John Estep

I like dogs, books, and shutting the f**k up & sitting still for long periods at a time.

[John Estep @jestep27]

controversial take: most people are hot

[John Estep @jestep27]

@BrandonStraka @denise3kids7 Wow. I gotta say, as someone who desperately wants to believe in respectful debate/disagreement, perusing through this comment section is…not encouraging lol.

Who knows how much of it is bot armies though, you know? Keep doing what you’re doing brother.

[John Estep @jestep27]

@BrandonStraka I love seeing examples of calm, collected, respectful disagreement like this.

I see Straka’s point, but if everyone spoke about the case like this there’d be no need to fear discrediting if they turn out to be wrong. It’s okay to be wrong if you’re authentic/graceful about it.

[John Estep @jestep27]

Great example of respectful disagreement.

[Brandon Straka #WalkAway @BrandonStraka]

Who killed Charlie Kirk?

I asked Marjorie Taylor Greene who she believes is responsible—and why she’s skeptical of the official narrative.

I’ve stayed out of this conversation until now out of respect for the investigation. But in this clip, I explain why I’m concerned that many of the people pushing alternative theories may ultimately end up discrediting themselves.

The Charlie Kirk case is becoming another fault line in the growing divide on the right. Much of MAGA has accepted the official narrative, while many in the America First movement are convinced they’re being lied to.

Marjorie and I dig into all of it. @mtgreenee @FmrRepMTG

Watch the clip. Link in the comments.

[John Estep @jestep27]

@JodyChaseTN Getting a little closer. I hope it happens.

[John Estep @jestep27]

@Stoodoutweft Agreed, I guess in this context by “taboo” I mean anything politically charged that you happen to be interested in

Once algo clocks your interest, it feeds you examples of people fighting about it, giving the false impression that if YOU bring it up you’ll get fought too

[John Estep @jestep27]

@Stoodoutweft Online algos feed us ppl fighting about taboo issues so we think the “taboo” is realer than it really is and we avoid talking about them in our regular life.

When, in reality, nobody gives a shit and most people are happy to talk about any topic so long as it’s interesting

[John Estep @jestep27]

@LexiDph12 @jakerattlesnk @paleochristcon DM me, we can figure out a time.

[John Estep @jestep27]

@LexiDph12 @SeanSemanko I’m sorry I just want to understand—so you’re saying you think even if those conditions were met, that she wouldn’t do it? Why do you think that?

[John Estep @jestep27]

@LexiDph12 @jakerattlesnk @paleochristcon I could do it if you want. Although I wouldn’t refer to myself as a “Candace follower” so I’m prob not what you’re looking for

I have some qualms about her. But I do question the mainstream narrative, support her right to investigate, and don’t understand why more ppl don’t.

[John Estep @jestep27]

@Rach4Patriarchy @jakerattlesnk @paleochristcon He can throw a few Zyns in, he’ll be fine.

Is that seriously the point you have an issue with?

[John Estep @jestep27]

@LexiDph12 @jakerattlesnk @paleochristcon Do it. The more pressure on all parties involved, the better. These debates need to happen, and they need to happen in public. The intra-echo-chamber discourse is getting us nowhere. These competing ideas need to come face to face with one another, and we all need to see it

[John Estep @jestep27]

@jakerattlesnk @paleochristcon Please God let this happen.

We can sit here and argue in our respective echo chambers about “which side is demonic” all we want, but until these people start having substantive conversations face to face, none of it matters.

[John Estep @jestep27]

@SeanSemanko Please God let this happen.

We can sit here and argue in our respective echo chambers about “which side is demonic” all we want, but until these people start having substantive conversations face to face, none of it matters.

[John Estep @jestep27]

I pray to God this debate happens.

We can sit here and argue in our respective echo chambers about “which side is demonic” all we want, but until these people start having substantive conversations face to face, none of it matters.

[Sean Semanko @SeanSemanko]

Candace just gave a counter-offer to debate Andrew Wilson on the Charlie Kirk conspiracies:

- $500,000
- If in-person, Andrew has to travel to Candace
- Livestreamed
- No smoking
- Blake Neff, Andrew Kolvet, or Erika Kirk must say Andrew is debating on TPUSA's behalf

[John Estep @jestep27]

@LexiDph12 @SeanSemanko Think he’ll do it? If not, why?

[Bryce Greene @TheGreeneBJ]

Holy shit... Wired reports that back in May, the U.S. Military was testing an experimental GPS jammer and and caused a civilian plane to crash into the side of a mountain, killing everyone on board.

[John Estep @jestep27]

@BlakeSNeff You’re either not very intelligent or not very honest. Prob both. [source: the same article Blake linked]

[John Estep @jestep27]

@ArtifexMemor @BlakeSNeff Funny, here’s the source Blake cited literally undercutting his own point: