@MichelleDewbs@darrenpjones Because they think it is virtuous to lie. Every time they lie they prove to themselves their own worth, and their sound judgment about the public good. Even when they are relatively nice people like Darren Jones.
I see the Leftist/Ukrainian bots got a new talking point.
They say “these labs weren’t even a secret”. Yeah, no shit, they were officially on the books via the DTRA.
But if these labs were not a secret, then why did the Biden admin and MSM claim that these labs didn’t exist? Why did they censor and ban anyone who talked about these labs, which were not secret?
That’s the whole point. The Biden admin, along with their lapdogs in the media, just blatantly lied about the existence of these labs, despite the fact that we had incontrovertible evidence that these labs existed. It was even codified into US law via the Nunn-Lugar Act. The Biden admin and the media just lied about reality, hoping this problem would go away.
That’s why this is such a big deal. Because we caught them in a massive lie, which clearly means they have something to hide.
Flashback to March 10, 2022, when then Senator Rubio admitted that the “fact-checkers” straight up said that the labs didn’t exist, and they should have acknowledged it.
Well then the question becomes, who told them to lie, and why? The answer is, because they are an arm of the Democrat party, and they are attempting to cover their tracks. They admitted their guilt in the process of the coverup.
Two Scottish schoolgirls were assaulted, then smeared as racists. Now their attackers have been convicted. The real story is what the media’s rush to condemn them reveals about elite contempt for the working class in Brita https://t.co/Wsfu4nW95n
The revelations six years later are pouring out so quickly that it is impossible to keep up much less mentally process all this:
* The Director of National Intelligence has documented 120 US-funded/owned biolabs in 30 countries many of which are manufacturing and manipulating infectious diseases.
* Senator Rand Paul's committee has released the receipts concerning US funding/backing of the manufactured SARS-CoV-2 virus/vaccine as part of this program.
* Senator Johnson has produced definitive evidence that US public health agencies knew of the grave dangers of the shot to everyone but said nothing.
* Many officials are privately admitting/proving that the whole point of lockdowns was to preserve population immunity for the shot and block other avenues toward wellness.
* Hardly any of this makes the national news and one wonders if the public mind has any awareness at all.
A POLICE OFFICER SECRETLY EMAILED A LANDLORD TO GET A DISABLED TENANT EVICTED. CAMDEN COUNCIL HID EMAILS FROM THE OMBUDSMAN.
THIS IS WHAT AN INSIDE JOB LOOKS LIKE.
Someone messaged me on X a few weeks ago. His name is Ray Hanson @tenant49273533. He has disabilities. He sent me a pile of official documents and asked me to look at them.
I did.
Ray was living in a garden shed in Camden, North London. Not a converted one. Not a nice one. An illegal one. With rats. No heating. No hot water. Wires hanging out of a window. A toilet not fixed to the wall. A shower that did not work. And Camden Council knew about it since 2006.
A formal Enforcement Notice was issued against the property that year. The notice said a building had been constructed in the back garden without planning permission and people were living in it. Illegal.
Written down. Filed. Then Camden did what Camden apparently does best. Nothing.
Fourteen years passed. Ray ended up living there. In July 2020 Camden's own Environmental Health Officer finally visited and condemned the place on the spot. No fixed heating. A broken skylight. Rat holes in the front garden. A shower that did not work. A toilet hanging off the wall. A sink falling away from the wall. Dangerous electrics with wires going out through an open window. A kitchen so bad it was declared unsafe.
Camden's own document describes Ray as an extremely vulnerable tenant facing a very real risk of serious harm over winter. They banned the property from being used as a home.
That was July 2020. Now remember that date.
Because housing benefit records show £22,880 being paid directly to Ray's landlord in October 2021. Fifteen months after Camden condemned the property. With a weekly payment of £260 still running. Public money. Your taxes. Flowing to a landlord for accommodation that Camden's own officers had declared unfit and illegal. Nobody stopped it. Nobody joined the dots. Or maybe they just did not want to.
Then it gets worse.
In January 2021 a Metropolitan Police officer sent an email directly to Ray's landlord. Not to Ray. To the landlord. The email is on official Metropolitan Police headed paper with a verified collar number, station address, and direct phone numbers. He asked the landlord what his plans were for moving Ray out.
He said that once Ray was gone all the problems would be solved. He told the landlord he had a vested interest in making that happen.
