[김승원 가족의 사회적협동조합, 국민 혈세 8억 8천만 원 받아 3억 3천만 원 ‘가족월급잔치’]
- 국회의원 당선 후 본인 지역구로 사무실 이전해 3개월 만에 기관 지정, 오빠 청탁이 통하는 ‘보건복지부’로부터 대규모 예산을 지원받아
- 김승원의 배우자와 두 자녀는 이 조합에 줄줄이 취업, 3억 3천만 원 넘는 급여 챙겨 ‘가족소득조합’으로 변질
좌파 화이트 페미니스트의 위선 그 중심에 서있는 인물이 바로 글로리아 스타이넘이라는 생각이 듦.
클린턴 르윈스키 스캔들로 전세계의 이목이 집중될때 스타이넘은 친히 칼럼을 통해 클린턴을 옹호했고, 이것은 좌파 진영의 안위를 최우선으로 생각한 엘리트 페미 기득권의 오만함을 잘 보여줌.
[페미니즘이 여성인권 운동이라고? 대가리 깨진 애들만 모르는 딥스 인구감축 설계의 전말][자막싱크 수정]
야, 아직도 "페미니즘은 여성 인권 신장 운동입니다~" 이딴 교과서 멘트 믿는 흑우 없제?
진짜 세상 돌아가는 꼴 조금만 깊게 파본 놈들은 다 안다.
페미니즘의 본질은 여성 인권? 애초에 그딴 건 안중에도 없었음.
그 실체는 ‘딥스테이트(글로벌리스트)의 사회공학적 가정 파괴 및 인구감축(Depopulation) 프로젝트’ 그 자체였음.
팩트로만 뼈 때려줄 테니까 정신 똑바로 차리고 봐라.
1. ‘페미의 어머니’ 글로리아 스타이넘, 실체는 CIA 공작원
최근에 92세로 뒈진 2세대 페미니즘의 상징, '글로리아 스타이넘(Gloria Steinem)'.
자칭 깨어있는 언냐들이 신주단지 모시듯 빨아제끼는 그 레전드 페미니스트 맞다.
근데 얘 출신 성분이 뭔지 앎? CIA 요원이었음.
이거 음모론이 아니라 본인 입으로 인정했고 위키피디아, 뉴욕타임스에도 박제된 오피셜 팩트임.
록펠러 재단 돈 처발라가며 CIA 위장 단체(독립연구소) 세워서 활동했던 공작원 출신이다.
딥스들이 왜 막대한 정보기관 예산이랑 홍보 대행사를 뒤에 붙여주면서 스타이넘을 페미니즘의 아이콘으로 띄워줬겠냐?
여성들이 차별받아서 불쌍해서? ㅋㅋㅋㅋ 지나가던 개가 웃는다.
2. 딥스의 진짜 목적: "남녀를 갈라치고 가정을 박살내라"
로마클럽, 폴 에를리히 같은 신세계질서(NWO) 설계자들의 궁극적인 아젠다가 뭐였냐?
바로 '인구 과잉 억제'와 '사회 통제'임.
인구를 줄이고 대중을 가축처럼 통제하려면 가장 먼저 뭘 부숴야 할까?
국가의 최소 단위이자 인간의 마지막 안식처인 ‘전통적인 가정(Family)’임.
남녀를 원수로 만들기:
생물학적으로 자물쇠와 열쇠처럼 결합해야 할 남녀를 '억압자 vs 피해자' 프레임으로 찢어놓음.미디어를 장악해서 드라마, 시트콤마다 아버지의 권위를 바보 병신으로 격하시키고, 남성을 잠재적 가해자로 낙인찍음.
출산과 모성을 저열한 것으로 세뇌:
스타이넘이나 에를리히 같은 딥스 꼭두각시들이 방송 나와서 대놓고 지껄인 소리가 뭔지 아냐?"애 낳는 건 담배 피우는 것만큼 해로운 짓이다", "기저귀 갈 시간에 와인 마시고 공연 보러 가는 게 똑똑한 거다", "대가족은 미디어에서 미개하게 취급해야 한다."
가정의 해체:
여성을 직장으로 몰아내서 세금 걷고, 남녀 갈등 부추겨서 결혼률·출산율을 수직 낙하시키는 구조를 짠 거임.
결과가 어떰?
지금 2026년 대한민국 꼬라지랑 전 세계 출산율 봐라.
인류 역사상 최초로 노인 인구가 유아 인구를 추월했고, 사회는 소멸 직전까지 몰림.
딥스들이 70년대부터 짠 설계도대로 정확히 굴러간 거임.
3. "여성 인권"은 쥐덫 위에 올려둔 치즈였을 뿐
페미들이 지들이 주체적으로 투쟁해서 세상 바꾼 줄 착각하는데, 진짜 코미디가 따로 없음.
