@Andrew_Akbashev Perhaps, it is not the peer-review process but first-authored and total number of publications as a measure of academic success resulting in unmanageable amounts and somewhat repetitive submitted manuscripts. We all need them but is it the best system?
Our new paper “Clarifying the evidence for microbial- and plant-derived soil organic matter, and the path toward a more quantitative understanding” is out now in GCB! w/ @sgrandysoil@NoahSokol @JessErnakovich @KeiluweitLab Rich Smith & @seritafrey
https://t.co/3bVykfVhCb
There may be a time and place for soil transfers in restoration, but this was not it. Soil transfers from intact to disturbed boreal forests neither alter ectomycorrhizal fungal communities nor improve pine seedling performance @jeanhongo https://t.co/DkDvjPpC9p
@LaPremisaEli Igualmente se ha denunciado en innumerable ocasiones ese tipo de contaminación. Creo que en vez de atacar a quienes al menos denuncian y tratan de tomar acción, debemos exigir a quienes tienen autoridad en el asunto a tomar acción en vez de enviar la fuerza policiaca.
@LaPremisaEli Si representa un ~7.5% de la población, como país tendría 254 millones mas habitantes que EEUU. Por qué te sorprende que el tercer país más poblado fuese la cuarta economía más grande? Suena algo homofóbico cuando no lo pones en perspectiva.
@DoesTheScience@AcademicChatter@OpenAcademics I recommend it! You get to review papers from higher impact factor journals that would not typically ask students to review. As other people pointed out, ensure your PI let the journal know!
Root fungi on old trees (~400 yo) differ from young trees (~100 yo)--> 1) conserve ancient trees, 2) old trees may be functionally isolated from younger trees wrt ecto networks https://t.co/VZlHP8fEht