He then referenced police powers to issue Community Protection Notices in the same email. A serving police officer emailing a private landlord asking when he planned to evict a disabled tenant living in a property that had already been condemned.
When Ray complained about this email a Met officer accused him of fabricating it and threatened him with a criminal review. The email is on official police headed paper with a verified collar number. So who fabricated what exactly.
While all this was happening Ray complained to the Local Government and Social Care Ombudsman, official case reference 20 003 347. During that investigation an internal Camden Council email surfaced.
A senior manager wrote to colleagues including the officer who signed the Prohibition Order and asked whether there were any past emails they would not want uploaded to the Ombudsman because of the sensitivity of relationship building.
A council manager asking his team which emails to hide from the official investigation. In writing. On a council email system.
Ray took his case to court. The judge confirmed everything. The property was an illegal construction, unfit for human habitation, with rats, no heating, no hot water and dangerous electrics. Ray Hanson was awarded £58,567.80 in damages. He won.
Then Camden Council went back to court and got him labelled a serial litigant. Because Ray had brought multiple claims about what happened to him, Camden's lawyers argued he was abusing the system. In November 2024 a General Civil Restraint Order was placed on him meaning he needed a judge's permission before making any further legal applications.
So when the possession hearing came in May 2025 Ray could not defend himself. His application was dismissed before it was even heard. The court granted possession to the landlord and said Ray owed £27,320 in rent arrears.
Just pause on those two numbers. Ray won £58,567.80 in damages from his landlord. Then a court said he owed that same landlord £27,320. Same man. Same landlord. Same condemned illegal shed.
On 11 August 2025 police arrived at the property with taser guns and removed Ray Hanson by force.
He was arrested and charged on the same day. He has been street homeless ever since. He is still homeless now. Still dealing with this. Still not resolved.
A disabled man. Housed in an illegal shed that Camden flagged in 2006. Condemned by their own officer in 2020. Public money paid to the landlord for over a year after that. A police officer working with the landlord behind his back. Council staff asking which emails to hide from investigators. A court victory worth nearly sixty thousand pounds that changed nothing. A legal order used to silence him. Armed police. Arrest. The street.
Camden called him the problem.
And if you think this is an isolated case, last week @SkyNews reported that Camden Council is now facing legal action from families whose children were abused at a West Hampstead nursery for seven years while Camden looked the other way. Different victims. Same council. Same pattern. Issue a notice. Start a review. Avoid accountability. Move on.
Ray Hanson is real. He is sleeping rough while Camden Council sits in its Town Hall on Judd Street. The documents are real. The court judgment is real. The Prohibition Order is real. The police email is real. The housing benefit payments are real.
@Victoria_Rixon@MLorrM@johnmcdonnellMP@premnsikka@stevemiddi1@nw_nicholas
Tearing my hair out watching news today 🫠
Any journalist covering the “social media ban” but not HOW it works is miserably failing + missing the story.
It won’t be remembered as a policy that kept kids off SM (it won’t) - but as the policy that introduced IDs for the internet.
Prof Wafik El-Deiry (@weldeiry) - “Finding the DNA was not very hard.. a bunch of high school students did it”.
Kevin McKernan made an “accidental discovery” when sequencing covid messenger RNA vaccine vials.
And in an “internet dare” Professor Phillip Buckhaults went to verify.
Then Labs and scientists around the World looked, including @DJSpeicher and @JesslovesMJK.
Even high school students working within an FDA lab did EXACTLY the same experiment.
They. All. Found. It.
Prof. El-Deiry echos the concerns of @Kevin_McKernan about agencies using old regulations to asses new messenger RNA technology, which bypass normal immune processes considered for traditional vaccines.
LNP’s bio distribute throughout the body.
And its contents are taken directly into the cell.
Islamic Religious Instruction, Combat Training And Hezbollah Sympathies. Welcome To The Peak District's Spiritual Warrior Camp.
Sayed Hussain Makke ran his Spiritual Warrior camp again this month. Same location, Darwin Lake in the Peak District. A camp built around Islamic religious instruction, evidently aimed at young Muslim men, combining wrestling and combat training with theology sold under the language of God-centric masculinity and brotherhood. A year ago a 16-year-old who attended said it felt like Hassan Nasrallah, Hezbollah's late leader, was with us again.
