John Custer

[Ethical Skeptic ☀ @EthicalSkeptic]

If you want to know why 83% of truly ancient megaliths point to one spot on the planet - obtain the book...

If you want to know why mankind forgot this and was forbidden to know it, and what that means - obtain the book...

Be forewarned, you will never be the same person again.

https://t.co/3J6i4jdwSi

[HashingZap ✝️ @HashZappa]

The final simulation of Ben Davidson's model at 0.05° with 5.5M cube cells globally. I think I've hammered out the 'under the hood' physics as much as possible. I'll also have an article later today simulating Zacharias' pole location at the same zoom.

I'm moving into building out 0.01° with 138M cube cells globally now, though. That will be my final addition. Additionally, I will try to integrate the results into a user-interactive tool for max fun. Each simulation at that zoom level will take days though, so it will be a slow going process. 🫡

[SpaceWeatherNews @SunWeatherMan]

SUPERFLOOD https://t.co/O3rWVKEYS7 via @YouTube

[SpaceWeatherNews @SunWeatherMan]

Holy shit.

Just stop what you are doing right now.

Make sure to scroll.

[SpaceWeatherNews @SunWeatherMan]

Earthquake Watch, Solar Storm Coming, Ice Problem | S0 News May.12.2026 https://t.co/odfKroqDEN via @YouTube

[DK🇺🇸🦅🇺🇸 @1Nicdar]

Imagine that.

[The Babylon Bee @TheBabylonBee]

NASA Plays Incredible April Fools' Joke Of Once Again Pretending To Go To The Moon https://t.co/iJraHxbCVA

[Chad Harrison 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 @Texas_jeep_guy]

Now that’s a huge hidden bunker. If I win the lottery that’s what I want.

[Code Geek @codek_tv]

Sin & Cosin

[Ifeoma C. N @__iffff]

A house that stretches into the landscape instead of sitting on it feels like a very deliberate way to live.

[Craig Stone @nobulart]

A Coupled System. Over the past few days I’ve been approaching the GEOMAGIA dataset from a number of angles to see what survives repeated, adversarial ways of looking at it. Different representations, different statistics, different nulls. What keeps re-emerging is that during major geomagnetic excursions, the field does not wander randomly.. it collapses onto Earth-fixed planes, repeatedly, across independent events, records, and methods. What followed from this turned out to be even more interesting. Once the evidence of geometry is real, questions of coupling, inertiia, and surface response can be addressed.

What questions were asked, and what did we actually learn? This work did not begin with a single grand theory. It unfolded as a sequence of increasingly specific questions, each prompted by what the data would and would not allow us to dismiss. Below, each paper is described in the order it was written, in terms of the question it asked and the answer the data returned.

[1] Earth-Fixed Rotation Planes of Geomagnetic Excursions and a Two-Mode Interpretation of Core–Mantle Decoupling
Question asked: Do geomagnetic excursions have any coherent geometry at all, or are they simply chaotic magnetic wanderings?
What we found: They do have geometry. When the data are treated as rotations rather than isolated pole positions, each major excursion collapses onto a single Earth-fixed plane, and most of the motion occurs within that plane. This was not a subtle effect - over 90% of the rotation lies in one plane for each event.
What we did not yet know: Why this plane exists, whether it is shared across excursions, or what - if anything - it has to do with Earth’s rotation or interior dynamics.

[2] Earth-Fixed Rotation Planes in Geomagnetic Excursions: A Two-Mode Interpretation of Core–Mantle Decoupling
Question asked: Is the plane found in the first paper a coincidence, or do multiple excursions share the same Earth-fixed geometry?
What we found: Independent excursions, separated by tens of thousands of years and recorded in different sediments, all select nearly the same plane. The planes are not randomly oriiented, and they are not artifacts of site geometry or data density.
What we did not yet know: Whether this geometry reflects rigid control by the mantle, a purely magnetic effect, or something weaker and more subtle.

[3] Earth-Fixed Geometric Structure in Geomagnetic Excursions: A Weakly Coupled Phase Interpretation
Question asked: Why does the excursion plane not line up exactly with independently inferred inertial or true polar wander reference planes?
What we found: The offset is not a contradiction - it is a phase relationship. Once the plane’s symmetry is handled correctly, the data show a persistent phase lag, not misalignment. The system is biased, not locked.
What we did not yet know: Whether such a phase-biased configuration could actually arise from plausible dynamics, or whether it was just a clever way of describing the data.

