.@RepYvetteClarke@gillibrandny@SenSchumer, essential pro-nuclear incentives 45U, 45Y, and 48E are crucial for the future of nuclear energy in the U.S. These incentives MUST NOT be undone in reconciliation discussions.
@FightFossils Only problem is that AOC does not mention the highly crucial use of peaceful nuclear energy yet. That's OK,
For progressive politicians, peaceful nuclear energy is still the elephant in the room
@NYCDSA_Ecosoc As a member of DSA, I am appalled that you still adhering to that flawed and backward "Kindergarten " ideology" of 100% renewable only. Socialize peaceful Nuclear energy instead.
Go with the future,
@billmckibben@NaomiAKlein@SvitlanaRomanko Naomi book on branding is great, but both Bill McKibben and Naomi Klein's stance against Nuclear Energy and instead supporting the flawed "kindergarten" ideology of 100% renewable puts them squarely in the camp with millionaires Robert Kennedy, Drummond Pike and Bloomberg.
Join me and over one million others in supporting a different model for open, independent journalism. Together we can help safeguard the Guardian’s future – so more people, across the world, can keep accessing factual information for free https://t.co/Ne1Ziwi2UE
@billmckibben and Bill are you still peddling renewables as the sole solution to the climate crisis or are you willing to include nuclear? (a fellow baby boomer geezer)
@mzjacobson UN resolution 68/32 made it illegal to design, produce or trade in nuclear weapons. U.S., Russia, China, France , Britain, Pakistan and India did not sign it. The U.N. supports atoms for Peace. 100% renewables leads to Green neo-colonialism. Thank Eve for biting the apple.
@krusehamburg@AnnaGallinaHH Thank you for your positive comment about nuclear energy. An especially courageous statement , as does not fall in with your Party and its coalition. Hope my Democratic Socialist in New York will change too.
@JohanSollid Very connivingly presented, being a member of Nuclear New York, we are constantly pointing out the short comings and irresponsibility of overreliance on renewables. Your article gives as an additional example rooted in a historical realty of why we need nuclear.