Makke has mourned Hezbollah fighters, including a British friend who died serving the proscribed group, and has also glorified senior figures in Iran's Revolutionary Guard. He attended Nasrallah's funeral and praised the size of the crowd as proof the resistance was alive and well. Hezbollah's military wing has been proscribed in Britain since 2008, its political wing since 2019. Supporting a proscribed organisation carries up to 14 years in prison.
Alicia Kearns, former chair of the foreign affairs select committee, has been reporting Makke to counter-terror police for months. This week he flew back into the country. Nothing happened. Her message to the Home Office was blunt. Months ago she handed the Government evidence about Hussain Makke. This week he walked into Britain unchallenged. If that is what stopping at nothing looks like, the Government's promises to Britain's Jewish community aren't worth the paper they're written on.
Counter Terrorism Policing London's response was a sentence built entirely out of conditional clauses. Reports get reviewed. Reviews get passed on. Nothing closes the loop.
When journalists reported on the camp, Makke's response, issued through a legal group, did not deny attending Nasrallah's funeral. It accused the Jewish Chronicle of being an asset of a hostile foreign regime and said British authorities should instead focus on tracking, capturing and imprisoning home-grown Jewish extremists who have served in the genocidal Israeli military. That statement was made by a man about to run a residential camp for teenagers, for the second year running, without having been arrested.
And there's a dimension to this that gets lost when every story involving an Islamic preacher gets filed under one heading. Makke is a Shia cleric trained at a seminary in Lebanon under Hezbollah influence, now based in an area of southern Lebanon with a significant Hezbollah presence. He is not representative of British Muslims generally, the large majority of whom are Sunni and have no connection to this. But what he is building, year on year, looks exactly like the organised, identity-based recruitment that has reshaped local politics in towns like Kirklees: discipline, cohesion, a shared sense of grievance and mission, instilled early and reinforced annually. Whatever you think of that model, it works. The institutions meant to be watching for it are, by their own account, still reviewing.
That asymmetry is the real story. A man with an open paper trail of pro-Hezbollah statements, openly hostile to British Jews in writing, runs annual camps for teenagers while an MP's repeated referrals sit in a queue. Henry Nowak's case showed what happens when officers are trained to treat a racism accusation as the primary fact requiring response. This is the same reflex from a different angle. A fear of how acting might look appears to carry more weight than a documented paper trail of supporting a proscribed terrorist organisation. Kearns has handed over the evidence. The question, asked directly, is whether anyone will open the file.
"Makke has mourned Hezbollah fighters, including a British friend who died serving the proscribed group, and has also glorified senior figures in Iran's Revolutionary Guard."
This isn't "5D chess" or any other weak excuse. The CDC, under the Trump administration, putting millions of American infants and adults at an elevated risk of death, disability, and injury will not "Make America Healthy Again."
$735,720,598.00 just awarded to Pfizer by the CDC for infant COVID shots. Another $505,272,000.00 awarded for adult vaccines.
As it is, seven million American children have been given a COVID shot since Trump took office.
If a terrorist organisation, Iran, or anyone other than Pfizer was endangering Americans like this, he would have threatened them with nuclear annihilation by now.
But don't worry, there's some fuzzy pictures of UFOs and aliens to keep you distracted.
The most remarkable aspect of the disclosed communication is not that it exists.
It is the language.
Read it carefully.
Not, "We assessed the reports."
Not, "We investigated the allegations."
Not, "We reviewed the evidence."
Instead, the communication refers to guidance "to not record" and describes that guidance as having been a "success".
A criminal justice system exists to receive information, assess evidence and determine facts.
It does not exist to achieve predetermined recording (or in this example, non-recording) outcomes.
The question therefore is very simple:
• Who issued the guidance?
• Under what authority was it issued?
• What oversight existed?
• And by what standard was its "success" measured?
These are not at all political questions. They are constitutional questions.
In any free society, the public are entitled to know not only what was done, but why it was done and from where the instruction originated.
Most importantly of all - What else remains hidden within the yet undisclosed archive of Operation Talla, or indeed of any UK policing operation?
A covert Home Office unit founded by an ex-MI6 spy has been secretly advising police on 'controlling the narrative' during Britain’s race riots, i.e., manipulating and suppressing speech. Is this thought policing? https://t.co/IHpPTgkRX9
The Metropolitan Police have abandoned impartiality in favour of progressive and contested ideologies.
