Founder & SEO Director of @breaktheweb. I love flying through the air and helping pages show up in Search. ๐ช ๐ ๐ฅ - Rarely on Twitter, find me on LinkedIn
One blog post. Traffic up 19%. ๐๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป๐ ๐๐ฝ ๐ญ๐ฌ๐ฑ%.
This is a single article on a DTC clientโs site. It was already pulling solid traffic in Q2 2025.
Conversion rate was sitting at 0.82%.
Here's what we did: embedded products directly into the pain/solution content using the @Bloggleapp blog builder.
The article talks about a specific problem. The product that solves it appears inline and in a floating sidebar.
Right there. Not buried at the end. Not in a separate "shop" section.
Q2 2025: 2,444 sessions โ 20 conversions (0.82% CVR)
Q4 2025: 2,900 sessions โ 41 conversions (1.41% CVR)
The conversion rate doubled. Revenue from this one post jumped 70%.
This is the easiest content marketing optimization most Shopify stores are missing.
You're already ranking. You're already pulling traffic. You're just not converting it because the path to purchase is too far removed from the moment of intent.
The reader learns about their problem. They see the solution. They can buy it without leaving the page.
Q1 2026 is already tracking higher than Q4. Same post. Same traffic source. Better conversion setup.
Are your blog posts set up to convert, or are they just set up to inform?
Some domain migrations ๐ญ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐ฌ clean on paper, then traffic falls off a cliff.
Hereโs a real issue we just unraveled after a client migrated domains + CMS platforms and couldnโt figure out why organic traffic tanked.
On the surface?
Users landed on the right pages.
Under the hood?
Google never did.
What was actually happening...
Old URLs followed this path:
1๏ธโฃ https://t.co/GOq2W7XrMa
2๏ธโฃ 301 โ https://t.co/rn6uyXGwDM
3๏ธโฃ 404 returned
4๏ธโฃ JavaScript redirect tries to fire
5๏ธโฃ Humans land on https://t.co/Otzeo9JXlQ
6๏ธโฃ Google stops at step #3 and walks away
Why this breaks SEO:
โณ Google does not execute JavaScript redirects on URLs that return a 404
โณ The redirect chain dies before reaching the final destination
โณ SEO equity never transfers
โณ Migration signals are lost
โณ Pages get treated as brand new, not migrated
So while users were โsuccessfully redirected,โ search engines never saw it.
Thatโs the trap.
Migrations feel obvious and logical.
Browsers are forgiving.
Crawlers are not.
๐ง๐;๐๐ฅ
If a redirect chain includes a 404 before the final URL, Google will not follow JavaScript and your SEO value disappears.
The fix (boring, but correct):
โ Traditional ๐๐ง๐ง๐ฃ ๐ฏ๐ฌ๐ญ directly from https://t.co/aDS5TGudrm โ https://t.co/rbSwjxfudV
โ One hop. Server-side. Final destination.
๐๐ฐ๐ณ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐๐๐ ๐ฏ๐ฆ๐ณ๐ฅ๐ด:
๐๐ฆ ๐ฅ๐ฐ๐ฏโ๐ต ๐ด๐ฆ๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ช๐ด ๐ฐ๐ฏ๐ฆ ๐ฐ๐ง๐ต๐ฆ๐ฏ ๐ข๐ฏ๐ฅ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฐ๐ถ๐จ๐ฉ๐ต ๐บ๐ฐ๐ถ'๐ฅ ๐ฆ๐ฏ๐ซ๐ฐ๐บ.
If youโve ever had a โmigration mystery,โ this is one worth checking.
Most brands arenโt doing SEO. Theyโre just publishing and hoping.
Right now, thereโs no airtight playbook for SEO beyond traditional search engines..
No โperfectโ framework.
No single source of truth.
Search behavior is fractured across platforms, across devices, across algorithms.
So what can you control?
โณ Site architecture that makes sense
โณ Schema thatโs technically sound
โณ Titles that earn the click
โณ External mentions/backlinks that build trust
โณ And a constant loop of data collection to guide every move
Foundational SEO still works.
But only if you're measuring the right things.
Black Friday SEO doesnโt need to be complicated to be effective.
In fact, the highest ROI moves are usually the simplest to implement.
