@landen472@CieranNieldPNE@payprincessrae Think the one I had was just a game wide issue, it was back on the next day. I’m not online atm though so maybe it’s happened again not sure
@ratfuckerkeller@CieranNieldPNE @ScheduledLoss @payprincessrae Was hoping it wasn’t just me aha. Messed with someone who was modding on bo2 yesterday and was worried they’d somehow fucked my account up 🤣
@CieranNieldPNE @ScheduledLoss @payprincessrae I’m on series x too, keeps giving me error code 8015190E. None of the solutions online seem to work either
@luma_official_@Gotham_HER0@Francis21531088@cyclonUK Because his view was restricted by the players in front, leading to a misjudgement in the header. Why tf would a defender duck away from the ball 6 yards out in the last minute knowing he has a player behind him for a tap in
@max_the_greatl@GroggyGunner@markgoldbridge The ball is landing right where is head is, he has mistimed his header. There is no way you can say he is ducking out of the way of the ball in that position of the pitch in that scenario when there is a Croatia attacker right behind him for an easy goal.
@Zephyr10X @GroggyGunner@markgoldbridge “If the pass, attempt to gain possession or clearance by the player in control of the ball is inaccurate or unsuccessful, this does not negate the fact that the player ‘deliberately played’ the ball.” Official offside law. Should have been a goal
@max_the_greatl@GroggyGunner@markgoldbridge I would argue and say that it was deliberate. He is lowering his head to clear the ball. No defender in their right mind would duck out of the way of the ball in the middle of the area knowing
that players could be in behind for a tap in
@GroggyGunner@markgoldbridge But then Veiga makes a deliberate attempt to play the ball which then negates the offside call if it did happen to touch the Croatia players head, so should’ve been a goal
@Bri_an2 And I would say he did as he was adjusting his head to make contact as he was assuming they would miss the ball, therefore the goal should have stood (2)
@Bri_an2 So the rules state that if an attacker makes initial contact and a defender then makes a “deliberate” attempt to play the ball on the way through to the receiving attacker, that the goal should be onside. So it all depends whether Veiga intentionally played the ball…(1)
@FabrizioRomano At the end of the day, the accusations made towards Barcelona are slanderous and could easily be met with a lawsuit. It’s plain and simple to see that Barcelona have been better than them for the last 2 years, nothing to do with corruption
@FayazLambat @l4pablo Took 5 players out of the game, made the pass inside, which was then passed to gakpo, and I don’t need to say anymore as to what happened next, I think you can guess…