너네가 외쳤던 그 모든 구호, 사상, 미디어 담론은 엘리트 미치광이 과학자들과 정보기관이 던져준 모이에 불과함.
사탄주의의 본질이 뭔지 아냐?
스스로를 신의 자리에 올려두고 대중을 바보로 만들어 통제하는 거임.
인도에서 800만 명을 가축처럼 강제 불임 수술시키고, 수돗물에 불임 유도 물질 타자고 지껄이던 놈들이 바로 이 인구통제 딥스 세력들임.
그놈들이 내세운 가장 교묘하고 달콤한 쥐덫의 치즈가 바로 "여성 해방"이라는 가면이었음.
실제로는 여성의 삶이나 행복 따위엔 1도 관심 없었음.
그저 여성이 아이를 낳지 않고, 남성을 혐오하며, 가정을 깨부수게 만드는 '인구 감축용 생물학적 무기'로 써먹었을 뿐임.
세 줄 요약
2세대 페미니즘 간판 글로리아 스타이넘은 록펠러·CIA 자금 지원받던 공작원이었음 (오피셜 팩트).
페미니즘의 진짜 목적은 여성 인권이 아니라, 남녀 갈라치기 + 전통 가정 파괴 + 출산율 조져서 인구 감축하는 딥스 사회공학 프로젝트.
결국 여성 인권 떠들던 언냐들은 딥스들의 '인구 감축용 소모품 장기말'로 낚여서 인생 낭비한 거임 ㅋㅋㅋ
과거 일본 색채가 짖었던 존갈리아노의 디올
현재 중국 색채로 돌아온 존 갈리아노의 자라
오리엔탈리즘은 존 갈리아노 디자인의 원천이겠지만
개인적으로 그에게 가장 잘 어울리는 색채는 자포니즘이라 생각된다.
마지막으로 유대인 비하 논란으로 취소된 27년 멧갈라 회고전은 너무나 아쉽다.
김건희 개 수영장으로 여론을 흔들던 이들이다.
대통령이라는 자는 청와대 엘리베이터를 설치하고,
사실상 부도상태라며 전 경기도 지사였던 김동연을 저격하며 내탓 아님 시전하던 추미애가 관사로 사용하기 위해 12억원대의 아파트 계약을 했다. 그야말로 경기도 재정 알빠노 아닌가
재정 비상 상황을 선언한 추미애 경기지사가 체육대회 예산까지 삭감하면서도 관사로 12억 원대 아파트 전세를 계약한 것으로 알려지면서 직원들의 불만이 나오고 있다.
김동연 전 경기지사는 도 재정 부담을 우려해 자비로 전세 계약을 체결해 사용한 바 있다.
https://t.co/E0mV4Sebgn
지금 돌이켜보면 고 노회찬 의원이 양심과 국민에 대한 면목이 있던 사람이였다는것을 알게된다. 좌파 정치인들의 그 뻔뻔한 면상에서 나오는 평등을 재료로 삼아 정의를 말하며 카르텔로 정치생명 이어나가는거 보고 있으면 너무나 역겹거든. 앞으로 좌파에서 노회찬과 같은 이는 나오지 않을것이다
웬만한 사람이라면 쌍욕 녹음테이프의 공개와 함께 정치생명이 끝났을 것이다. 주변인들이 줄줄이 목숨을 끊고 측근들이 줄줄이 구속됐을 때, 웬만한 사람이라면 양심의 가책을 느끼고 정치인으로서 생존을 포기했을 것이다. [출처:중앙일보] https://t.co/5NsFuvQuR2
On March 30, 1822, when the massacre in Chios began, the Muslim Turks had clear orders. The Sultan had commanded that all Greek Christians be slaughtered, except for boys aged 3-12 and women from 12 to 40. These would be captured and destined for the slave markets.
Young girls were raped publicly in the streets, and newlyweds in front of their husbands, who were then slaughtered. Others were raped in front of their parents, after which the men's genitals were cut off. Women over 40 were set on fire and left to burn alive. Pregnant women had their bellies ripped open and their fetuses pulled out, while small children were thrown forcefully against rocks. The frenzy of the Muslims was unprecedented.
Many Turkish soldiers cut off the heads of Greek Christians and then licked their swords. With this act, they believed they would earn a place in paradise. Others were hanged from the island's trees for deterrence. Severed human limbs and corpses were scattered on the streets, while the sea had turned red from the blood. The smoke from the burning houses had covered all of Chios, while the flames made the night look like day.Several women from Chios preferred death over dishonor and slavery.
They committed suicide by jumping off cliffs. Some were killed while defending their children, siblings, and husbands. Even among those who were captured, some died on hunger strike.Destitute women and children from the island were crammed into ships and transported to the markets of Smyrna and Constantinople, where they were sold as slaves at humiliating prices.
