@Noah13231481 I have mixed opinions on it as well. Female points of view are obviously important in academic spaces. However, I think that experimental feminism follows gender roles too much. I think the idea itself is good but it just needs a new name #i2e21
@Stephen94382938@JacobSh61423481 I think the fact that she cheated the answer I’d why people think that her answer was so advanced. In my opinion, it was a cop out #i2e21
@JonathanDaity I agree. I think Amy’s decision is important but I think Jake’s decision is just as important. The way my mind works personally is that I would try to talk it out first then if that doesn’t work then I would steal it . #i2e21
@smithjethics In that situation I would think yes. I don’t think your intentions have to do with anyone else’s intentions. As long as you believed that you were doing good, then it is ethical. However, I could be completely wrong #i2e21
@Gracedom3102 I agree however unfortunately a lot of people don’t. In legal senses and in society certain groups of people’s autonomy is always up for debate. #i2e21
@Corbin78763532 I think value is arbitrary. We all value different things. However, I think value actually comes from what we as a society deem as valuable, which is also incredibly arbitrary #i2e21
@crustygobber I didn’t think too much about this so I didn’t apply it to any but you are completely right. It makes me wonder if maybe it is almost too arbitrary nowadays #i2e21
@miiiamor7 Based on the declaration we read it more of a “we will help you get an elementary education but after that you are on your own” for most countries. Legally I think this is how it works but morally I think more should be done. #i2e21
@LowShamya I definitely agree that he had an obligation to to stop the show. From a legal standpoint I think it is gross negligence in both his and the productions part. Even though people signed waivers, the waivers only covered foreseeable things and this was not foreseeable #i2e21
@Noah13231481 I think that this is why I believe that torture is wrong based on almost every ethical theory because there is little to no certainty about the end result #i2e21
@EthicalCole I think it all depends on how you view death itself. Someone people/religions see it as an end, whereas some religions/people see it as a new beginning. If people full heartedly believe that it is a new beginning is it actually doing harm to them? Or is it helping them? #i2e21
@smithjethics I think it is still informed consent because you know only the immediate result. With accepting that, I think most people know they don’t ACTUALLY know what happens after (no matter how religious they are). So when they consent they are also consenting to not knowing. #i2e21
@crustygobber I didn’t think of it like that but now that you say it like that I agree. But I also think that it depends on the scenario and is not black and white. #i2e21
@EthicalCole I think it would be unethical but I don’t think it would be wrong to do so. I think that sometimes we have to be unethical for the greater good #ie21
@school__mouse I agree and disagree. Depending on the person and the emotions they can either lead to a more sound and ethical decision or a more irrational and unethical decision. It just depends on the scenario and the person. #i2e21
@SydneyEthics I find it really hard to judge the ethics of other cultures. I know people would say there is a moral difference between eating dogs and cows but I think that is only because our culture has an emotional attachment to their dogs, so I don’t think it is fair to judge #i2e21