who takes money from AIPAC.”

Reporter: “And why is that?”

Michigan voter: “Because the money should be spent here not over there [in Israel].”

[Afshin Rattansi @afshinrattansi]

Today is war criminal Barack Obama’s birthday.

In 2009, Haiti’s🇭🇹 parliament passed a significant minimum wage increase to around $5 per day improve conditions for its working class.

Obama intervened to force Haiti to keep the minimum wage at $0.31 per hour. His administration was concerned that the minimum wage increase to the poverty wage of $5 a day would raise costs for US companies sourcing garments from Haiti.

[AFRICAN & BLACK HISTORY @AfricanArchives]

Many people use the phrase “The Black Holocaust” to describe the centuries of enslavement, racial terror and systemic oppression experienced by people of African descent. While the term is not universally used by historians because “Holocaust” most commonly refers to the genocide of six million Jews during World War II, those who use it believe it reflects the enormous scale of suffering, loss of life and dehumanization endured by millions of Africans and their descendants across generations.

The history often begins in 1619, when the first recorded Africans arrived in the English colony of Virginia. Over the next 246 years, slavery became one of the foundations of the American economy. Millions of Africans were forced across the Atlantic through the transatlantic slave trade, separated from their families, stripped of their identities and subjected to generations of forced labor. Their work helped build industries, cities and wealth while they themselves were denied even the most basic human rights.

The abolition of slavery in 1865 marked a major turning point, but it did not end racial inequality. Across much of the United States, Jim Crow laws enforced segregation for decades, creating separate schools, neighborhoods, transportation and public facilities while restricting voting rights and economic opportunities for Black Americans.

This period was also marked by racial terror. Thousands of Black men, women and children were lynched between the late nineteenth and mid twentieth centuries. These murders were often carried out publicly to intimidate entire communities and maintain white supremacy. Today, memorials and historical research continue to document these victims so their stories are never forgotten.

The Civil Rights Movement challenged this system through peaceful protest, legal action and grassroots organizing. Courageous individuals and communities fought for equal rights, leading to historic legislation such as the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965. These victories transformed American society, but they came after generations of sacrifice and resilience.

If you love our content and would like to support the page, you can buy us a coffee here: https://t.co/K1AhtZuOFs or tap Link in Bio

[. @j7xee9]

@Somali_Stream This is plain faced neo-colonialism

[Tablesalt 🇨🇦🇺🇸 @Tablesalt13]

‼️MAJOR BREAKING

Immunology Doctor at Sick Kids Toronto ARRESTED for Child P*rn

Charged with possessing and accessing child abuse and exploitation material, police say

Profile ALREADY removed from Sick kids website.

[Mahad Saeed ❁ AKA Dr Toyota AKA Federaldiid @DrNabadNolol]

Fucking Ahmed Madobe

[🇸🇴 ☭ @chopperwith_]

these cowards always go after women and children.

[Hulk 🇸🇩🇵🇸🇸🇾🍉🍁 @SmartRandomGuy]

Lmfao Ayah actually said that Muslim women are allowed to marry non Muslim men she argues that Quran 5:5 permits men but doesn’t explicitly prohibit women from marrying non Muslim men . This is despite every major scholar saying otherwise .

[Collin Rugg @CollinRugg]

NEW: Alleged OnlyF*ns human trafficker denied bid to lower bail as he is accused of forcing young women against their will to make content.

Nikita Tyukalo, 22, who is accused of contacting girls as minors, allegedly beat and threatened to kill the young women if they refused his demands.

Tyukalo allegedly ran an OF house in Washington, where he allegedly forced women to make adult content.

Victims say Tyukalo would lock them out of their accounts and would not give them access to the money they "earned."

According to neighbors, Tyukalo hosted out-of-control house parties every Saturday night.

Prosecutors now accuse Tyukalo of making a call in Russian on a jailhouse phone, instructing loved ones to move money out of his accounts.

"Mr. Tyukalo may believe that because he speaks Russian, that we don’t know what he is saying on his calls."

Tyukalo's bail is set at $5 million.

He claims he has no money, yet his entire Instagram profile is him flexing all his money and cars.

[Markus Virgil Hoehne @HoehneVirgil]

Good news!
https://t.co/HXWPVRMHPK

[Markus Virgil Hoehne @HoehneVirgil]

You mean: "Come to Isaaqland to face tribal bullying", right? I was in Somaliland back then when it resembled a de facto state. In my view, it degenerated over past years into what its enemies always had suspected it to be: a one clan family fiefdom. So, what to expect from it but clanish hatred if you voice critique or blind support if you are a supporter? The Nimko Ali affair proved the case.