By May 1, 1822, over 41.000 slave ownership documents, known as "teskerés", had been issued in Chios. According to the French-language newspaper of Smyrna, Spectateur Oriental, by May 10, duties had been paid at the Smyrna customs for 40,000 slaves. The priest Welsh from the English embassy in Constantinople recorded what he saw in those days at the city's slave market:
"The Turks treated the women from Chios with utmost contempt. They examined them, groped them like butchers do lambs, and bought them for 100 grosia to 3 pounds per head. About 500 women from Chios were sold in the fish market."
The tragic events of Chios shocked Europe and America. For many weeks, the European press reported daily information and descriptions about the fate of the inhabitants, the massacres, the plunder, and the sale of women and children in the slave markets.
Korais writes in a letter to Varvakis:
"Imagine that you see Christ on the Cross, drenched in His blood, and calling out to you these paternal words: My son Varvakis, many thousands of captives baptized in my name are in danger at this hour of renouncing me and embracing the abominable religion of Mohammed. Behold the time, baptized in my name, beloved son, to save your baptized brothers from the Turkish defilement."
The horrific images of the crimes of the Muslims against the Greek Christians were never erased from the collective memory of Europeans. Great European artists were so shocked by the descriptions that they created important works inspired by Chios.
The famous painting by Delacroix is exhibited to this day in a prominent position at the Louvre. Victor Hugo's poem titled "The Greek Child" is a moving record. But the most famous sculpture of 19th-century America also stands out, named: the "Greek Slave." The sculptor Hiram Powers began carving it about twenty years after the tragic events. The statue depicts a young woman, nude, bound with chains. In one hand, she holds a small cross on a chain.
Powers himself describes the subject of his work as follows:
"The Slave has been abducted by the Turks from one of the Greek Islands during the Greek Revolution, the history of which is known to all. Her father and mother, and perhaps all her relatives, have been exterminated by her enemies, and she alone was kept alive, as a treasure that could not be thrown away. Now she is among barbarian strangers, under the pressure of the full recollection of the catastrophic events that led her to this state. She stands exposed to the gaze of people she abhors, and awaits her fate with intense anxiety, which is mitigated by her trust in the goodness of God. Gather all these sufferings together, and add to them the strength and resignation of a Christian, and there is no room left for shame."
As a Greek, I will use my weapon, the knowledge of my history, to warn as many as I can about the violent and barbaric invasion of Islam and the war we are experiencing today.
You might wonder why I repost the same stories once in a while. Repetition is the mother of learning. The only reason I have X is to educate people about Greek history. My purpose is to keep barbarians away.
- Homer Pavlos
One of the left’s most destructive ideas is that private property creates conflict between us and that if we simply got rid of it we would all just get along.
It all started with Jean-Jacques Rousseau. He believed that man is born good and free but is everywhere corrupted by society - especially by private property. In his Discourse on the Origin of Inequality (1755) he painted the “noble savage” as a gentle, self-sufficient being living in harmonious nature, untroubled by greed or envy. The fall from grace, Rousseau claimed, began the moment someone fenced off a piece of land and declared “This is mine”.
This romantic vision became the emotional foundation for much of modern collectivism. Karl Marx shared the optimistic view of human nature, arguing that ending capitalism would liberate man from alienation, allowing people to stop seeing themselves as competitive individuals and instead live as part of a harmonious collective. If private ownership corrupts naturally good human beings, then abolishing or severely restricting it must restore virtue and equality.
But Rousseau’s noble savage is a dangerous fantasy. Human beings are not born as inherently good; they are born with the capacity for both cooperation and conflict. And private property does not corrupt; it civilises: it turns potential rivals into trading partners, creates incentives for long-term planning and makes peaceful cooperation on a vast scale possible.
The historical record is clear: wherever private property has been protected, living standards, innovation and individual freedom have soared. Wherever it has been attacked in the name of equality, poverty and tyranny have followed. The clearer we see through Rousseau’s romantic delusion, the stronger the case becomes for defending individual rights and private property as the true foundations of a civilised society.
Karl Marx was wrong about everything, from his determinist view of history and understanding of human nature to his flawed theory of value and lack of understanding of how an economy works. His legacy is simply one of having inspired death and misery.
Historical materialism is deterministic and reductionist pseudo-science, treating the idea of an economic "base" (forces and relations of production) as the primary driver of history and all but ignoring all other factor - most obviously individual agency.
Marx saw human nature as defined by social relations and malleable, having been changed by capitalism, because communal activity, in particular through labour, is what distinguishes humans from animals. We have been alienated from our "species-being" by capitalism but socialism can return us to our true selves. He totally underestimated innate, universal human traits like self-interest, greed, ambition, competition and the desire for power.