Former elected Chairman of the Metropolitan Police Federation, Rick Prior, was unlawfully sacked by the Police Federation of England and Wales after saying in a GB News interview that rank-and-file officers were concerned about vexatious racism complaints being made against them simply for doing their jobs.
Rick was later brought into the Met Police’s policy unit and tasked with drafting new Diversity, Equality and Inclusion guidelines — only to have his recommendations ignored.
Watch Rick speak with FSU Director of Policy and Research @DavidRoseUK on the FSU Podcast 👇
TERMINATE Fauci's pardon & put him in prison.
NEW STUDY CONFIRMS: Fauci used FAKE PCR tests that prove 86% of ‘COVID cases’ were NOT real.
He TERRORIZED the World into taking deadly ‘Vaccines.’
His ‘Pandemic’ was entirely MANUFACTURED.
Oh. My. God.
Look at what these Biolabs were MANUFACTURING…
Anthrax, Tularaemia, Tuberculosis, Swine Fever, New Castles Disease, MERS, SARS, Marburg and Ebola
THERE MUST BE ARRESTS
The most advanced AI is now "too dangerous" for the public to use.
Too dangerous for independent scientists. For small labs. For you.
But safe for government and its approved partners.
The same government that funded gain-of-function research and hid it.
🧵
The BBC Has Ruled. Brexit Damaged The Economy. No Further Debate Required.
The BBC's editorial complaints unit has decided that the negative economic impact of Brexit is now a settled fact. Not a contested judgement. Not one side of a live debate. A fact, in the same category as man-made climate change, requiring no balancing view.
The ruling followed a Radio 4 Today programme segment featuring Andrew Bailey, the Governor of the Bank of England, alongside Liam Byrne and Sir John Gieve, both long-standing advocates of closer EU alignment. All three agreed Brexit had damaged growth. The presenter, Katya Adler, did not challenge the premise or introduce a dissenting voice. A complaint followed.
The ECU's response is the revealing part. It acknowledged the segment failed to "acknowledge the alternative case" for pursuing opportunities outside the EU rather than realignment with it. That part of the complaint was upheld. But the central complaint, that three pro-EU voices agreeing with each other on air is not balance, was dismissed. The reasoning given was that this reflected "the consensus among economists" and there was no "significant body of economic opinion" on the other side.
This is worth pausing on. The BBC is not claiming it found balance. It is claiming balance was unnecessary because one side of the argument does not meaningfully exist. The institution that is legally required to be impartial has ruled itself the arbiter of which questions are still open and which are closed, and Brexit has just been moved into the closed file.
The economics itself does not support the certainty on display. The headline figure driving much of this narrative, an 8 per cent hit to GDP since 2016, comes from an NBER paper built on a "synthetic control" model that constructs a hypothetical non-Brexit Britain from a basket of comparator countries. The largest weighting in that basket, over 60 per cent, is the United States, a country currently riding an AI investment boom and a separate fiscal stimulus. The model also weights Estonia and Greece more heavily than France or Germany. On a straightforward per capita basis against France and Germany, the actual comparators, Britain's performance since 2016 sits roughly in line with both. An 8 per cent gap simply isn't visible. This is a model producing a number that then gets reported as "the consensus," which the BBC then cites as the reason no alternative view is required.
That loop, model produces number, number becomes consensus, consensus becomes fact, fact requires no balance, is the mechanism. It does not require a conspiracy. It requires an institution that has decided which conclusions are respectable and which are not, and which then treats its own prior decision as evidence.
The same posture has been on display all week. A government department can decide its diversity targets are lawful without seeking legal advice to check. A police force can decide a book about dismantling "inner white supremacy" is leadership training. A broadcaster can decide an economic question is closed and that deciding so does not breach its own impartiality rules. In each case, the institution marks its own homework, and the mark is always a pass.
None of this requires Brexit to have been a triumph. Britain's economy has genuine problems, most of them unrelated to single market membership. But a state broadcaster, funded by compulsory licence fee under threat of prosecution, has now formally placed one of the most consequential political decisions in modern British history beyond the reach of its own impartiality obligations. Reform's Lee Anderson called it being "blinkered by groupthink." The more precise description is an institution that has stopped being able to tell the difference between its own assumptions and the facts.
"The BBC is not claiming it found balance. It is claiming balance was unnecessary because one side of the argument does not meaningfully exist."