[Markus Virgil Hoehne @HoehneVirgil]

I can only agree with Libaan @Araleonx . Indeed, if the Somaliland government would have provided reliable evidence to @NimkoAli while she was pursuing her "truth defence" (basically arguing that her allegations against me were true) it would have made a huge difference. Nimko was looking for evidence for two years but obviously could not provide things that could stand scrutiny in a British court. This is why she had to agree to apologise and pay compensation. The gov. in Hargeysa "jumping" to back her claims AFTER the binding mediation agreement indicates that private tribal matters are what the @slmolsaf is actually involved in. Isaaq defending Isaaq, no matter what. And this is called "government"?

[KarenOfSomalia @basicsuburbank]

@slmolsaf Whole clan fighting off 1 cadaan guy🤣😭

[Elham Ishmael ✍︎ @EIshmael_]

Muna Wais Fidhin is a 44-year-old woman from Minnesota who has been charged in the massive $250 million "Feeding Our Future" pandemic fraud case, have posted on her Facebook a pictures with Bashir Goth, the so-called U.S. ambassador for the secessionist ONE enclave “Somaliland”

[Libaan MG @Araleonx]

**If the Somaliland government had issued this statement before the UK legal settlement was reached, either they or Nimco Ali would have been forced to produce actual evidence in court. Instead, it only appeared three days after she was compelled to retract and apologise**

1) The Somaliland government’s 2 July 2026 statement directly contradicts the legally binding apology and settlement Nimco Ali reached with Dr Markus Hoehne on 29 June 2026.
In that settlement, Ms Ali accepted that Dr Hoehne “was not expelled from Somaliland for any such conduct” and apologised unreservedly. Three days later, the government claims he was deported over “documented concerns” relating to the abuse of young girls. These positions cannot both be correct.

2) This is made more serious by who made the original allegation.
Nimco Ali is the CEO and co-founder of a charity whose work centres on protecting women and girls from abuse and violence. She chose to make this grave public accusation on social media in March 2023 rather than reporting it to police or child protection authorities in the UK, Germany, or Somaliland.

3) Even more striking is the Somaliland government’s long silence.
For over three years - while Ms Ali publicly claimed that Somaliland had expelled Dr Hoehne for abusing girls - the government issued no statement and took no public action. It stayed silent throughout the UK legal proceedings.
It only spoke on 2 July 2026, three days after Ms Ali was legally compelled to retract the allegation and pay compensation.

4) If the government genuinely possessed documented evidence of child abuse in 2023, why did it remain silent when a public statement could have supported Ms Ali’s position? Why wait until after a UK court process forced her to withdraw the claim?

**Its absence until now suggests the government preferred to let the allegation linger against a vocal critic rather than substantiate it.**

5) The government’s own statement is also weak on its face.
It refers only to “documented concerns” and “alleged abuse” - not charges, not prosecution, not conviction. It describes the removal as an “administrative measure” and says proceedings “may be initiated” if Dr Hoehne returns (future tense). If real evidence of child abuse existed, why was there no criminal process at the time? Why were German authorities not informed?

6) Allegations of this seriousness should be backed by evidence and proper process - not deployed on social media by a charity leader working on abuse issues, left unaddressed by the government for years, and only revived after a court-forced retraction.
Until the Somaliland government answers basic questions with actual documentation (which authority investigated, when, what criminal steps followed, and why none were taken earlier), this statement raises far more questions than it answers.

[Libaan MG @Araleonx]

You have publicly confessed to branding an academic a paedophile - and admitted it was entirely false. That academic was an outspoken critic of Somaliland, a political project you actively champion. These are not coincidental facts.

To then invoke anonymous "third parties" as cover is not a defence; it is a deliberate insult to the intelligence of anyone reading this.

It is my view that a reasonable observer can draw only one inference: this was not an innocent blunder, but a calculated strike against a critic whose work threatened your political narrative.

The true gravity lies in your own public mission. You built a platform on protecting women and girls. Deploying a paedophile smear against an inconvenient academic does not merely fall short of that standard -it actively weaponises the very abuse narrative you claim to fight. On the ethical standards you publicly profess, this conduct is a fundamental repudiation of everything you claim to stand for.