Ultra Yippie Ki Yay

Rabid conservative, with a random fairness itch that needs to be dealt with every now and then. Because I HATE the term "fair share".

[Ultra Yippie Ki Yay @jelambert9]

@tedcruz @EWErickson https://t.co/UCDKMNpyMi
https://t.co/1FHrCO2csE
@RepAdamSchiff:
Had Moussoui's laptop. 9/11 was imminent, but we did nothing..
James Woods told FBI about a trial run on a plane. It was imminent, but we did nothing.
CIA suspected, we did nothing.

And it changed the world.

[Ultra Yippie Ki Yay @jelambert9]

@Dolphin4735 @RepNancyMace AYFKM? Read up on the Barbary Pirates and Thomas Jefferson.

[Ultra Yippie Ki Yay @jelambert9]

@realMaalouf About damn time!

[Ultra Yippie Ki Yay @jelambert9]

@VP @POTUS @SecRubio @DHSgov @SenMullin

[Roger Severino @RogerSeverino_]

Dear @VP @JDVance, I was honored to see you endorse my idea of prohibiting birth tourism citizenship in U.S. Territories (which China has exploited to the hilt), and I'd like to offer you some even bolder ideas to save our national sovereignty.

So far, solutions to the Anchor Baby problem have focused on the "anchors," but the SCOTUS decision requires renewing focus on the "boats" they tether and ending their incentives to give birth here. Here’s how.

Take all the conditions in the original Trump EO and direct all the consequences onto foreigners who exploit "loophole citizenship" by declaring them PERSONA NON GRATA.

Specifically, if an alien without legal permanent residency chooses to have a child on U.S. soil, the foreigner parents must either renounce the child’s American citizenship or lose the ability to ever again legally step foot in the U.S., their choice.

Under the Immigration and Nationality Act (8 U.S.C. § 1182(f)), the President has broad power to suspend or restrict entry of any class of foreign nationals the President determines would be “detrimental to the interests of the United States.” The President should use this authority to deem such foreigners:

1) permanently ineligible for U.S. entry under any visa type (whether visitor, student, work, or otherwise)

2) permanently ineligible to petition for asylum, refugee, or temporary protected status

3) permanently ineligible for lottery or family based entry

4) permanently ineligible to petition for any legal residency or U.S. citizenship whatsover, including by future marriage to an American citizen.

Foreigners cynically use their children as tools to get lawful access to the U.S., its resources, and its opportunities that were paid for in blood and treasure by generations of Americans that came before. Forever shut the door to that access and birth tourism would plummet overnight.

But what about the people who would defy any ban or are already here illegally? That’s a tougher problem, but still addressable. The lawbreakers would have know that if they exploit “loophole citizenship” and choose not to renounce their child’s U.S. citizenship, they will have automatically moved themselves up on the deportation tracking and priority list.

The president can also exercise his discretion under the INA to strip away common procedural tools immigration lawyers use to delay or withhold removal and can require expedited deportation once they are caught as we currently do with repeat offenders and criminals.

Congress, for its part, should codify these changes to prevent any potential future open borders President from unilaterally undoing them. It may also need to create mechanisms for a parent covered by the EO to be able to renounce their child's American citizenship as an exercise of their parental rights, especially in cases of truly accidental births on U.S. soil.

States too have a role to play in limiting perverse incentives. For example, they can require parents who are here illegally to pay for the public schooling of their children, whether U.S. citizen or not (and thereby prompt the court to revisit the wrongly decided Plyler v. Doe decision of 1982).

People are furious because the biggest court rewrite of the Constitution since Obergefell has placed our national identity at the mercy of foreigners making decisions according to THEIR interests, on THEIR timing, and on THEIR terms.

In the American system of government, for every egregious SCOTUS decision, there should be an equal and opposite reaction from the other federal branches, the states, and the People. It’s how our system is designed, and we should exercise that power to make sure it is Americans, and only Americans, who decide who can join our great nation.

[Ultra Yippie Ki Yay @jelambert9]

@michaelxpettis @ChinaAcademyORG After seeing what China did during COVID, hoarding everything from shipping containers to Covid masks, (not to mention spreading covid across the world) we would be insane to bow to their wishes.

[Ultra Yippie Ki Yay @jelambert9]

@OwenGregorian Got to be gaslighting here. Every single exchange I’ve had with AI chat bots on this subject, the chat bot reinforces the “safe and effective “ message.

[Ultra Yippie Ki Yay @jelambert9]

@Beno10_MFC 9

[Ultra Yippie Ki Yay @jelambert9]

@realMaalouf Delusional assholes like this are a canker sore on society. Why do we tolerate it

[Ultra Yippie Ki Yay @jelambert9]

@atensnut Vlad had the right idea

[Ultra Yippie Ki Yay @jelambert9]

@DefiantLs Here’s where @DOGE and @RepJamesComer come in. Who is coaching the Somali and Haitian scammers on how to beat the system. There’s got to be a trail

[Ultra Yippie Ki Yay @jelambert9]

@TheMercianNews

[Ultra Yippie Ki Yay @jelambert9]

@linadreaamy 205

[Ultra Yippie Ki Yay @jelambert9]

@MichaelARothman @EricLDaugh Politicians have only two loyalties. Power and Money.
Thune has power.
He looks bad here.
Must be 💰

[Ultra Yippie Ki Yay @jelambert9]

@One_Way_Home @CreasonJana To quote Keanu in The Replacements.

“That’s why girls don’t play the game”

[Sharyl Attkisson 🕵️‍♂️💼🥋 @SharylAttkisson]

When the dermatologist was just on Fox News debunking the idea that some chemicals in sunscreen aren't good for us, it sounded illogically dismissive of the studies and research.