His labour theory of value is empirically and theoretically flawed. Value is in fact subjective and determined by marginal utility, scarcity, demand, and consumer preferences, rather than by "socially necessary labour time". Austrian economists like Böhm-Bawerk argued this decisively in the late 19th century, showing why prices diverge from labour inputs.
His economic theory totally misses the coordinating role of prices (as show by Mises' economic calculation problem), markets and incentives in allocating resources efficiently. The exploitation theory (surplus value extracted from labour) overlooks voluntary exchange, mutual benefit in wage labour, and how workers' living standards rose dramatically under capitalism through productivity gains.
Karl Marx's theories and his call for proletarian revolution to overthrow capitalism profoundly inspired 20th-century revolutionaries. Figures like Lenin, Stalin, Mao Zedong, and Pol Pot adapted and radicalised his ideas into doctrines justifying violent seizure of power, centralised control and suppression of "class enemies" to build socialism. These regimes resulted in catastrophic human suffering. Estimates of deaths from executions, forced famines (Holodomor, Great Leap Forward), purges, gulags, and genocides range from 65–100 million or more across communist states. Millions were killed directly or died from engineered starvation and repression and generations were immiserated and trapped in authoritarian misery for decades. While Marx envisioned liberation, his ideas in fact enabled totalitarian horrors that devastated vast swathes of the world.
Communism is jewish
There would be no communism in China without the jews. 85 to 90% of the foreigners helping the Chinese at the time of the Communist takeover were jewish.
There was an amazing thread on X regarding how the jews contributed to the fruition of Communist China. That account has since been closed, but luckily, I had copied the whole thread and posted it on another site at the link below if anyone wants to read it over.
El Greco riunisce #SanFrancesco e #SanGiovanni in uno spazio senza profondità, sotto un cielo plumbeo.
Due figure allungate, due mondi spirituali che non si scontrano: dialogano tra devozione e teologia mistica.
(1600, #Uffizi)
A single Hebrew letter became part of a Christian theory about who Jesus was.
YHWH is the four-letter divine name in the Hebrew Bible. Add the Hebrew letter Shin and you get YHShWH, a five-letter form known as the Pentagrammaton and later connected with Jesus. The idea is older than Renaissance Kabbalah. The 4th-century writer Evagrius already used a form of this five-letter name for Jesus. Johannes Reuchlin developed the idea further in his 1494 work De Verbo Mirifico.
For Reuchlin, this was not a spelling change. YHWH belonged to the revelation given through Moses. YHShWH belonged to the age of Christ. The divine name was being understood through the incarnation, with Jesus revealing what had previously been hidden. This became a distinctly Christian reading of Kabbalah. Later traditions connected the five letters with Christ, the human being, the elements and the cosmos.
That also puts “Yahshuah” in context. Yeshua is an ancient Jewish name associated with Jesus. YHShWH is a later theological construction based on a Christian interpretation of YHWH. One added letter became part of a much larger claim about Christ, revelation and the name of God.
Image source:
“A Rosicrucian Crucifixion” (1928), J. Augustus Knapp.
Source: Wikimedia Commons.
Version checked: 4 September 2018. License checked: 3 September 2026 - Public Domain.
“Boehme-heart” (1730), associated with Jakob Böhme.
Source: Wikimedia Commons.
Version checked: 31 October 2012.
License checked: 3 September 2026 - Public Domain.
10 PREGUNTAS QUE LOS MARXISTAS SIEMPRE ESQUIVAN
Si todos somos propietarios de los medios de producción, ¿puedo vender mi parte o necesito permiso del colectivo?
Y si todos son dueños, ¿quién es responsable cuando algo sale mal?
Si el Capitalismo explota al trabajador, ¿por qué tantos trabajadores voluntariamente escapan de países socialistas a capitalistas?
Si el problema es que algunos tienen demasiado poder económico, ¿por qué sería buena idea concentrar todavía más poder en una sola institución política?
Si una sociedad comunista es tan superior, ¿por qué necesita prohibir que sus ciudadanos abandonen el sistema?
Si todos poseen una fábrica, ¿quién decide qué hacer con ella cuando todos quieren utilizarla de maneras distintas?
Si la riqueza de uno necesariamente empobrece a otro, ¿cómo explicas que una sociedad entera pueda enriquecerse simultáneamente?
Si el capitalista es un parásito, ¿por qué arriesga su propio patrimonio cuando nadie sabe si el negocio funcionará?
Si dos personas intercambian voluntariamente y ambas aceptan el trato, ¿quién fue explotado?
Si la desigualdad es el problema, ¿por qué una sociedad donde todos son pobres sería preferible a otra donde todos son ricos pero algunos son muchísimo más ricos?