โ You donโt need to overhaul your entire strategy.
โ You donโt need to hire a team of technical SEOs.
โ You just need to execute a few high-impact plays before the BF/CM rush hits.
Some tweaks take only a few minutes, not weeks.
If youโre already planning your Black Friday campaigns, give SEO a seat at the table.
Because a few easy moves now can unlock traffic, visibility and sales when it matters most.
If your category pages are either โblank gridsโ or โwalls of SEO textโ... youโre doing it wrong.
This is one of the most common issues I've see across eComm brands over the last 15 years.
And it usually falls into one of two extremes:
๐ซฅ The Bare Page:
A few products in the grid. No intro. No context. No internal links. Just vibes.
Great for aesthetics, but terrible for SEO and discoverability.
๐ตโ๐ซ The Bloated Page:
3โ5 paragraphs of obvious โSEO textโ shoved above & below the product grid.
Everyone sees it. Everyone scrolls past it.
It doesnโt help the user, and only maybe helps Google. But at what cost to experience?
Neither approach drives sustainable organic growth.
Instead, hereโs what works, and what we help our clients build:
A wireframe that balances UX + SEO:
โ Short, keyword+brand messaging aligned intro above the grid
โ Smart internal linking to sub-collections or guides
โ Visually-enhanced product listings
โ A tight FAQ section with PAA-style questions
โ Strong page titles & meta that match intent
Simple, scalable, and effective.
If your category pages are your most important revenue-driving pages, why are so many brands treating them like afterthoughts?
The goal is visibility and usability.
Donโt bury your SEO under the fold. And donโt starve your customers of context.
Whatโs been your biggest win (or fail) with category page SEO?
In SEO, we donโt make mistakes... just happy little accidents.
You optimize & build for one keywordโฆ
Google ranks you for something elseโฆ
And somehow, that โaccidentโ outperforms the original plan.
Itโs frustrating.
Itโs hilarious.
Itโs SEO.
I guess the algorithm has a brush of its own sometimes.
โWe need more traffic.โ
Ehhh... not you don't!
Because not all organic traffic is created equal.
Early in my career, I remember this one case where helped a brand 3x their organic visitors.
(๐ ๐ด๐ต๐ช๐ญ๐ญ ๐ฉ๐ข๐ท๐ฆ ๐ต๐ฉ๐ฆ ๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฑ๐ฐ๐ณ๐ต๐ด)
But nearly all of clicks were low-intent and for broad irrelevant topics.
No conversions. No impact. Just noise.
The marketing team wasnโt happy that they couldn't explain this internally.
And they were right.
Not more traffic. You need the right traffic!
Otherwise, youโre just feeding dashboards, not revenue.
The best marketers wonโt use AI as advisorsโฆ
Theyโll use AI as assistants.
They know their time is better spent thinking strategically, not buried in repetitive tasks that eat up half the day.
This is exactly why we continue to build TONS of in-house SEO tools for our team.
For example, we built a simple internal link finder.
โ Not to look cool.
โ Not to replace humans.
โ But to ๐๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐๐ฝ the boring stuff.
Hereโs the scenario:
We used to spend 60+ minutes manually finding internal link opportunities for our clients:
ย ย โข Scanning content.
ย ย โข Searching keywords.
ย ย โข Copy/pasting anchor text.
ย ย โข Formatting it for Notion.
Now?
We upload a list of hundreds of URLs, drop in relevant terms, and the target pageโฆ
Within 30 seconds, the tool gives us:
โ Natural internal link suggestions using semantic relevance
โ Pre-formatted Notion markdown (ready to copy + paste)
โ A clear workflow that takes under 20 seconds to execute
No bloat. No overthinking.
Just clean output that helps our team move faster.
Thatโs the real value of AI in marketing.
Not replacing strategy.
Not writing your blog posts for you.
๐๐๐๐ ๐ด๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฏ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ธ ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ, ๐๐ผ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐ป ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฐ๐๐ ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ต๐ฎ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ ๐ด๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ฏ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฒ๐๐๐ฒ๐.
If your SEO strategy keeps โgetting delayedโ because other departments donโt prioritize it, itโs not an execution problem. ๐๐โ๐ ๐ฎ ๐ฏ๐๐-๐ถ๐ป ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ๐บ.