I took a quick look.

I didn’t hear her disclose her paid relationships with big sunscreen makers. ☀️

This is part of a trend that I discovered decades ago. It permeates our news media landscape.

I learned that nearly every member of the national board of experts that lowered cholesterol guidelines and basically recommended that people should take more statins, worked for the statin makers.

I learned that many members of the board set up during Covid that restricted hydroxychloroquine... were paid by the companies that made other controversial treatments for Covid like remdesivir that were then prioritized over hydroxychloroquine.

It doesn’t stop there.

When the government and the cosmetics industry tried to falsely debunk the scientific studies linking antiperspirants and breast cancer, they referred me to the American Cancer Society for an interview. I learned that the expert at the American Cancer Society hadn’t even read the relevant studies, and yet was claiming the link was a myth. I asked and found out that the American Cancer Society takes money from the antiperspirant industry and other allegedly cancer, causing industries. However, they wouldn’t tell me how much.

When the nonprofit “every child by" was illogically denying the proven vaccine autism link, I dug in and found out the nonprofit was actually started by a vaccine maker in order to defend vaccine companies, and to controversialist those of us exposing the risks.

I was the first journalist to ask and report that the expert the government kept referring us to in order to debunk the vaccine autism link, Dr. Paul Offit, was not an independent expert at all, but was a vaccine inventor and vaccine industry insider… though that was never disclosed in the media at the time. He was always presented falsely as if he were an independent expert.

When I saw a lead dietary group giving questionable advice about nutrition, I learned that the group takes money from the sugar, cola, fast food, and preservative snack industry.

In short, whenever I’ve looked for a tie between experts defending a chemical or risk that could impact an industry's bottom line... I’ve always found one. Food for thought.

"Dr. Jody Levine has financial and professional relationships with several prominent consumer product companies that manufacture and market sunscreens.
Because sunscreen is legally regulated as an over-the-counter drug and is a core component of commercial skincare lines, her consulting roles inherently create potential conflicts of interest when she recommends sun protection or reviews skincare products in the media. 

Her specific ties to major corporate sunscreen manufacturers include:

1. Johnson & Johnson / Kenvue

Dr. Levine has served on the Medical Advisory Board for Johnson & Johnson. Johnson & Johnson’s consumer health spin-off, Kenvue, owns Neutrogena and Aveeno, two of the largest and most widely distributed sunscreen brands in the United States. In her media and print features, she has regularly recommended product categories or specific options overlapping with these brands, such as recommending Neutrogena Sport Face in broad consumer media interviews. 

2. Galderma (Cetaphil)

She has acted as a consultant and advisor for Cetaphil, a brand owned by Galderma. Cetaphil produces a substantial line of daily facial moisturizers with SPF, mineral sunscreens, and broad-spectrum sun protection lotions marketed heavily toward sensitive skin and pediatric care. 

3. Beiersdorf (Eucerin)

Dr. Levine has maintained consulting arrangements with Eucerin, a brand under the Beiersdorf corporate umbrella. Eucerin manufactures a wide range of daily anti-aging lotions with SPF, sensitive skin sunscreens, and body sun protection products. 

Impact on Media Appearances

When Dr. Levine appears on networks like Fox News or in print publications to deliver general public health messages—such as advising viewers to apply sunscreen 15 minutes before going outside or warning against the dangers of tanning beds—she is providing standard medical advice aligned with the American Academy of Dermatology. However, because she does not routinely issue on-screen financial disclosures listing her corporate partners during short news segments, viewers are generally unaware that she is paid by the parent companies of the very products sitting on drugstore shelves."

[Ultra Yippie Ki Yay @jelambert9]

@CBS @CBSNews @NBCNews @ABC @msnowevents @CNN @cnnbrk @WSJ @nytimes @latimes @foxnewspolitics @RFKJRpodcast @MSNBC

[Liz Churchill @liz_churchill10]

These 6 major Media Outlets have refused to report on DNI Tulsi Gabbard’s declassification that proves Dr. Fauci’s cover-up of the ‘Covid Pandemic’

[Ultra Yippie Ki Yay @jelambert9]

@Rothmus Who is she? And what was the response?

[Ultra Yippie Ki Yay @jelambert9]

@P_McCulloughMD Sad thing is I’ve expected this kind of behavior from govt, while still hoping for the best.

But the closing of businesses, schools, mandated masks and ruining the careers of Doctors and journalists who tried to do something was another level entirely and opened eyes

[Peter A. McCullough, MD, MPH® @P_McCulloughMD]

Purpose of Creating Dangerous Coronaviruses was Genetic Vaccine Development for Global Consumption

Government-funded gain-of-function research that accidentally or deliberately unleashed a virus, then officials covered their tracks--all for the purpose of genetic vaccines to forced on the entire world. Liz MacDonald with Dr Peter McCullough discuss this chilling revelation on The Evening Edit, Fox Business @LizMacDonaldFOX @FoxBusiness @EveningEdit @McCulloughFund

[Ultra Yippie Ki Yay @jelambert9]

@AndrewZywiecMD Respect.

My own primary care Dr of 20 years was afraid to buck the system during COVID. Telehealth only. No recommendations other than “go the ER if it gets worse.

A year later, he admitted to me the state HC had threatened anyone swimming against the current.

[Ultra Yippie Ki Yay @jelambert9]

@FUDHelpdesk @SharylAttkisson We can debate and disagree on that subject. But
A. Farming it out to China?
B. Lying to the people about it and punishing them for violating the rules, when even they didn’t believe in. (Ex: French Laundry)
C. Lying to congress about it.

Unforgivable