Joe Nuts

erm

[Joe Nuts @jntz00]

@BorisBartlog @julianboolean_ It literally is in the example. That’s why it’s 19 more instead of 20 more

[Joe Nuts @jntz00]

@Gladvillain @mhmiranusa decent meme but jassm is a low observable cruise missile

[Joe Nuts @jntz00]

@The_Nicepackage @atrupar It should be noted that “borrow spend die” is much rarer than most people seem to think, but even so I don’t really oppose this.

[Joe Nuts @jntz00]

@doobry @gossipguru4u @sentdefender @prestonstew_ It’s a robot farming engagement money

[Joe Nuts @jntz00]

@SBF_FTX @realDonaldTrump How much would your Anthropic investment be up?

[Joe Nuts @jntz00]

@dani43321 @michal_smyk @LinkofSunshine I’m pretty sure it is exactly 50% with false negatives: 10000 people, 100 have it 99TP 1FN, 9900 don’t have it 9801TN 99FP. 99TP/198 total positives = .5

[Joe Nuts @jntz00]

@flaminhottweets @JeremiahDJohns @mattparlmer Even if there are today, there won’t be in the near future

[Joe Nuts @jntz00]

@krissakray the correct comparison here is with a risk free asset like T bills, since prepaying your mortgage is a risk free return

[Joe Nuts @jntz00]

@krissakray If I can Invest at 4% or prepay a mortgage at 2%, every dollar I prepay “earns” me 2% when it could’ve been earning 4. It’s simple arbitrage

[Joe Nuts @jntz00]

@TimTrytitle @Marstucky @CsizmaziaDalma @atlanticesque @LinkofSunshine Wrong

[Joe Nuts @jntz00]

@TimPaulino @theficouple you missed the most important one which is: what’s your marginal tax rate (mortgage interest is deductible)

[Joe Nuts @jntz00]

@theficouple correct answer is: depends on my marginal tax rate

[Joe Nuts @jntz00]

@CoKeynesian see this is funny because we are going to do the opposite of this (inflation benefits who in an economy again?)

[Joe Nuts @jntz00]

@MorePerfectUS “why are they not using spoons”

[Joe Nuts @jntz00]

@Firstname12224 @FreeMarketDog @TheAlphaThought dude you’re retarded

[Joe Nuts @jntz00]

@Sn33d88 @BradCGZ @historyinmemes technically this one is fine but he failed at least 2 others

[Joe Nuts @jntz00]

@dccommonsense The hard part is preventing allies from developing nukes - think Japan or South Korea. If we assume there’s almost no chance of denuclearization, you have to consider the vast number of possibilities 100 or 200 years from now. Anything could realistically happen over that time

[Joe Nuts @jntz00]

@dccommonsense 1) thankfully the limitations are mostly physical (enriching uranium is hard and takes a while) so it’s not becoming dramatically easier over time for now
2) yeah I guess your solution would probably be to violently supress anyone attempting to build them forever

[Joe Nuts @jntz00]

@principal_idele @IterIntellectus @MZHemingway I’ve been saying this for a while and this is the first time I’ve seen someone else say it too. Kids were historically an expense in the short term but necessary in the long term. We’ve taken the “upside” (removed the downside of not having them) and left only the expenses

[Joe Nuts @jntz00]

@hirokonn_ARAK @arowe777 @HLC_actual I’m not a huge WW2 history buff but the zero is highly regarded by lay people (specifically early in the war, in 1941 and 1942). I don’t know if that reputation is deserved. I also had never heard that we captured one.