Iโve seen it happen over and over again.
The SEO roadmap is flawlessโtechnical audits, content clusters, internal linking, everything.
But if internal teams donโt understand the strategy, it dies in the email.
SEO doesnโt fail because of Google or AI. It fails because of ๐ต๐๐บ๐ฎ๐ป๐.
โ Because developers donโt see why that โsimple redirectโ actually matters.
โ Because the copy team thinks keywords kill creativity.
โ Because executives want results before the flywheel even starts spinning.
And thatโs where most SEOs drop the ball.
They think their job is to optimize pages.
But their real job?
To translate SEO into something every department actually cares about.
When devs understand that fixing crawl depth improves site speed (which boosts conversions)โฆ they act faster.
When content teams understand that optimizing H1s improves discoverability without killing brand voiceโฆ they buy in.
When leadership understands that SEO/Organic Search is a revenue channel, not a reporting line itemโฆ budgets open up.
Buy-in isnโt a soft skill. Itโs a growth multiplier.
You can have the best roadmap in the world, but without buy-in, itโs just a document.
โSEO is dead.โ
They said it when Panda hit in 2011.
They said it again during the voice search hype in 2018.
And now theyโre saying it because of AI.
But hereโs what they keep missing:
SEO doesnโt die... it evolves!
Iโve been in this game long enough to see every cycle of panic play out the same way.
A new technology shows up, and suddenly, headlines scream that SEO is over.
(๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ด๐ต๐ญ๐บ ๐ง๐ณ๐ฐ๐ฎ ๐ฏ๐ฐ๐ฏ-๐๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ข๐ณ๐ฌ๐ฆ๐ต๐ฆ๐ณ๐ด)
But the truth? AI wonโt replace SEO.
The SEOs who ignore AI? They might get left behind.
But the SEOs who keep their eyes on trends & leverage AI as part of their process?
Theyโll win faster.
Shopify just announced a new partnership with OpenAI (ChatGPT) that could reshape how DTC brands sell.
Theyโre calling it โconversation-driven commerce.โ
The idea?
A shopper can ask ChatGPT for a product recommendation and...
โ Get options
โ Compare
โ Check out
...all without leaving the chat.
No website visit. No funnel. No scroll-stopping ad.
Just a question and a purchase.
Too early to know how users will actually adopt it.
But if you're in eComm, this is worth keeping an eye on.
Search, social, marketplaces โ every major shift in discovery created new winners.
This might be the next surface area.
Would love to hear your take:
Curious? Skeptical? Already experimenting?
If your SEO team is the last to know about site changesโฆ you donโt have a marketing strategy. You have a communication problem.
We once had a dev team deploy โharmlessโ site updates without looping in SEO or even the internal marketing team.
The result?
โข Inconsistent brand messaging from key pages
โข SEO-optimized sections removed entirely
โข Organic performance fluctuated overnight
Thankfully, we caught it early.
Siloed teams kill performance.
โ Brand teams rewriting copy that undercuts search intent
โ CRO teams adjusting layouts that could impact organic visibility
โ Developers shipping updates that accidentally break indexability
โ Content teams creating assets without knowing what buyers actually search for
These arenโt edge cases.
Theyโre common in DTC/B2C orgs that treat SEO as a side dish instead of a revenue channel.
If you want your SEO to actually drive results, it canโt live in isolation.
It needs to sit inside the broader marketing strategy, with communication, transparency, and openness across every function.
Because when SEO works with dev, brand, CRO, and content, it drives the kind of growth everyoneโs aligned around.
@nickeubanks As someone who has spent more time years back than I'm willing to admit securing and holding that "New York SEO" top spot, my one question is... how much revenue is it bringing?
[emd: https://t.co/UgSF01fxVd]
Everyoneโs still shouting: โAI Overviews are killing content.โ
But like most hot takes, itโs not that black and white.
Yes, AI Overviews have definitely reduced clicks across many industries. Especially on top-of-funnel, informational queries.
That partโs not up for debate.
But hereโs what is being overlooked:
Content marketing isnโt dead. ๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฐ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ถ๐.
When your SEO strategy shifts toward specificity, intent, and user journey alignment, you uncover opportunities that ๐ข๐ณ๐ฆ๐ฏโ๐ต swallowed up by AI Overviews.