[4] Earth-Fixed Rotation Planes in Geomagnetic Excursions as an Emergent Property of a Weakly Coupled Two-Mode System
Question asked: Can weak coupling plus noise really produce the kind of Earth-fixed geometry seen in the data?
What we found: Yes - but only in a narrow regime. A simple two-mode stochastic model shows that Earth-fixed planes emerge naturally when coupling is weak and noise is strong, and only when excursions are defined as instability events rather than arbitrary time windows.
What we did not yet know: Whether this geometry mattered beyond the magnetic field itself.

[5] Earth-Fixed Inertial Reorientation, Geomagnetic Excursion Geometry, and Cryosphere-Specific Climate Response
Question asked: If excursions reflect inertial reorientation, does that have any mechanical consequence at Earth’s surface?
What we found: Small inertial shifts along excursion-derived axes selectively load and unload known ice-sheet discharge regions. The signal aligns with Heinrich events - but not with general climate variability.
What we did not yet know: Why some excursions appear to matter for ice sheets while others do not.

[6] Ice-Integrated Inertial True Polar Wander Diagnostics Across Late Quaternary Geomagnetic Excursions
Question asked: Are all inertial responses equivalent, or are only certain pathways dynamically accessible?
What we found: Different excursions activate different inertial channels - outlet-focused, internal-stress, or hemispheric - but never all at once. This rules out coincidence and bulk forcing and shows that excursions act as diagnostic probes of system state.
What we did not find: Any evidence for a single universal forcing mechanism. The system is selective, not uniform.

What this sequence collectively shows
Taken together, these papers show that geomagnetic excursions are neither random magnetic accidents nor simple markers of large-scale true polar wander. They are structured, Earth-fixed events that occur when a weakly coupled Earth system briefly exposes its internal geometry.

Each paper narrowed the question, and each answer constrained (not inflated) the interpretation.

The individual investigations behind each question are detailed in the PDF documents. These are necessarily heavy material to ensure reproducibility, but not too heavy that your friendly LLM won't be able to give a understandable summary.

[1] https://t.co/ULr4MbsNow
[2] https://t.co/PKm8eBY7j3
[3] https://t.co/nwJd8nvUHZ
[4] https://t.co/JBYKXnAKfD
[5] https://t.co/WDhzJ6TF8a
[6] https://t.co/rcKBVAkHv2

All 6 Papers (6.6mb) : https://t.co/Y6CrbyECrm
Code & Data (41.2mb): https://t.co/m0R7iCe0y0 .

[SpaceWeatherNews @SunWeatherMan]

There is at least one letter from Einstein to Velikovsky missing from the online repository.

At the top of the letter it instructs Immanuel to exclude it.

Instead, he gave it to his favorite member of The Thunderbolts, Michael Steinbacher.

Michael’s favorite human was me.

As he was dying in 2015, Michael let me read it and look through what Velikovsky had given him.

Einstein was highly frustrated by a conclusion he could not disprove, but also could not understand.

The earth turns over. It happens in one day.

No evidence Einstein looked at the sun or earths magnetic field.

I suspect Einstein did this with others, and that some of the critical ideas spat back and forth between heads is now lost forever.

[Kekius Maximus @Kekius_Sage]

Primes look chaotic in a line, but reveal structure when space curves.

Same numbers.
Different geometry.
Hidden order.

[Brian Roemmele @BrianRoemmele]

Interesting RV.

[Mindset Machine  @mindsetmachine]

4 years of therapy in 1 minute

[MERICA MEMED @Mericamemed]

Not all treasure is silver and gold mate

[David Sunfellow @sunfellow]

Ben Davidson @SunWeatherMan Uses Topographical Map To Describe Potential Catastrophic Flooding In North America
https://t.co/XflfbAGd7R

See also:

Flood Stories & Potential Safe Zones
https://t.co/B0rBzULg59
https://t.co/qjMhjJt8KR
https://t.co/QcWBcsE9TQ
https://t.co/YeUAVtluC7

Fluid Simulations That Evaluate Locations Worldwide Against An ECDO Inundation
https://t.co/2YbtGDUMUn

The Coming Pole Shift
https://t.co/xlxqNBWUOu

Ancient Civilizations & Earth Disaster Cycles
https://t.co/Xmou7SWtwJ

[John Rich🇺🇸 @johnrich]

Show this video to your kids…Wow😳

[Community Notes & Violations @CNviolations]

What a guy, lmao.