What's being defended isn't billionaires.
What's being defended is the principle that rights belong to everyone, including successful people.
The moment you decide someone's rights disappear because they're too wealthy, you've abandoned rights altogether and replaced them with political favoritism.
Your position isn't that rights are universal.
It's that rights are conditional on serving your demands.
The billionaire is just today's unpopular exception. Tomorrow it'll be the millionaire. Then the small business owner. Then anyone with more than you.
I honestly can’t believe the audacity of these people who enrich themselves without adding a scrap of value to the world to complain like this.
Literally in the back of a chauffeur driven taxpayer funded limo.
@Heccles94 I have great news! Left wing governments the world over control much more money than that. All of humanity’s problems have therefore been solved.
@VreeseSebastien Euh je suis le premier à haïr cette taxe de plus (qui sera 30% dans 10 ans on le voit venir). Mais le déclarer et “garder” les preuves c’est juste extraire les transactions de ton broker, ça paraît assez logique comme toute facture que tu déduit de tes impôts
@LauraTessier10@Boumboumfr C’est pour ça que les banques se calibrent sur ceux qui ne savent rien, donc mettent des conseillers qui ne savent quasi rien et ça passe. Et mtn ils vont pleurer parce que 3 questions à ChatGPT suffisent à en savoir plus qu’eux
Amazing to me how liberals must to be shown things explicitly before they begin to comprehend what most of the population understand instinctively.
“It turned out these prisoners are bad, and maybe there is a good reason to lock them up. I had never thought of it like that”