Weโve been leaning hard into this approach lately:
โณ Content built around high-purchase intent.
โณ Articles crafted to solve specific problems at specific stages of the funnel.
โณ Pages optimized for the exact person whoโs ready to take action, not just browse.
The result?
While overall volume might be down compared to the โgood old days,โ the traffic we are getting is:
โ More qualified
โ Closer to conversion
โ More aligned with buyer personas
And most importantly... itโs still growing.
So, before hitting panic mode over AI Overviews, consider this:
Content isnโt broken.
Your strategy might be.
๐'๐ฑ ๐น๐ผ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ผ ๐ต๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐ณ๐ฟ๐ผ๐บ ๐๐ผ๐. Has an agency actually ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ the impact of their AI optimization services?
Because I keep seeing agencies selling โAI optimization,โ โGEO,โ "AEO," or whatever acronym sounds cutting-edge this week.
But hereโs the issue:
โ No framework.
โ No benchmarks.
โ No consistent outcomes.
โ And no clear consumer behavior to optimize for.
AI search is still the Wild West.
And users havenโt even settled into predictable research habits yet.
Just a lot of shiny packaging around something no one fully understands yet.
Traditional SEO, while still theoretical in nature, has over two decades of patterns, patents, performance data, and conversations to guide it.
AI optimization? Itโs evolving way too fast to lock down.
If someoneโs charging big bucks for this, I hope theyโre showing real outputs, not just assumptions.
Are you successfully measuring outcomes of your AEO work? I'd love to hear from you.
Most AI brand tracking tools donโt tell you how theyโre tracking your brand.
And thatโs a problem.
After building our own internal tracking tool for client use, here are 3 things most marketers (and founders) arenโt thinking about:
๐ญ. ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐.
Not all AI tools surface results from the same place.
Some use real-time search. Some rely on internal knowledge.
For example, GPT-4o-search-preview is one of our go-to models for ChatGPT brand visibility tracking because it runs live searches, while older models are stuck in April 2024.
๐ฎ. ๐๐ผ๐ด๐ด๐ฒ๐ฑ-๐ถ๐ป ๐๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ ๐๐ฒ๐ฒ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐.
Just like Google, AI tools can personalize results.
Memory-enabled chats (even free ones) may return answers shaped by prior history, meaning two users can see two very different versions of your brand.
๐ฏ. ๐ค๐๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฎ ๐ถ๐ ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ ๐๐ผ ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ ๐๐ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ๐บ๐.
Quora is blocking AI platforms via their robots.txt, which means it's likely not a visibility factor in Chat interfaces.
Despite this, data shows it can still influence results in Googleโs AI Overviews/AI Mode.
Weโre not turning this into a product (there are plenty of AI monitoring tools out there already)
But as AI-native search grows, understanding ๐ต๐ผ๐ you show up is just as important as ๐ถ๐ณ you show up.
If your SEO agency is still claiming they โcanโt crawl Shopifyโโฆ itโs not a platform problem. Itโs a ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐บ problem.
Shopify just released a native feature that gives SEO tools secure access to crawl your store, without getting throttled, blocked, or fed bad data.
No more 429 errors. No more โtoo many requests.โ
Just clean, complete audits the way theyโre supposed to be
All it takes is generating an HTTP signature inside Shopify and attaching it to your crawler. Done.
โณ No hacks.
โณ No workarounds.
โณ No excuses.
Signatures can be scoped to a domain, set to expire every 90 days, and labeled clearly for better crawl hygiene โ like โScreaming Frog โ Oct Audit.โ
Itโs a small update with big implications, especially for DTC brands relying on accurate technical SEO audits to drive growth.
Your agency (or freelancer) should already know about this.
And if theyโre still blaming Shopify for audit issues?
That says a lot more about their process than it does about the platform.
โOptimize for AI.โ Thatโs the new advice being pushed by bad marketers.
Weโve been here beforeโฆ
โ First, we optimized for machines with SEO content that ignored humans completely.
โ Then we evolved to finally creating content for real people.
โ Now? Weโre sliding back by prioritizing AI/LLM bots over buyers.
If your content sacrifices brand voice, usability, or clarity for the sake of rankings, youโre not just wasting time... youโre training your audience to ignore you.