🚨 Rupert LOWE has taken to social media to post an alarming 😳 announcement. He stated…
“Some view Restore Britain's policies on immigration as too harsh. Let me put this simply - if hundreds of thousands of low-skilled migrants are allowed citizenship? THEY CAN VOTE. We will lose our country forever. We will never get it back. It must NOT be allowed to happen”.
Is he right OR is he being over the top and too dramatic? 🤔
Source: Facebook
A Restore Britain Government will run a fast-track recruitment campaign to bring thousands of British veterans into immigration enforcement roles - field roles.
Using their unique skills to detain and then deport the illegal migrant population.
Following today’s announcement of new legal refugee routes, I’ve never been more convinced that a large number of people ‘working’ in the Home Office need to go to prison.
I have always respected Tommy Robinson for his work on the rape gangs - he gave evidence to our inquiry, and it was remarkable to hear his level of knowledge. It contributed massively to our findings.
Tommy was fair and balanced. I learnt a lot.
He has not been treated fairly by our establishment for many years, and today is the latest example of that.
To be honest, I believe it is a disgrace.
He was right on the rape gangs. The state was wrong.
They want to vilify him for that.
The media, the justice system, Labour, the Tories, Farage. It was made very clear to me when I was in Reform that I was not to praise Tommy Robinson publicly. I did regardless.
The entire establishment is against him.
My view is this - he has done more than any politician to uncover the rape gangs, and for that I thank him.
Restore Britain has published our new policy to construct detention facilities capable of securely detaining every single illegal arrival.
Outlining a detailed step-by-step plan to keep these third world invaders off our streets, ready for deportation.
https://t.co/DBHDCVEgUM
“Take them out of hotels, take them away, put them on boats and send them back! They don't have to be here!” Tommy Robinson doesn't want fake asylum seekers in UK. Do you agree with him?
The man accused of murdering Ann Widdecombe has been charged with preparing terrorist acts, including against Nigel Farage.
Joshua Kerry, 28, of Rotherham, South Yorkshire, was charged today with one count of preparation of terrorist acts.
The charge relates to alleged activity between 31 May 2024 and 8 July 2026.
Instead of looking into these degenerate leftist freaks, they're harassing normal people worried about our country and labelling them "far right".
@GBNEWS What ‘stitch-up’ is that? A national party standing in four local by-elections in one day?
If you’re going to insult me, it would be polite to allow me on the channel to defend myself.
Don’t you think?
⚠️
A whistblower who works as a border control officer at Manchester Airport has come forward.
He says there is a private terminal being used to fly in migrants.
"We patrol to check nothing is untoward. There is an area we can see - but are formally prevented from entering or inspecting.
Regular flights arrive there - 3 or 4 times every week. Transponders are switched off, yet they are given clearance to land using a special call sign.
Passengers are not screened by us - they are processed directly by Home Office personnel. They board unmarked buses. Each flight carries 200 - 300 people.
These flights arrive from the Middle East and sub‑Saharan Africa. They land between 2:00 am and 4:00 am. Government gives clearance. Unmarked buses collect passengers and leave through a hidden exit gate onto restricted roads - then merge onto motorways and vanish".
Full interview:
https://t.co/O5XAqC8gw6
I read the ‘one in, one out’ policy has been scrapped on illegal migrants.
Let’s hope it’s replaced with our Restore Britain version.
‘None in, two million (at least) out.’
It’s cleaner.
🚨 “I’m going to bomb the plane, Death to America, Death to Trump - Allahu Akbar”
Recorded earlier today aboard a Domestic internal flight EasyJet over The UK
Legacy Media aren’t showing you this ‼️
I spent over two decades in counterterrorism and I’m still involved in many ways, so here are my views on what I see has happened over the past 24-36 hours in the UK:
Five British men in their twenties were arrested on Sunday near RAF Fairford on suspicion of explosives offences and the preparation of a terrorist act. On Monday they were released on police bail.
That’s not what the terrorism clock looks like when the investigators are still in charge of it.
Under ordinary UK criminal law a suspect can be held for 24 hours, stretched to 36 by a superintendent, and to 96 hours by a magistrate.
But under section 41 of the Terrorism Act the first hold is 48 hours, not 24 hours. A judge can then extend it, in stages, up to 14 days without a charge. If the case merits it, it can even be pushed to 28 days. That 14-day cap exists for exactly this kind of file of vans, an airbase the United States uses, a possible foreign hand, explosives (if there were any) and interviews that are not finished on the first night.
Counter-terrorism police said the inquiry isn’t over. They said conditions apply. They said a state link has not been ruled out. Those sentences he said only make sense if the evidence trail was still live. A live trail is why Parliament built the two-week window.
But watching the guy read out the statement showed me in his body language, tone and eye movements that releasing those five men was NOT his or his department’s decision.
Walking five men after roughly a day is what you do with a pub fight, not with a suspected terrorist attack on a bomber base.
I’ve sat in enough interrogation rooms to know the difference between a custody clock and a political ceiling. Nobody had to shout an order down a phone. Someone in the political building above the investigators decided that charging British nationals on Monday, with Iran already denying it, Washington watching the runway, and a Labour conference where the main topics of discussion were prioritizing Palestinian and other refugees settling in the UK, was uglier than bail and a holding statement.
The law allowed them to keep the door shut. Yet the door opened anyway in half of the most minimum time.
That’s the story. That for me is the only story here. Not “they were innocent.” Not “the case collapsed.” The statute was not exhausted, but the appetite was.
The real question is who, and most importantly, why?